The following article offers an overview of studies on the ethics of Mark in the last four decades. A longstanding tradition in biblical studies has been to render the second Evangelist void or nearly void of all ethical interest. Such disparaging conclusions in regard to the apparently ethically vacuous Gospel are representative in the comment by James Leslie Houlden: ‘For [Mark], as for John, it appears that facing and settling moral problems, in the everyday sense, was not a primary concern’ (Houlden, J.L. 1973 Ethics and the New Testament [Harmondsworth: Penguin]: 45). Scholarship on the Gospel of Mark has since turned a corner: a foray of studies has overturned the conclusion by James Houlden and countless others. The following article offers a summary of ethically sensitive studies of the Gospel of Mark with suggestions for further inquiry.
AernieJ.W.2016‘Cruciform Discipleship: The Narrative Function of the Women in Mark 15-16’, JBL135: 779-97.
2.
AllisonD.C.1998Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
3.
BeckR.R.1995Nonviolent Story: Narrative Conflict Resolution in the Gospel of Mark (Maryknoll: Orbis Books).
4.
BeloF.1981A Materialist Reading of the Gospel of Mark (trans. Matthew J. O’Connell; Maryknoll: Orbis Books).
5.
BlackC.C.2007‘Does Suffering Possess Educational Value in Mark’s Gospel?’, in BrawleyR.L. (ed.), Character Ethics and the New Testament: Moral Dimensions of Scripture (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press).
6.
BlackC.C.2012The Disciples According to Mark: Markan Redaction in Current Debate (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2nd edn).
7.
BondH.K.2020The First Biography of Jesus: Genre and Meaning in Mark’s Gospel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
8.
BrawleyR.L.2007‘Generating Ethics from God’s Character in Mark’, in BrawleyR.L. (ed.), Character Ethics and the New Testament (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press) 57-74.
9.
BrawleyR.L.2013‘Mark’, in GreenJ.B. (ed.), The New Testament and Ethics: A Book-by-Book Survey (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic) 44–46.
10.
BreytenbachC.2006‘Identity and Rules of Conduct in Mark: Following the Suffering, Expecting the Coming Son of Man’, in Van der WattJ.G.MalanF.S. (eds.), Identity, Ethics, and Ethos in the New Testament (BZNW, 141; New York: Walter de Gruyter) 49-75.
11.
BlountB.K.2001Then the Whisper Put on Flesh: New Testament Ethics in an African American Context (Nashville: Abingdon Press).
12.
BultmannR.1958Jesus and the Word(trans. Louise P. Smith and Erminie H. Lantero; New York: Scribner’s Sons).
13.
BurridgeR.2004What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biographies (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2nd edn).
14.
BurridgeR.2007Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
15.
BurridgeR.2010‘Ethics and Genre: The Narrative Setting of Moral Language in the New Testament’, in ZimmermanRvan der WattJ.G (eds.), Moral Language in the New Testament, Vol. II: The Interrelatedness of Language and Ethics in Early Christian Writings (WUNT, II/296; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 383-96.
16.
CadburyH.J.1937The Perils of Modernizing Jesus (New York, Macmillan).
17.
CarterW.2015‘Cross-Gendered Romans and Mark’s Jesus: Legion Enters the Pigs (Mark 5:1-20)’, JBL134: 139-55.
18.
ChoiJ.Y.2015Postcolonial Discipleship of Embodiment: An Asian and Asian American Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Mark (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
19.
CollinsR.F.1986Christian Morality: Biblical Foundations (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame).
20.
CollinsA.Y.1995‘Genre and the Gospels’, JR75: 239-46.
21.
ConnollyM.A.2018Disorderly Women and the Order of God: An Australian Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Mark (New York: Bloomsbury/T & T Clark).
22.
DonahueJ.1983The Theology and Setting of Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).
23.
DonahueJ.1988The Gospel in Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology in the Synoptic Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
24.
DewarL.1949An Outline of New Testament Ethics (Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
25.
EckE.v.2014‘Mission, Identity, and Ethics in Mark: Jesus, the Patron for Outsiders’, in KokJNicklasTRothD.T.HaysC.M. (eds.), Sensitivity Towards Outsiders: Exploring the Dynamic Relationship between Mission and Ethics in the New Testament and Early Christianity (WUNT, II/364; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 101-32.
26.
EdwardsR.A.1970 ‘A New Approach to the Gospel of Mark’, Lutheran Quarterly22: 333-34.
27.
FlewR.N.1963Jesus and His Way: A Study of the Ethics of the New Testament (London: Epworth Press).
28.
FreyneS.2010‘In Search of Identity: Narrativity, Discipleship, and Moral Agency’, in ZimmermanRvan der WattJ.G (eds.), Moral Language in the New Testament: The Interrelatedness of Language and Ethics in Early Christian Writings, Volume Two (WUNT, II/296; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 67-85.
