Although complex reasons exist for the poor state of education in socio-economically challenged communities in South Africa, improving parental support to learners is one approach to buffer contextual adversities. Yet, historically, collaboration between school and parent has been problematic. We hypothesized that a participatory action research approach might be useful to develop positive relations between teachers and parents. We report on the benefits of a PAR project undertaken by seven community parents and five teachers to enhance learner support in a primary school situated in a low-income area. Thematic analysis of focus group interviews with participants, triangulated by transcriptions of a final project workshop, revealed that participation in the PAR process enabled i) the development of contextually relevant content for an educational programme; ii) change in the assumptions of parents and teachers about their respective roles in supporting the child; iii) the personal/technical skills development of participants; and iv) positive outcomes beyond the project. The insights gain from this study highlight the benefits of PAR to enable schools to harness the wealth of knowledge and skills that exist in their community to enhance learner support and improve the quality of teaching and learning.
BasarabaA. (2013). Portals of promise: Transforming beliefs and practices through a curriculum of parents. Sense Publishers.
2.
BanerjiR.BerryJ.ShotlandM. (2015). The impact of mother literacy and participation programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 303–337.
3.
BelskyJ.VandellD. L.BurchinalM.Clarke-StewartK. A.McCartneyK.OwenM. T, & The NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care?Child Development, 78, 681–701.
4.
BryanJ.HenryL. (2012). A model for building school–family–community partnerships: Principles and process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90, 408–420.
ChambersR. (2008). PRA, PLA and pluralism: Practice and theory. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), The sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 297–318). Sage.
7.
CrozierG.DaviesJ. (2006). Family matters: A discussion of the Bangladeshi and Pakistani extended family and community in supporting the children’s education. The Sociological Review, 54, 678–695.
8.
DamonsB. P. (2017). A collaboratively constructed process model for understanding and supporting the work of the community volunteer in a community school [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. NMMU, Port Elizabeth.
9.
EpsteinJ. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
10.
Fals BordaO. (2006). The North-South convergence: A 30-year first-person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306066806.
11.
FreireP. (1968). The pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
12.
GoodallJ. (2013). Parental engagement to support children's learning: A six point model. School Leadership & Management, 33, 133–150.
13.
GoodallJ. (2017). Narrowing the achievement gap: Parental engagement with children’s learning. Routledge.
14.
GoodallJ. (2018). Leading for parental engagement: Working towards partnership. School Leadership & Management, 38, 143–146.
15.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation. Sage.
16.
JuanA.VisserM. (2017). Home and school environmental determinants of science achievement of South African students. South African Journal of Education, 37, 1–10.
17.
KemmisS.McTaggartR.NixonR. (2019). Critical participatory action research. In Zuber-SkerrittO.WoodL. (Eds.), Action learning and action research: Genres and approaches (pp. 179–192). Emerald Publishing Limited.
18.
KumashiroK. K. (2015). Against common sense: Teaching and learning toward social justice. Routledge.
19.
LedwithM. (2016). Community development in action. Policy Press.
20.
MakgopaM.MokheleM. (2013). Teachers' perceptions on parental involvement: A case study of two South African schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 219–225.
21.
McAteer, M., & Wood, L. (2018). Decolonising knowledge: Enacting the civic role of the university in a community-based project. South African Journal of Education, 38(4): 1–10.
22.
McMillonG. T. (2016). School–university–community collaboration: Building bridges at the water's edge. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60, 375–381.
23.
MaringeF.MasinireA.NkambuleT. (2015). Distinctive features of schools in multiple deprived communities in South Africa: Implications for policy and leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 363–385.
24.
MestryR.KhumaloJ. (2012). Governing bodies and learner discipline: Managing rural schools in South Africa through a code of conduct. South African Journal of Education, 32, 97–110.
25.
MichaelS.WolhuterC. C.van WykN. (2012). The management of parental involvement in multicultural schools in South Africa: A case study. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2, 57–82.
26.
MunjeP. N.MncubeV. (2018). The lack of parent involvement as hindrance in selected public primary schools in South Africa: The voices of educators. Perspectives in Education, 36, 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v36i1.6
27.
MyendeP. E.NhlumayoB. S. (2020). Enhancing parent–teacher collaboration in rural schools: Parents’ voices and implications for schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education,1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1731764
28.
OkekeC. I. (2014). Effective home-school partnership: Some strategies to help strengthen parental involvement. South African Journal of Education, 34, 1–9.
29.
OwenA.AndersonB. (2017). Informal community support for parents of pre-school children: A comparative study investigating the subjective experience of parents attending community-based toddler groups in different socio-economic situations. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15, 212–224.
30.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196.
31.
PrewM. (2009). Community involvement in school development modifying school improvement concepts to the needs of South African township schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 824–846.
32.
PushorD.AmendtT. (2018). Leading an examination of beliefs and assumptions about parents. School Leadership & Management, 38, 202–221.
33.
PushorD., & The Parent Engagement Collaborative. (2013). Portals of promise: Transforming beliefs and practices through a curriculum of parents. Sense Publishers.
34.
ReayD. (2008). Psychosocial aspects of white Middle-class identities: Desiring and defending against the class and ethnic ‘other’ in urban multi-ethnic schooling. Sociology, 42, 1072–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508096934
35.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
36.
SpaullN. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 436–447.
37.
SpaullN. (2015). Schooling in South Africa: How low-quality education becomes a poverty trap. South African Child Gauge, 12, 34–41.
VisweswaranK. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. University of Minnesota Press.
40.
Wood, L., & McAteer, M. (2017). Levelling the Playing Fields in PAR: The Intricacies of Power, Privilege, and Participation in a University–Community–School Partnership. 67(4): 251–264. Adult Education Quarterly DOI: 10.1177/0741713617706541. 1–15.
41.
Wood, L. (2020). Participatory action learning and action research: Theory, process and practice. Routledge.
