This research examines the Nice 2 Meet U intervention program which, unlike other programs promoting dialogue between Arab/Palestinian and Jewish students on Israeli campuses, was a grassroots program initiated and moderated by students. The program was designed jointly by the initiators, the participants and the researcher/advisor using action research. The objective of the current study was to describe the negotiations among all the partners with respect to a central dilemma: should the program include political discourse on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? The research proposes seeing the negotiations over designing grassroots conflict intervention programs as an arena in which the participants' academic, ethno-national and gender positions intersect and shape knowledge-power relations. Alongside the risks inherent in this process, it also offers potential for creating transformative spaces that challenge traditional patterns of power relations and encourage students to take part in changing the social atmosphere on campus.
Abu RasT.MaayanY. (2014). Arabic and Arab culture on Israeli campuses: An updated look.
Dirasat, The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute, Sikkuy (in Hebrew).
2.
Abu-NimerM. (2004).
Education for coexistence and Arab‐Jewish encounters in Israel: Potential and challenges. Journal of Social Issues,
60, 405–422.
3.
ArieliD.FriedmanV. J. (2013).
Negotiating reality: Conflict transformation in natural spaces of encounter. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
49, 308–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313485128
ArieliD.FriedmanV. J.HirschfeldM. J. (2012).
Challenges on the path to cultural safety in nursing education. International Nursing Review,
59, 187–193.
6.
Bar-OnD. (2006). Tell your life story: Creating dialogue among Jews and Germans, Israelis and Palestinians.
Central European University Press.
7.
Bar‐OnD.KassemF. (2004).
Storytelling as a way to work through intractable conflicts: The German‐Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian‐Israeli context. Journal of Social Issues,
60, 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00112.x
8.
BekermanZ. (2007).
Rethinking intergroup encounters: Rescuing praxis from theory, activity from education, and peace/co‐existence from identity and culture. Journal of Peace Education,
4, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400200601171198
9.
Ben-AriR. (2004).
Coping with the Jewish‐Arab conflict: A comparison among three models. Journal of Social Issues,
60, 307–322.
10.
BoimelY.ZeaviE.TotriM. (2009). What do Jewish and Arab students learn from each other. Kiryat Tiv’on: Oranim Academic College of education (in Hebrew).
11.
BremnerD. L. (2006). Human needs and problem solving approaches to creating social structures: Action research on conflict resolution in Georgia, 2000–2002 [Doctoral dissertation].
London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
ElderC. (2016). Participatory action research (PAR), a tool for transforming conflict: A case study from South Central Somalia.
Life and Peace Institute.
14.
FoucaultM. (1972). The history of sexuality.
Penguin.
15.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133). New York: Pantheon Books.
16.
GordonS. M.EdwardsJ. L. (2012).
Enhancing student research through a virtual participatory action research project: Student benefits and administrative challenges. Action Research,
10, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750312439900
17.
HagerT.SabaT.ShayN. (2011).
Jewish Arab activism through dialogical encounters: Changing an Israeli campus. Journal of Peace Education,
8, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.589255
18.
HalabiR.SonnenscheinN. (2004).
The Jewish-Palestinian encounter in a time of crisis. Journal of Social Issues,
60, 373–387.
19.
HalabiR.SonnenscheinN.FriedmanA. (2000). To free the oppressed and the oppressors: Meetings of Arab and Jewish students in Tel Aviv university. In HalabiR. (Ed.), Dialogue between identities: Meetings of Arabs and Jews in neve shalom (pp. 113–130).
Hakibbutz Hameuchad:
Tel Aviv (in Hebrew).
20.
JacobsG. (2010).
Conflicting demands and the power of defensive routines in participatory action research. Action Research,
8, 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310366041
21.
JanesJ. E. (2016).
Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research,
14, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315579129
22.
KurmanJ.EshelY.SbeitH. (2005).
Acculturation attitudes, perceived attitudes of the majority, and adjustment of Israeli-Arab and Jewish Ethiopian students to an Israeli university. The Journal of Social Psychology,
145, 593–612.
23.
LennieJ.HatcherC.MorganW. (2003).
Feminist discourses of (dis) empowerment in an action research project involving rural women and communication technologies. Action Research,
1, 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011005
24.
LundyP.McGovernM. (2006a).
Participation, truth and partiality: Participatory action research, community-based truth-telling and post-conflict transition in Northern Ireland. Sociology,
40, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506058431
25.
LundyP.McGovernM. (2006b).
The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research,
4, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542
26.
MaozI. (2011).
Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research,
48, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310389506
27.
MaozI.Bar-OnD.YikyaS. (2007). “
They understand only force” a critical examination of the eruption of verbal violence in a Jewish-Palestinian dialogue. Peace and Conflict Studies,
14, 27–48.
28.
MaozI.SteinbergS.Bar-OnD.FakhereldeenM. (2002).
The dialogue between the ‘self’ and the ‘other’: A process analysis of Palestinian-Jewish encounters in Israel. Human Relations,
55, 931–962.
29.
NanS. A. (2011).
Consciousness in culture‐based conflict and conflict resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly,
28, 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.20022
30.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research.
Sage.
31.
RossM. H. (2001).
Action evaluation in the theory and practice of conflict resolution. Peace and Conflict Studies,
8, 1–15.
32.
RothmanJ. (1997).
Action-evaluation and conflict resolution: In theory and practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly,
15, 119–131.
33.
SchirchL.CamptD. (2007). The little book of dialogue for difficult subjects.
Good Books.
34.
SuleimanR. (2004).
Planned encounters between Jewish and Palestinian Israelis: A social‐psychological perspective. Journal of Social Issues,
60, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00113.x