29.
FurnishV.P.1972The Love Command in the New Testament (Nashville: Abington Press).
30.
GagerJ.1975Kingdom and Community: The Social World of Early Christianity (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
31.
GosnellP.W.2014The Ethical Vision of the Bible: Learning Good from Knowing God (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press Academic).
32.
GusheeD.P.StassenG.H.2016Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016, 2nd edn).
33.
GustafsonJ.M.1968Christ and the Moral Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Hamerton-KellyR.G.1994The Gospel and the Sacred: Poetics of Violence in Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
36.
HarringtonD.J.KeenanJ.F.. 2002Jesus and Virtue Ethics: Building Bridges Between New Testament Studies and Moral Theology (Lanham, MD: Sheed & Ward).
37.
HaysR.B.1996The Moral Vision of the New Testament: Community, Cross, New Creation: A Contemporary Introduction to New Testament Ethics (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco).
38.
HaysR.B.2006‘Mapping the Field: Approaches to New Testament Ethics’, in van der WattJ.G.MalanF.S. (eds.), Identity, Ethics, and Ethos in the New Testament (BZNW, 141; New York: Walter de Gruyter).
39.
HengelM.1981The Charismatic Leader and His Followers (trans. James Greig; New York: Crossroad).
40.
HoffmannP.EidV.. 1975Jesus von Nazareth und eine christliche Moral (QD, 66; Freiburg: Herder).
41.
HorrellD.G.2009‘Whither Social-Scientific Approaches to the New Testament? Reflections on Contested Methodologies and the Future’, in StillT.D.HorrellD.G. (eds.), After the First Urban Christians: The Social-Scientific Study of Pauline Christianity Twenty-Five Years Later (New York: Continuum) 6-20.
42.
HouldenJ.L.1973Ethics and the New Testament (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
43.
JacobyD.H.1899Neutestamentliche Ethik (Königsberg: Thomas & Oppermann).
44.
JohnsonL.T.2009‘The Jesus of the Gospels and Philosophy’, in MoserP.K. (ed.), Jesus and Philosophy: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 63-83.
45.
KeckL.2001Who is Jesus? History in the Perfect Tense (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
46.
KeeH.C.1977Community of the New Age: Studies in Mark’s Gospel (Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
47.
KelberW.H.1979Mark’s Story of Jesus (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
48.
LaddG.E. 1974A Theology of the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
49.
LeanderH.2013Discourses of Empire: The Gospel of Mark from a Postcolonial Perspective (SS, 71; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
50.
LohseE.1991Theological Ethics of the New Testament (trans. Eugene Boring; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
51.
MackB.1988Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
52.
MalinaB.2001The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 3rd rev. edn).
53.
MarshallL.H.1946The Challenge of New Testament Ethics (London: Macmillan and Co.).
54.
MateraF.1996The Legacies of Jesus and Paul: New Testament Ethics (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press).
55.
MathesonG.1888Landmarks of New Testament Morality (London: James Nisbet & Co.).
56.
MathewsS.1897The Social Teaching of Jesus: An Essay in Christian Sociology (New York: MacMillan).
57.
McDonaldJ.I.H.1998The Crucible of Christian Morality (New York: Routledge).
58.
MeeksW.1983The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul (New Haven: Yale University Press).
59.
MeeksW.1986The Moral World of the First Christians (Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
60.
MeeksW.1993Origins of Christian Morality: The First Two Centuries (New Haven: Yale University Press).
61.
MeeksW.1996 ‘The Ethics of the Fourth Evangelist’, in Alan CulpepperR.Clifton BlackC. (eds.), Exploring the Gospel of John: In Honor of D. Moody Smith (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press).
62.
MercedesA.2011Power For: Feminism and Christ’s Self-Giving (New York: T & T Clark).
63.
MillerS.2004Women in Mark’s Gospel (JSNTSup, 259; New York: T&T Clark).
64.
MitchellJ.L.2001Beyond Fear and Silence: A Feminist-Literary Approach to the Gospel of Mark (New York: Continuum).
65.
MooreS.D.2006Empire and Apocalypse: Postcolonialism and the New Testament (BMW, 12; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
66.
MyersC.2008Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus (Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 20th anniv. edn [orig. 1988]).
67.
MylesR.J. 2016‘The Fetish for a Subversive Jesus’, JSHJ14: 52-70.
68.
NeufeldD.2014Mockery and Secretism in the Social World of Mark's Gospel (LNTS, 503; New York: Bloomsbury/T & T Clark).
69.
NevilleD.J.2008‘Moral Vision and Eschatology in Mark’s Gospel: Coherence or Conflict?’, JBL127: 359-384.
