For many decades now Markan scholarship has struggled to uncover the structure of Mark’s gospel. With the advent of literary/narrative criticism the struggle has intensified to understand how the gospel unfolds in order to tell its story of Jesus. This article surveys recent and current proposals that have been advanced for Mark’s gospel. Some scholars have judged that there is no structure; others have found a highly complex web of interrelated sections. While many proposals use a mixture of principles to derive the alleged structure, an attempt has been made to classify the proposals based upon the primary principle used. These categories include: topography/geography; theological themes; Sitz im Leben of the recipients; literary factors.
Anderson, H.1981The Gospel of Mark (NCB; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
3.
Aune, D. E.1987The New Testament in Its Literary Environment (The Library of Early Christianity, 8; Philadelphia: Westminster Press ).
4.
Best, E.1983Mark: The Gospel as Story (Studies in the New Testament and Its World; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark ).
5.
Boomershine, T. E.1987‘Peter’s Denial as Polemic or Confession: The Implications of Media Criticism for Biblical Hermeneutics’ , Semeia39: 47-68 .
6.
Bowman, J.1965The Gospel of Mark: The New Christian Jewish Passover Haggadah (SPB, 8; Leiden: E.J. Brill ).
7.
Brett, L. F.X.1986‘Suggestions for an Analysis of Mark’s Arrangement’, in C.S. Mann, Mark: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 27; New York: Doubleday ): 174-190.
8.
Bryan, C.1993Preface to Mark: Notes on the Gospel in Its Literary and Cultural Setting ( New York: Oxford University Press ).
9.
Carrington, P.1952The Primitive Christian Calendar: A Study in the Making of the Markan Gospel ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
10.
Cook, J. G.1995The Structure and Persuasive Power of Mark: A Linguistic Approach (SBLSS; Atlanta: Scholars Press ).
11.
1962Christian Origins and Judaism ( Philadelphia: Westminster Press ).
12.
Derrett, J. D.M.1985The Making of Mark: The Scriptural Bases of the Earliest Gospel (2 vols.; Shipston-on-Stour: Drinkwater ).
13.
1991‘Mark as Interwoven Tapestry: Forecasts and Echoes for a Listening Audience’ , CBQ53: 221-236 .
14.
Dewey, J. (ed.) 1994‘Orality and Textuality in Early Christian Literature’ , Semeia65 .
15.
repr. in NTS (1953): 1-11 .
16.
Donahue, J. R.1973Are You the Christ? The Trial Narrative in the Gospel of Mark (SBLDS, 10; Missoula, MT: SBL ).
17.
Donahue, J. R. , and D. J. Harrington2002The Gospel of Mark (Sacra Pagina, 2; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press ).
18.
2002The Gospel according to Mark (PNTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
19.
Egger, W. 1976 Frohbotschaft und Lehre: Die Sammelberichte des Wirkens Jesu im Markusevangelium (Frankfurt: Knecht).
20.
Ellis, P. F.1975‘Patterns and Structures of Mark’s Gospel’, in M. Ward (ed.), Biblical Studies in Contemporary Thought ( Somerville, MA: Greeno, Hadden & Co. ): 88-103.
21.
Evans, C. A.2001Mark 8.27-16.20 (WBC, 34B; Nashville: Thomas Nelson ).
22.
Farrer, A. M.1951A Study in Mark ( Westminster: Dacre ).
23.
2001Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark ( Harrisburg: Trinity Press International [1991]).
24.
France, R. T.2002The Gospel of Mark (NIGTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
25.
Gardner, A. E.1999‘Patterns that Connect: The Transfiguration, the Providence of God, and the Chiasms’ , Enc60: 355-391 .
26.
Gnilka, J.1998Das Evangelium nach Markus (EKKNT, 2.1; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchner Verlag , 5th edn [1st edn, 1978]).
27.
Guelich, R. A.1989Mark 1-8.26 (WBC, 34a; Dallas: Word Books ).
28.
Gundry, R.1993Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross ( Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
29.
Hall, D. 1998 The Gospel Framework: Fiction or Fact? A Critical Evaluation of Der Rahmen der Geschichte Jesu by Karl Ludwig Schmidt (Carlisle: Paternoster Press).
30.
1997‘Greco-Roman Textuality and the Gospel of Mark: A Critical Assessment of Werner Kelber’s The Oral and the Written Gospel’ , BBR7: 91-106 .
31.
1984‘The Role of “Summary Statements” in the Composition of the Gospel of Mark: A Dialog with Karl Schmidt and Norman Perrin’ , NovT26: 289-311 .
32.
Heil, J. P.1992The Gospel of Mark as a Model for Action: A Reader-Response Commentary ( New York: Paulist Press ).
33.
Hobbs, E.C. 1958 ‘The Gospel of Mark and the Exodus’ (PhD dissertation, University of Chicago).
34.
Hooker, M. D.1991The Gospel According to St. Mark (BNTC, 2; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson ).
35.
Humphrey, H.1992He is Risen? A New Reading of Mark’s Gospel ( New York: Paulist Press ).
36.
Hurtado, L. W.1990‘The Gospel of Mark: Evolutionary or Revolutionary Document?’JSNT40: 15-32 .
