The so-called ‘Christ hymn’ of Phil. 2.5-11 has maintained great scholarly interest for over a century, with monographs and articles continuing to appear that seek to address important critical issues. Questions including the pre-existence of Christ and ‘kenotic theology’ have digressed and been revived with the invocation of numerous methodologies and the influence of major philosophical trends external to New Testament studies proper. This article tracks the major trends in research of Phil. 2.5-11, with a view to three central topics of interest: the authorship and origin of the passage, its plausible hymnic structure and form, and its function and theology within the letter itself, including its ancient audience.
BeareF.W.1959The Epistle to the Philippians (BNTC; London: Adam & Charles Black).
2.
BlackD.A.1988 ‘The Authorship of Philippians 2:6-11: Some Literary-Critical Observations’, Criswell Theological Review2: 269-89.
3.
BockmuehlM.1998The Epistle to the Philippians (BNTC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
4.
BreckJ.1987 ‘Biblical Chiasmus: Exploring Structure for Meaning’, BTB17.2: 70-74.
5.
BriggsS.1989 ‘Can an Enslaved God Liberate? Hermeneutical Reflections on Philippians 2:6-11’, Semeia47: 137-53.
6.
CollinsA.Y.2003 ‘Psalms, Philippians 2:6-11, and the Origins of Christology’, BibInt11.4: 361-72.
7.
DunnJ.D.G.1996Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation (2nd edn; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
8.
EastmanS.2008 ‘Imitating Christ Imitating Us: Paul’s Educational Project in Philippians’, in WagnerJ.R.RoweC.K.GriebA.K. (eds.), The Word Leaps the Gap: Essays on Scripture and Theology in Honor of Richard B. Hays (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 427-52.
9.
EastmanS.2011 ‘Philippians 2:6-11: Incarnation as Mimetic Participation’, JSPL1.1: 1-23.
10.
EllisE.E.2000 ‘Preformed Traditions and their Implications for Pauline Christology’, in HorrellD.G.TuckettC.M. (eds.), Christology, Controversy and Community: New Testament Essays in Honor of David R. Catchpole (NovTSup, 99; Leiden: Brill): 303-20.
11.
FeeG.D.1992 ‘Philippians 2:5-11: Hymn or Exalted Pauline Prose’, BBR2: 29-46.
12.
FiskB.N.2006 ‘The Odyssey of Christ: A Novel Context for Philippians 2:6-11’, in EvansC.S. (ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 45-73.
13.
FitzmyerJ.A.1988 ‘The Aramaic Background of Philippians 2:6–11’, CBQ50: 470-83.
14.
FowlS.E.1990The Story of Christ in the Ethics of Paul: An Analysis of the Function of the Hymnic Material in the Pauline Corpus (JSNTSup, 36; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
15.
FowlS.E.2005Philippians (The Two Horizons New Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
16.
GibbsJ.G.1970 ‘The Relation between Creation and Redemption according to Phil. II:5-11’, NovT12.3: 270-83.
17.
GormanM.J.2007 ‘“Although/Because He Was in the Form of God”: The Theological Significance of Paul’s Master Story (Phil 2:6-11)’, JTI1.2: 147-69.
18.
GormanM.J.2009Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
19.
GundryR.H.1994 ‘Style and Substance in “The Myth of God Incarnate” according to Philippians 2:6-11’, in PorterS.E.GoulderM.D. (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries: Essays in Honour of Michael D. Goulder (BIS, 8; Leiden: Brill): 271-94.
20.
HarveyJ.1965 ‘A New Look at the Christ Hymn in Philippians 2:6-11’, ExpTim76.11: 337-39.
21.
HeenE.M.2004 ‘Phil 2:6-11 and Resistance to Local Timocratic Rule: Isa theō and the Cult of the Emperor in the East’, in HorsleyR.A. (ed.), Paul and the Roman Imperial Order (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International): 125-54.
22.
HellermanJ.H.2005Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum (SNTSMS, 132; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
23.
HellermanJ.H.2009 ‘ΜΟΡΦΗ ΘΕΟΥ as a Signifier of Social Status in Philippians 2:6’, JETS52.4: 779-97.
24.
