Young mothers are often socially and economically marginalized, and tend to be discussed as one homogenous, high-risk, deficit-based group. They are frequently excluded from youth participatory action research and youth leadership research, which leaves little space for considering them as engaged citizens or leaders. To contribute to filling this gap, I created and implemented, in collaboration with a group of 11 young mothers, a policy-focused participatory research project called Engage for Change. My objectives included generating youth-based research evidence for informing public policy; exploring intersectionality as a theoretical foundation for participatory research with young mothers; and better understanding the impacts of participatory research on young mothers’ leader and collective efficacy. In this article, I describe the implementation of Engage for Change, highlighting the work of participating young mothers. I explore intersectionality as a theoretical foundation, and consider the leader and collective efficacy development of participants, with the goal of: 1) contributing to the sparse literature on participatory research with young mothers; 2) suggesting that intersectionality is a useful theoretical foundation for participatory research with young mothers; and 3) highlighting participants’ leader and collective efficacy, while acknowledging persistent systemic exclusions they face in exercising leadership and engagement.
BanduraA. (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist37(2): 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
2.
BeckleyT. M.MartzD.NadeauS.WallE.ReimerB. (2008) Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: Delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. Journal of Rural and Community Development3(3): 56–75.
3.
BedollaL. G. (2007) Intersections of inequality: Understanding marginalization and privilege in the post-civil rights era. Politics & Gender3(2): 232–247. doi:10.1017/S1743923X07000050.
4.
BlackburnJ. (2000) Understanding Paulo Freire: Reflections on the origins, concepts, and possible pitfalls of his educational approach. Community Development Journal35(1): 3–15.
5.
BrodieJ. (2008) Putting gender back in: Women and social policy reform in Canada. In: Abu-LabanY. (eds) Gendering the nation-state: Canadian and comparative perspectives, Vancouver: UBC Press.
Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_8.
8.
Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2004). See Jane run: Women candidates as political role models for adolescents. Conference Papers, Midwestern Political Science Association, 1–43. doi: mpsa_proceeding_25159.pdf.
9.
Canadian Education Statistics Council. (2010). Education indicators in Canada: An international perspective. No. 81-604-X. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
10.
CarrJ. (2011) Activist research and city politics: Ethical lessons from youth-based public scholarship. Action Research10(1): 61–78.
11.
ChakrabortyK. (2009) ‘The good Muslim girl’: Conducting qualitative participatory research to understand the lives of young Muslim women in the bustees of Kolkata. Children’s Geographies7(4): 421–434.
12.
CollinsP. H. (1991) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, New York and London: Routledge.
13.
ConradD. (2004) Exploring risky youth experience: Popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods3(1): 12–25.
14.
Czapska, A., Webb, A., & Taefi, N. (2008). More than bricks and mortar: A rights-based strategy to prevent girl homelessness in Canada. Vancouver, BC: Justice for Girls. Retrieved 12 November 2008, from http://www.justiceforgirls.org/publications/pdfs/jfg_housing_web.pdf.
15.
DennerJ.MeyerB.BeanS. (2005) Young women’s leadership alliance: Youth–adult partnerships in an all-female after-school program. Journal of Community Psychology33(1): 87–100. doi:10.1002/jcop.20036.
16.
DhamoonR. K. (2011) Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly64(1): 230–243.
17.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007) Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
FairhurstG. (2007) Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
20.
FellowsM. L.RazackS. (1998) The race to innocence: Confronting hierarchical relations among women. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice1: 335–352.
21.
FineM. (2009) Postcards from metro America: Reflections on youth participatory action research for urban justice. Urban Review41: 1–6.
22.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2004) Re-membering exclusions: Participatory action research in public institutions. Qualitative Research in Psychology1(1): 15–37.
23.
Frankenburg, E. (2004). Sometimes it takes a village: Collective efficacy and children's use of preventive health care. On-Line Working Paper Series. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. Retrieved 15 March 2011, from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/71x2m8dv.
24.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (trans. Myra Bergman Ramos). New York: Herder and Herder.
25.
FreyA. F.CrossC. (2011) Overcoming poor youth stigmatization and invisibility through art: A participatory action research experience in Greater Buenos Aires. Action Research9(1): 65–82.
26.
FrisbyW.MaguireP.ReidC. (2009) The ‘f’ word has everything to do with it: How feminist theories inform action research. Action Research7(1): 13–29.
27.
Gidengil, E., O’Neill, B., & Young, L. (2008). Her mother’s daughter? The influence of childhood socialization on women’s political engagement. In: Conference papers – Canadian Political Science Association, 4–6 June. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, 1–19. Retrieved 22 April 2011, from http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2008/Gidengil-O’Neill-Young.pdf.
GreeneS. (2007) Including young mothers: Community-based participation and the continuum of active citizenship. Community Development Journal42(2): 167–180. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi096.
31.
Greene-Moton, E., Palermo, A., Flicker, S., & Travers, B. (2006). Unit 4: Trust and communication in a CBPR partnership: Spreading the glue and having it stick. Retrieved 6 December 2008, from www.cbprcurriculum.info.
32.
HankivskyO.CormierR. (2010) Intersectionality and public policy: Some lessons from existing models. Political Research Quarterly64(1): 217–229. doi:10.1177/1065912910376385.
33.
HannahS. T.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.HarmsP. D. (2008) Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly19(6): 669–692. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007.
34.
HoytM.KennedyC. (2008) Leadership and adolescent girls: A qualitative study of leadership development. American Journal of Community Psychology42(3–4): 203–219.
35.
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
King, K. E., Ross, L. E., Bruno, T. L., & Erickson, P. G. (2009). Identity work among street-involved young mothers. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(2), 139–149. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13676260802691333.
37.
KomivesS. R.LongerbeamS. D.OwenJ. E.MainellaF. C.OsteenL. (2006) A leadership identity development model: Applications from a grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development47(4): 401–417.
38.
LabonteR. (2004) Social inclusion/exclusion and health: Dancing the dialectic. In: RaphaelD. (eds) Social determinants of health: Canadian perspectives, Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, pp. 253–266.
McHughT. F.KowalskiK. C. (2009) Lessons learned: Participatory action research with young Aboriginal women. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health7(1): 117–131.
Parken, A., & Young, H. (2008). Facilitating cross-strand working. Unpublished report for the Welsh Assembly Government.
45.
Posner, J., Kayastha, P., Davis, D., Limoges, J., O’Donnell, C., & Yue, K. (2009). Development of leadership self-efficacy and collective efficacy: Adolescent girls across castes as peer educators in Nepal. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 4(3), 284–302. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/17441690902783157.
46.
RaphaelD. (2004) Social determinants of health: Canadian perspectives, Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
47.
ReidC.FrisbyW. (2008) Continuing the journey: Articulating dimensions of feminist participatory research (FPAR). In: ReasonP.BradburyH. (eds) The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 93–105.
RussellS. T.MuracoA.SubramaniamA.LaubC. (2009) Youth empowerment and high school gay-straight alliances. Journal of Youth and Adolescence38(7): 891–903. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9382-8.
50.
SenbelM. (2007) Engaging youth to engage community in sustainable grassroots planning. Children, Youth and Environments17(2): 454–456.
51.
TaefiN. (2009) The synthesis of age and gender: Intersectionality, international human rights law and the marginalisation of the girl-child. International Journal of Children’s Rights17(3): 345–376. doi:10.1163/157181809X458049.
Weis, L., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States Schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zeldin, S., Petrokubi, J., & MacNeil, C. (2008). Youth-adult partnerships in decision making: Disseminating and implementing an innovative idea into established organizations and communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2008(41), 262–277.