Johnson, S.1972The Gospel According to St. Mark (HNTC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson , 2nd edn [1960]).
39.
Juel, D.1994A Master of Surprise: Mark Interpreted ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press ).
40.
Kee, H. C.1983Community of the New Age: Studies in Mark’s Gospel (repr.; ROSE, 6; Macon, GA: Mercer University Press [1977]).
41.
1997The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul and Q (Voices in Performance and Text; repr.; Bloomington: Indiana University Press [1983]).
Lane, W.1974The Gospel According to Mark (NICNT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
44.
Lang, F. G.1977‘Kompositionsanalyse des Markusevangeliums’ , ZTK74: 1-24 .
45.
2002bReview of Isaiah’s New Exodus in Mark , by R. Watts, in Stone-Campbell Journal5: 144-146 .
46.
Lewis, P. B.1978‘Indications of a Liturgical Source in the Gospel of Mark’ , Enc39: 385-394 .
47.
Lightfoot, R. H.1938Locality and Doctrine in the Gospels ( New York: Harper ).
48.
1967Das Evangelium des Markus (KEK, 2; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht , 17th edn).
49.
Lührmann, D. 1987 Das Markusevangelium (HNT, 3; Tübingen: Mohr).
50.
1991Narrative Space and Mythic Meaning in Mark (The Biblical Seminar, 13; Sheffield: JSOT Press ).
51.
Manicardi, E. 1981 Il cammino di Gesù nel Vangelo di Marco: Schema narrativo e tema cristologico (AnBib, 96; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute).
52.
Marcus, J.2002Mark 1-8 (AB, 27; New York: Doubleday ).
53.
Martin, R.1973Mark: Evangelist and Theologian (Contemporary Evangelical Perspectives; Grand Rapids: Zondervan ).
54.
Marxsen, W.1969Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel ( Nashville: Abingdon Press ).
55.
1983‘The Gospels and Jewish Lectionaries’, in R. T. France and D. Wenham (eds.), Gospel Perspectives, III ( Sheffield: JSOT Press ): 129-156.
56.
Myers, C.1990Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus ( Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books , 2nd edn[1988]).
57.
1963The Gospel of St. Mark (Penguin New Testament Commentary; New York: Penguin Books ).
58.
Parunak, H. V.D.1983‘Transitional Techniques in the Bible’ , JBL102: 525-548 .
59.
Peace, R. V.1999Conversion in the New Testament: Paul and the Twelve ( Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
60.
Perrin, N.1974‘Towards an Interpretation of the Gospel of Mark’, in H. B. Betz (ed.), Christology and a Modern Pilgrimage ( Missoula, MT: SBL and Scholars , rev. edn [1st edn, 1971]): 7-13.
61.
Perrin, N. , and D. C. Dulling1982The New Testament: An Introduction ( New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich , 2nd edn[1974]).
Quesnell, Q.1969The Mind of Mark: Interpretation and Method through the Exegesis of Mark 6,52 (AnBib, 38; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute ).
64.
Rhoads, D. , J. Dewey and D. Michie1999Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press , 2nd edn[1982]).
65.
1984Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark ( Philadelphia: Fortress Press ).
66.
Schmidt, K.L. 1919 Der Rahmen der Geschichte Jesu: Literarkritische Untersuchungen zur ältesten Jesusüberlieferung (Berlin: Trowitzsch & Sohn).
67.
1978‘The Portrayal of the Life of Faith in the Gospel of Mark’ , Int32: 387-399 .
68.
Scott, M. P.1985‘Chiastic Structure: A Key to the Interpretation of Mark’s Gospel’ , BTB15: 17-26 .
69.
1995‘The Narrative Function of Markan Intercalation’ , NTS41: 522-540 .
70.
Smith, S.1996A Lion with Wings: A Narrative-Criticism Approach to Mark’s Gospel (Biblical Seminar, 38; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press ).
71.
Standaert, B. 1978 L’évangile selon Marc: Composition et genre littéraire (Bruge: Sint-Andriesabdij).
72.
1985‘Hinge Transitions in Mark’s Gospel’ , BTB15: 27-31 .
73.
1980‘The Structural Function of the Way (Hodos) in Mark’s Gospel’, in W. Klassen (ed.), The New Way of Jesus ( Topeka, KS: Faith and Life Press ): 73-86.
74.
repr. from JR57 (1977).
75.
Taylor, V.1966The Gospel According to St. Mark ( London: Macmillan , 2nd edn [1952]).
76.
1999The Theology of the Gospel of Mark (New Testament Theology; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
77.
Telford, W. (ed.) 1995The Interpretation of Mark (Studies in New Testament Interpretation; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark , 2nd edn [1985]).
78.
Van Oyen, G.1992‘Intercalation and Irony in the Gospel of Mark’, in F. Van Segbroecket al. (eds.), Four Gospels 1992: Festschrift Frans Neirynck (BETL, 100; Leuven: Peeters): II , 949-974.
79.
repr. of WUNT, 88; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1997).
80.
Witherington, B.2001The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary ( Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ).
81.
Wright, G.A., Jr 1985 ‘Markan Intercalations: A Study in the Plot of the Gospel’ (PhD dissertation, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary).
