Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theological. After this, a briefer second section outlines the four arguments defending the authenticity of the verses: textual, contextual, traditional, and rhetorical.

Keywords

1 Thessalonians 2.13-16 anti-semitic authenticity historical interpolation polemic post-Pauline structural

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ascough

R.S.

2014 1 and 2 Thessalonians: Encountering the Christ Group at Thessalonike (PGNT, 13; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press).

Bammel

1959 ‘Judenverfolgung und Naherwartung: Zur Eschatologie des ersten Thessalonicherbriefs’, ZTK 56: 294-315.

Baur

F.C.

2003 Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ: His Life and Works, His Epistles and Teachings—Two Volumes in One (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).

Best

1972 A Commentary on the First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians (HNTC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).

Bockmuehl

2001 ‘1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and the Church in Jerusalem’, TynBul 52.1: 1-31.

Boers

1976 ‘The Form Critical Study of Paul’s Letters: 1 Thessalonians as a Case Study’, NTS 22: 140-58.

Boring

M.E.

2015 I & II Thessalonians: A Commentary (NTL; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press).

Bruce

F.F.

1982 1 & 2 Thessalonians (WBC, 45; Waco, TX: Word).

Collins

R.F.

1984 ‘Apropos the Integrity of 1 Thess’, in Collins

Raymond F.

(eds.), Studies on the First Letter to the Thessalonians (BETL, 66; Leuven: Leuven University Press) 96-135.

10.

Donfried

K.P.

1984 ‘Paul and Judaism: 1 Thessalonians 2:13-16 as a Test Case’, Int 38: 242-53.

11.

Fee

G.D.

2009 The First and Second Letters to the Thessalonians (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).

12.

Funk

R.W.

1967 ‘The Apostolic Parousia: Form and Significance’, in Farmer

W.R.

Moule

C.F.D.

Niebuhr

R.R.

(eds.), Christian History and Interpretation: Studies Presented to John Knox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 249-68.

13.

Gillard

F.D.

1989 ‘The Problem of the Antisemitic Comma between 1 Thessalonians 2:14 and 15’, NTS 35.4: 481-502.

14.

Gillard

F.D.

1994 ‘Paul and the Killing of the Prophets in 1 Thess. 2:15’, NovT 36.3: 259-70.

15.

Green

G.L.

2002 The Letters to the Thessalonians (PNTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).

16.

Hagner

D.A.

1993 ‘Paul’s Quarrel with Judaism’, in Evans

C.A.

Hagner

D.A.

(eds.), Anti-Judaism and Early Christianity: Issues of Polemic and Faith (Minneapolis: Fortress) 128-50.

17.

Holmstrand

1997 Markers and Meaning in Paul: An Analysis of 1 Thessalonians, Philippians and Galatians (CBNT, 28; Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell).

18.

Holtz

1990 ‘The Judgement on the Jews and the Salvation of all Israel: 1 Thes 2,15-16 and Rom 11, 25-26’, in Collins

R.F.

(ed.), The Thessalonian Correspondence (Leuven: Peeters) 284-94.

19.

Hurd

J.C.

1986 ‘Paul Ahead of his Time: 1 Thess. 2:13-16’, in Richardson

(ed.), Anti-Judaism in Early Christianity: I. Paul and the Gospels (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press) 21-36.

20.

Jewett

1986 The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress).

21.

Johnson-DeBaufre

2012 ‘Historical Approaches: Which Past? Whose Past?’, in Marchal

J.A.

(ed.), Studying Paul’s Letters: Contemporary Perspectives and Methods (Minneapolis: Fortress) 13-32.

22.

Koester

1979 ‘1 Thessalonians—Experiment in Christian Writing’, in Church

F.F.

George

(eds.), Continuity and Discontinuity in Church History (Leiden: Brill) 33-44.

23.

Lamp

J.S.

2003 ‘Is Paul Anti-Jewish? Testament of Levi 6 in the Interpretation of 1 Thessalonians 2:13-16’, CBQ 65: 408-27.