70.
NevilleD.J2013A Peaceable Hope: Contesting Violent Eschatology in New Testament Narratives (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
71.
PeroC.2013Liberation from Empire: Demonic Possession and Exorcism in the Gospel of Mark (SBL, 150; New York: Peter Lang, 2013).
72.
PerrinN.1968‘The Creative Use of the Son of Man Traditions by Mark’, Union Seminary Quarterly Review23: 357-65.
73.
PerrinN.1971‘Towards an Interpretation of the Gospel of Mark’, in Dieter BetzH. (ed.), Christology and a Modern Pilgrimage: A Discussion with Norman Perrin (Claremont: New Testament Colloquium)1-78.
74.
RhoadsD.MichieD.. 1982Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
75.
RhoadsD.DeweyJ.MichieD.. 2012Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 3rd edn).
76.
RobbinsV.K.1992Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
77.
RohrbaughR.L.2008‘The Social Location of the Markan Audience’, in NeyreyJ.H.StewartE.C. (eds.), The Social World of the New Testament: Insights and Models (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers) 143-62.
78.
SamuelS.2007A Postcolonial Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus (London: T & T Clark, 2007).
79.
SandersJ.T.1975Ethics in the New Testament: Change and Development (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
80.
SchmidC. F.1877Biblical Theology of the New Testament (trans. G. H. Venables; CFTL, 27; Edinburgh: T & T Clark).
81.
SchnackenburgR.1964The Moral Teaching of the New Testament (London: Burns & Oats).
82.
SchrageW.1982Ethik des Neuen Testaments (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht) (trans. 1988 as The Ethics of the New Testament [trans. David E. Green; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
SchweitzerA.1985The Mystery of the Kingdom of God: The Secret of Jesus’ Messiahship and Passion (trans. Walter Lowrie; Buffalo: Prometheus Books, [orig. 1914]).
85.
SchweitzerA.2001The Quest of the Historical Jesus (ed. BowdenJ.; trans. W. Montgomery; Minneapolis: Fortress Press[orig. German 1906]).
86.
SchwiebertJ.2017‘Jesus’s Question to Pilate in Mark 15:2’, JBL136: 937-47.
87.
ShinerW.T.1995Follow Me! Disciples in Markan Rhetoric (SBLDS, 145; Atlanta: Scholars Press).
88.
SkinnerC.W.2011‘Telling the Story: The Appearance and Impact of Mark as Story’, in IversonK.R.SkinnerC.W. (eds.), Mark as Story: Retrospect and Prospect (SBLRBS, 65; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).
89.
SpicqC.1965Théologie Morale du Nouveau Testament, vol. 1 (Paris: Librairie Lecoffre).
90.
St ClairR.A.2008Call and Consequences: A Womanist Reading of Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
91.
StowersS.K.2010‘Jesus the Teacher and Stoic Ethics in the Gospel of Matthew’, in RasimusT.Engberg-PedersenT.DunderbergI. (eds.), Stoicism in Early Christianity (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic) 59-75.
92.
StreckerG.2000Theology of the New Testament (trans. M. Eugene Boring; Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press).
93.
SwartleyW.2006Covenant of Peace: The Missing Peace in New Testament Theology and Ethics (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
94.
TannehillR.C.1977‘The Disciples in Mark: The Function of a Narrative Role’, JR57: 386-405.
95.
LiewTB.1999Politics of Parousia: Reading Mark Inter(con) textuality. Boston: Brill.
96.
TheissenG.1992Social Reality and the Early Christians: Theology, Ethics, and the World of the New Testament (trans. Margaret Kohl; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
97.
ThorsteinssonR.M.2010Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism: A Comparative Study of Ancient Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
98.
ThorsteinssonR.M.2018Jesus as Philosopher: The Moral Sage in the Synoptic Gospels (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
99.
VerheyA.1984The Great Reversal: Ethics and the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
100.
VerheyA.2002Remembering Jesus: Christian Community, Scripture, and the Moral Life (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
101.
ViaD.O.1985The Ethics of Mark’s Gospel: In the Middle of Time (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
102.
VinsonR.B.LipsettB.D.. 2014‘Mark’, in BrawleyR.L. (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Ethics, Volume Two (New York: Oxford University Press) 4-10.
103.
WatsonD.F.2010a Honor Among Christians: The Cultural Key to the Messianic Secret (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
104.
WatsonD.F.2010b ‘The Life of Aesop and the Gospel of Mark: Two Ancient Approaches to Elite Values’, JBL129: 699-716.
105.
WatsonF.1985‘The Social Function of Mark’s Secrecy Motif’, JSNT24: 49-69.
106.
WinnA.2014‘The Markan Secrecy Motif and Roman Political Ideology’, JBL133: 583-601.
