AbmaT. A. (2019).
Dialogue and deliberation: New approaches to including patients in setting health and healthcare research agendas. Action Research,
17(4), 429–450.
2.
AbmaT.BanksS.CookT.DiasS.Madsen. J. SpringettW.WrightM. T. (2019). Participatory research for health and social well-being.
Berlin:
Springer.
3.
AbmaT. A.BroerseJ. E. (2010).
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expectations,
13(2), 160–173.
4.
AlvessonM.HardyC.HarleyB. (2008).
Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies,
45(3), 480–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
5.
BateP.RobertG. (2006).
Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. BMJ Quality & Safety,
15(5), 307–310.
BradburyH. (2015). The sage handbook of action research (3rd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
SAGE.
8.
BradburyH.GlenzerK.KuB.ColumbiaD.KjellströmS.AragónA. O., … GrayP. (2019b).
What is good action research: Quality choice points with a refreshed urgency. Action Research,
17(1), 14–18. doi:10.1177/1476750319835607
9.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019a).
A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research,
17(1), 3–10. doi:10.1177/1476750319829633
10.
Bradbury-Huang, H. (2010).
What is good action research?Why the resurgent interest? Action Research,
8(1), 93–109. doi:10.1177/1476750310362435
11.
ChandlerD.TorbertB. (2003).
Transforming inquiry and action: Interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Research,
1(2), 133–152.
12.
ChinnD. (2007).
Reflection and reflexivity. Clinical Psychology Forum,
178, 15–18.
13.
DonnellyS.MortonS. (2019).
Creating organisational and practice change through the use of co-operative inquiry groups in healthcare settings. Action Research,
17(4), 451–468.
14.
EatonA. D.TsangA. K. T., CraigL. C.GinocchioG. F. (2019). Peer researchers in post-professional healthcare: A glimpse at motivations and partial objectivity as opportunities for action researchers. Action Research,
17(4), 591–609. doi:10.1177/1476750318811913
15.
Erfan, A., & Torbert, B. (2015). Collaborative developmental action inquiry. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (pp. 64–75). doi: 10.4135/9781473921290.n7
16.
FriedmanV. J.GrayP.Ortiz AragónA. (2018).
From doing to writing action research: A plea to ARJ authors. Action Research,
16(1), 3–6. doi:10.1177/1476750318763041
17.
Greenhalgh, T., Hinton, L., Finlay, T., Macfarlane, A., Fahy, N., Clyde, B., & Chant, A. (2019). Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expectations. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888
18.
GustavssonS., M. K.AnderssonT. (2019).
Patient involvement 20: Experience-based co-design supported by action research. Action Research,
17(4), 469–491.
19.
HansenC. E. (2006). Successful qualitative health research.
Maidenhead, England:
OU Press.
20.
KarlssonL. K.RingsbergK. C.CrondahlK. (2019).
Work-integrated learning and health literacy as catalysts for Roma empowerment and social inclusion: A participatory action research. Action Research,
17(4), 549–572. doi: 10.1177/1476750317702951
21.
KiraM.LifvergrenS. (2013). Sowing seeds for sustainability in work systems (Chapter 2). In: I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. Zink (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainability and Human Resource Management (pp. 57–81). Berlin: Springer.
22.
KjellströmS. (2009).
The ethics of promoting and assigning adult developmental exercises: A critical analysis of the immunity to change process. Integral Review,
5(2), 116–132.
23.
KjellströmS. (2010).
Responsibility and ethics in the use and advocacy of developmental exercises: Response to Zeitler and Reams. Integral Review,
6(1), 19–28.
24.
KjellströmS.Areskoug-JosefssonK.GäreB. A.AnderssonA. C.OckanderM.KällJ., … RobertG. (2019).
Exploring, measuring and enhancing the coproduction of health and well-being at the national, regional and local levels through comparative case studies in Sweden and England: The ‘Samskapa’ research programme protocol. BMJ Open,
9(7), e029723.
25.
LipmanowiczH.McCandlessK. (2013). The surprising power of liberating structures: Simple rules to unleash a culture of innovation.
Seattle, WA:
Liberating Structures Press.
26.
MannJ.HungL. (2019). Co-research with people living with dementia for change. Action Research,
17(4), 573–590. doi:10.1177/1476750318787005
27.
MitchellH. A.AllanH.KochT. (2017).
Guyanese expatriate women ask: “Is it a touch of sugar?”Action Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1476750317721303
28.
PlazasP. C.CameronB. L.MilfordK.HuntL. R.Bourque-BearskinL.SalasA. S. (2019). Engaging Indigenous youth through popular theatre: Knowledge mobilization of Indigenous peoples’ perspectives on access to healthcare services. Action Research,
17(4), 492–509. doi:10.1177/1476750318789468
29.
RobertG.CornwellJ.LocockL.PurushothamA.SturmeyG.Gager Melanie. (2015).
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.BMJ,
350, g7714.
30.
SchönD. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner.
New York:
Basic Books.
31.
WoeldersS.AbmaT. (2019).
Participatory action research to enhance the collective involvement of residents in elderly care: About power, dialogue and understanding.Action Research,
17(4), 528–548. doi: 10.1177/1476750319837330
