Our research may not emerge in the tidy, linear manner often described in research papers, and hoped for outcomes may never eventuate. Amid this seeming confusion, researchers may experience personal discomfort and perceptions of failure. Drawing on my experiences as a doctoral candidate I address two of the areas for which my own reading of literature left me ill-prepared. I focus first on the emergent nature of action research, and second on the contributions reflection can make to our development as action researchers. Students and teachers of action research are encouraged to appreciate the richness and variety of experiences which interaction and engagement in the research process may bring, for it is these activities which shape our development as researchers.
Barge, J.K., & Oliver, C. (2003). Working with appreciation in managerial practice . Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 124—142.
2.
Bartlett, S. (1987). Introduction: Varieties of self-reference. In S. J. Bartlett, & P. Suber (Eds.), Self-reference: Reflections on reflexivity (pp. 5—28). Dordecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
3.
Burgess, J. (2006). Participatory action research. First person perspectives of a graduate student. Action Research, 4(4), 419—437.
4.
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2000). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. In D. Cooperrider, P. F. J. Sorensen, D. Whitney , & T. F. Yaeger (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: Rethinking human organization towards a positive theory of change (pp. 3—26). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing LCC.
5.
Eikeland, O. (2001). Action research as the hidden curriculum of the Western tradition. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 145—155). London: Sage.
6.
Glaze, J. (2002). PhD study and the use of a reflective diary: A dialogue with self. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 153—166.
7.
Grant, S.L. (2003). Lessons from the field. Paper presented at the 7th Student Research Conference, Waikato Management School, University of Waikato.
8.
Grant, S.L. (2004). A critical approach to appreciative inquiry: Bridging the apparent paradox? Paper presented at the Qualitative Research in Business Symposium, Massey University, Albany Campus, New Zealand.
9.
Grant, S.L. (2005). Reflections on the research process. Paper presented at the Qualitative Research in Business Symposium , Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.
10.
Grant, S.L. (2006). A paradox in action? A critical analysis of an appreciative inquiry. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
11.
Grant, S.L., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox? Action Research, 4(4), 401—418.
12.
Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn, pp. 379—400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Marshall, J. (1981). Making sense as personal process. In P. Reason, & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research (pp. 395—99). Chichester: Wiley .
14.
Mellor, N. (2001). Messy method: The unfolding story. Educational Action Research, 9(3), 465—484.
15.
Mirvis, P.H., & Berg, D.N. (1977). Failures in organization development and change. Cases and essays for learning. New York: Wiley.
16.
Reason, P., & Marshall, J. (2001). On working with graduate research students. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 413—419). London: Sage.
17.
Rogers, P.J., & Fraser, D. (2003). Appreciating appreciative inquiry. In H. Preskill, & A. T. Coghlan (Eds.), Using appreciative inquiry in evaluation (pp. 75—84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
18.
Ross, D. (1995). Aristotle (6th edn). London: Routledge.
19.
Sarah, R., Haslett, T., Molineux, J., Olsen, J., Stephens, J., Tepe, S., & Walker, B. (2002). Business action research in practice — A strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organisations . Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(6), 535—546.
20.
Torbert, W.R. (2001). The practice of action inquiry. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 250—260). London: Sage.
