The thesis as a bulky `tome' with a traditional structure —literature review, methodology, research design, findings and conclusions — is a concept under increasing challenge. Recently, I completed a doctoral action research project based on environmental education in a primary school. However, I found that trying to force the action research process into a linear writing structure was an unsatisfactory experience. After much anxiety and considerable experimentation, I resolved the problem of `fit' between action research and the traditional thesis format by creating an alternative architecture based on each of the action research cycles. While still producing a bulky `doorstopper', I feel this structure is a better reflection of the way the study evolved. This article outlines this new architecture and discusses its rationale. It also challenges other action researchers to innovate and experiment with the ways they represent their research work. Licence for such innovation is rapidly developing especially with the advent of digital thesis production and performative theses. I see no reason why action researchers cannot be leaders in the creation of new forms of practice about how research theses and dissertations are represented in the academy.
Bamford, A. (2005). The art of research: Digital theses in the arts . Paper presented at the ETD2005: Evolution through Discovery: 8th International Symposium, Sydney.
2.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Afterthought: On writing, on writing social science . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1089—1098). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
4.
Burchell, H., & Dyson, J. (2000). Just a little story: The use of stories to aid reflection on teaching in higher education. Educational Action Research, 8(3), 435—450.
5.
Conle, C. (2000). Thesis as narrative or `What is the inquiry in narrative inquiry?'. Curriculum Inquiry, 30(2), 189—214.
6.
Davis, J. (2003). Innovation through action research in environmental education: From project to praxis. Brisbane: Griffith University.
7.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1—28). London: Sage.
8.
Dick, B. (1993). You want to do an action research thesis? How to conduct and report action research. Retrieved 20 March 2000 , from: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/art/arthesis.html .
9.
Edminster, J. (2003). Resistance to ETDs in academe: diffusion of innovation . Paper presented at the ETD 2003: Next Steps: Electronic Theses and Dissertations Worldwide, Berlin.
10.
Eisner, E.W. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15—20.
11.
Eisner, E.W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4—10.
12.
Elliott, J. (1994). Developing community-focused environmental education through action-research. In B. Somekh & M. Pettigrew (Eds.), Evaluating innovation in environmental education (pp. 31—60). Paris: OECD.
13.
Fien, J. (1993). Education for the environment: Critical curriculum theorising and environmental education. Geelong: Deakin University and Griffith University.
14.
Goodson, I., & Walker, R. (1995). Telling tales. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, and research (pp. 184—194). New York : Teachers College Press.
15.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1995). The narrative nature of pedagogical content knowledge . In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning, and research (pp. 24—38). New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Hart, P. (2002). Narrative, knowing, and emerging methodologies in environmental education research: Issues of quality. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 140—165.
17.
James, P. (1999). Rewriting narratives of self: Reflections from an action research study. Educational Action Research, 7(1), 85—103.
18.
Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91—102). London : Sage.
19.
Lather, P.A., & Smithies, C.S. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20.
Lincoln, Y. (1997). From understanding to action: New imperatives, new criteria, new methods for interpretative researchers. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
21.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163—188). London: Sage.
22.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (2005). Epilogue: The eighth and ninth moments — qualitative research in/and the fractured future. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1115—1126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Ramsey, C. (2005). Narrating development: Professional practice emerging within stories. Action Research, 3(3), 279—295.
24.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923—948). London: Sage.
25.
Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. (2005). Writing: a method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959—975). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1993). Research in environmental education: Engaging the debate. Geelong: Deakin University and Griffith University.
27.
Stapleton, A., & Taylor, P. (2004). Representing the flow of r and d in a thesis: Diachronic structure and hyperlinking. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Researchers in Education, Melbourne.
28.
Tilbury, D., Coleman, V., & Garlick, D. (2005). A national review of environmental education and its contribution to sustainability in Australia: School education. Canberra: Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability.
29.
Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research? Retrieved 8 March 1998 from: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html .
30.
Winter, R. (1996). Some principles and procedures for the conduct of action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 13—27). Bristol: Falmer Press.
31.
Winter, R. (1998). Finding a voice — thinking with others: A conception of action research. Educational Action Research , 6(1), 53—68.