HellermanJ.H.2010 ‘Vindicating God’s Servants in Philippi and Philippians: The Influence of Paul’s Ministry in Philippi on the Composition of Philippians 2:6’, BBR20.1: 85-102.
25.
HookerM.D.1975 ‘Philippians 2:6-11’, in EllisE.E.GräßerE. (eds.), Jesus und Paulus: Festschrift für Werner Georg Kümmel zum 70. Geburtstag (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht): 151-64.
26.
HurtadoL.W.1984 ‘Jesus as Lordly Example in Philippians 2:5–11’, in RichardsonP.HurdJ.C. (eds.), From Jesus to Paul: Studies in Honour of Francis Wright Beare (Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press): 113-26.
27.
JeremiasJ.1953 ‘Zur Gedankenfuehrung in den paulinischen Briefen’, in StevensterJ.W.van UnnickW.C. (eds.), Studia Paulina in honorem Johannes de Zwaan, septuagenarii (Haarlem: Bohn): 146-54.
28.
KäsemannE.1968 ‘A Critical Analysis of Philippians 2:5–11’, JTC5: 45-88.
29.
KümmelG.W.1950 ‘Mythos im Neuen Testament’, Theologische Zeitschrift6.5: 321-37.
30.
LightfootJ.B.1868St. Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians: A Revised Text with Introduction, Notes and Dissertations (12th edn1988; reprint 1995; Peabody: Hendrickson).
31.
LohmeyerE.1930Der Brief an die Philipper (MeyerKommentar; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
32.
LohmeyerE.1961Kyrios Jesus: Eine Untersuchung zu Phil 2, 5-11 (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissesch., Phil.hist Kl.; 2nd edn; Heidelberg: Winter).
33.
MacQuarrieJ.1966 ‘The Pre-existence of Christ’, ExpTim77.7: 199-202.
34.
MarshallI.H.1968 ‘The Christ-Hymn in Philippians 2:5–11’, TynBul19: 104-27.
35.
MartinR.P.1983Carmen Christi: Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship (SNTSMS, 4; reprt.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans [1967]).
36.
MartinR.P.DoddB.J. (eds.) 1998Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2 (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
37.
MoessnerD.P.2009 ‘Turning Status “Upside Down” in Philippi: Christ Jesus’ “Emptying Himself” as Forfeiting any Acknowledgment of his “Equality with God” (Phil 2:6-11)’, Horizons in Biblical Theology31: 123-43.
38.
Murphy-O’ConnerJ.1976 ‘Christological Anthropology in Phil 2:6–11’, RB83.1: 25-50.
39.
NebradaS.R.2011Christ Identity: A Social-Scientific Reading of Philippians 2.5-11 (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, 240; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
40.
OakesP.2001Philippians: From People to Letter (SNTSMS, 110; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
41.
O’BrienP.T.1991The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
42.
RobbinsC.J.1980 ‘Rhetorical Structure of Philippians 2:6-11’, CBQ42.1: 73-82.
43.
RogersP.R.2007 ‘A Textual Commentary in Philippians 2.5-11’, in EllensJ.H. (ed.), Text and Community: Essays in Memory of Bruce M. Metzger Volume 1 (NTM, 19; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix): 187-95.
44.
TalbertC.H.1967 ‘The Problem of Pre-existence on Philippians 2:6–11’, JBL86.2: 141-53.
45.
TobinT.H.2006 ‘The World of Thought in the Philippians Hymn (Philippians 2:6-11)’, in FotopoulosJ. (ed.), The New Testament and Early Christian Literature in Greco-Roman Context: Studies in Honor of David E. Aune (NovTSup, 122; Leiden: Brill): 91-104.
46.
WanamakerC.A.1987 ‘Philippians 2.6-11: Son of God or Adamic Christology?’ NTS33.2: 179-93.
47.
WorthamR.A.1996 ‘Christology as Community Identity in the Philippians Hymn: The Philippians Hymn as Social Drama (Philippians 2:5–11)’, Perspectives in Religious Studies23.3: 269-87.
48.
WuestK.S.1958 ‘When Jesus Emptied Himself’, BibSac115.458: 153-58.