24.

Luckensmeyer

2009 The Eschatology of First Thessalonians (NTOA, 71; Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht).

25.

Lyons

1985 Pauline Autobiography: Toward a New Understanding (SBLDS, 73; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).

26.

Malherbe

A.J.

2000 The Letters to the Thessalonians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 32B; New Haven, CT: Anchor Yale).

27.

Murrell

N.S.

1994 ‘The Human Paul of the New Testament: Anti-Judaism in 1 Thess 2:14-16’, Proceedings 14: 169-86.

28.

Okeke

G.E.

1980 ‘1 Thessalonians 2:13-16: The Fate of the Unbelieving Jews’, NTS 27.1: 127-36.

29.

Orchard

J.B.

1938 ‘Thessalonians and the Synoptic Gospels’, Bib 19: 19-42.

30.

Pearson

B.A.

1971 ‘1 Thessalonians 2:13-16: A Deutro-Pauline Interpolation’, HTR 64: 79-94, reprinted with slight revision in B.A. Pearson, The Emergence of the Christian Religion: Essays on Early Christianity (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity International Press, 1997) 58-74.

31.

Porter

S.E.

2013 ‘Translation, Exegesis, and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15: Could a Comma Have Changed the Course of History?’, The Bible Translator 64.1: 82-98.

32.

Richard

E.J.

1995 First and Second Thessalonians (Sacra Pagina, 11; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical).

33.

Rydelnik

M.A.

2008 ‘Was Paul Anti-Semitic? Revisiting 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16’, BSac 165: 58-67.

34.

Sanders

J.T.

1962 ‘The Transitions from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters of the Pauline Corpus’, JBL 81.4: 348-62.

35.

Schippers

1966 ‘The Pre-Synoptic Tradition in 1 Thessalonians 2:13-16’, NovT 8: 223-34.

36.

Schlueter

C.J.

1994 Filling up the Measure: Polemic Hyperbole in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (JSNTSup, 98; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).

37.

Schmidt

1983 ‘1 Thess. 2:13-16: Linguistic Evidence for an Interpolation’, JBL 102.2: 269-79.

38.

Setzer

C.J.

1994 Jewish Responses to Early Christians: History and Polemics, 30–150 C.E. (Minneapolis: Fortress).

39.

Simpson

J.W.

1990 ‘The Problems Posed by 1 Thessalonians 2:15-16 and a Solution’, Horizons in Biblical Theology 12.1: 42-72.

40.

Stegemann

1996 ‘Remarques sur la polémique antijudaïque dans 1 Thessaloniciens 2, 14-16’, in Marguerat

(ed.), Le déchirement: Juifs et chrétiens au premier siècle (Genève: Labor et Fides) 99-112.

41.

Still

T.D.

1999 Conflict at Thessalonica: A Pauline Church and its Neighbours (JSNTSup, 183; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).

42.

van Kooten

G.H

. 2010 ‘Broadening the New Perspective on Paul: Paul and the Ethnographical Debate of his Time—The Criticism of Jewish and Pagan Ancestral Customs (1 Thess 2:13-16)’, in Goodman

van Kooten

G.H.

van Ruiten

J.T.A.G.M.

(eds.), Abraham, the Nations, and the Hagarites: Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Perspectives on Kinship with Abraham (Leiden: Brill) 319-44.

43.

Walker

W.O.

1987 ‘The Burden of Proof in Identifying Interpolations in the Pauline Letters’, NTS 33: 610-18.

44.

Wanamaker

C.A.

1990 The Epistles to the Thessalonians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).

45.

Weatherly

J.A.

1991 ‘The Authenticity of 1 Thessalonians 2:13-16: Additional Evidence’, JSNT 42: 79-98.

46.

Weima

J.A.D.

2014 1–2 Thessalonians (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).

The (In)authenticity of 1 Thessalonians 2.13-16: A Review of Arguments

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References