Engaging communities of practice for risk communication in the Hawkesbury Water Recycling Scheme

Abstract

Sustainable conceptions of urban water management include the recycling of treated effluent and urban stormwater as valued resources. The future acceptability and confidence in these initiatives depends upon pluralist approaches for communicating and managing associated risks. The case study described here focuses on risk communication and management associated with the Hawkesbury Water Recycling Scheme near Sydney, Australia. Action research strategies with communities of practice have contributed to the co-construction of effective risk management strategies. These strategies are both informed by differentiated perspectives and practices, and supported by a network of coordinated information. The focus on communities of practice is discussed in relation to pragmatic approaches to action research and systemic inquiry, along with the implications for the role of universities in engaging with the complex issues of sustainability.

Keywords

co-construction communities of practice risk communication water recycling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Zubari, W. K. (1998). Towards the establishment of a total water cycle management and re-use program in the GCC countries . Desalination, 120(1-2), 3-14 .

ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council) (2000). An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. National Water Quality Management Strategy, No.4a. Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra .

Attwater, R. (1999). Pragmatist philosophy and soft systems in an upland Thai catchment . Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 16, 299-309 .

Attwater, R. (2000). Pluralism, economic rhetoric, and common property . Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(4), 543-557 .

Attwater, R. , Booth, S. , Davey, P. , & Guthrie, A. (2002). Opportunities for investment in stormwater and wastewater in the Hawkesbury-Nepean . Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 9(3), 169-184 .

Booth, C. A. , Attwater, R. , Derry, C. , & Simmons, B. (2003). The Hawkesbury Water Reuse Scheme . Water - Journal of the Australian Water Association, 30(5), 42-44 .

Brown, J. S. , & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organisation: A social - practice perspective . Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213 .

Brulin, G. (2001). The third task of universities or how to get universities to serve their communities! In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 440-446). London: Sage .

Checkland, P. , & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons .

10.

Derry, C. W. , Booth, S. , & Attwater R. (2003). A risk management approach to sustainable water reuse . Environmental Health, 3(1), 78-86 .

11.

Grimble, R. , Man-Kwun C. , Aglionby, J. , & Quan, J. (1995). Trees and trade-offs: A stakeholder approach to natural resource management. Gatekeeper Series No. 52, International Institute for Environment and Development, London .

12.

Kolb, D. A. (1974). On management and the learning process. In Organisational psychology: A book of readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .

13.

Lang, R. (1986). Achieving integration in resource planning. In R. Lang , (Ed.), Integrated approaches to resource planning and management. Alberta: University of Calgary Press .

14.

Levin, M. , & Greenwood, D. (2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 103-113). London: Sage .

15.

Maani, K. E. , & Cavana, R. Y. (2000). Systems thinking and modelling: understanding change and complexity. Auckland: Pearson Education .

16.

Macadam, B. , Drinan, J. , Inall, N. , & McKenzie, B. (2003). The inter-relationships between capacity building and institutional arrangements, and the implications for rural extension . Invited paper presented at APEN (Asia-Pacific Extension Network) National Forum, Hobart, 26-28 November.

17.

Midgley, G. (1996). What is this thing called CST? In R. L. Flood and N. R. A. Romm (Eds.), Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York: Plenum Press .

18.

Midgley, G. (1997). Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In A. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. New York: John Wiley and Sons .

19.

Reason, P. , & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1-14). London: Sage .

20.

Swan, J. , Scarbrough, H. , & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation . Management learning, 33(4), 477-496 .

21.

Vlachos, E. , & Braga, B. (2001). The challenge of urban water management. In C. Maksimovic & J. A. Tejada-Guibert (Eds.), Frontiers in urban water management: Deadlock or hope (pp. 1-36). London: IWA Publishing .

22.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems . Organisation, 7(2), 225-246 .

23.

Wilson, K. , & Morren, G. E. B. (1990). Systems approaches for improvement in agriculture and resource management. New York: MacMillan .