Members of the editorial board of Action Research responded to the question, `Why action research?' Based on their responses and the authors' own experiences as action researchers, this article examines common themes and commitments among action researchers as well as exploring areas of disagreement and important avenues for future exploration. We also use this opportunity to welcome readers of this new journal and to introduce them to members of the editorial board.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackoff, Russell (1999) Ackoff's best. New York: John Wiley & Sons .
2.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge .
3.
Brydon-Miller, M., Maguire, P., & McIntyre, A. (in press). Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group .
4.
Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: The New Press .
5.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (Eds.). (2000). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
6.
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70-80). London: Sage Publications .
7.
Greenwood, D. (2002). Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges . Concepts and Transformation, 7(2), 117-139 .
8.
Guijt, I., & Shah, M. K. (1998). The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development. London: IT Publications .
9.
Hermes, M. (1999). Research methods as a situated response: Toward a First Nations' methodology. In L. Parker, D. Deyhle, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Race is... race isn't: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education (pp. 83-100). Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
10.
Kasl, E., & Yorks, L. (2002). An extended epistemology for transformative learning theory and its application through collaborative inquiry. TCRecord Online. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10878
11.
Kelly, J. G., Azelton, L. S., Lardon, C., Mock, L. O., & Tandon, S. D. (in press). On community leadership: Stories about collaboration in action research . American Journal of Community Psychology.
12.
Lewin, K. (1951) Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper .
13.
McClintock, A., Mufti, A., & Shohat, E. (Eds.). (1997). Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
14.
Mead, G. (2002). Developing ourselves as police leaders: How can we inquire collaboratively in a hierarchical organization? In P. Reason (Ed.), Special Issue: The Practice of Co-operative Inquiry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(3), 191-206 .
15.
Morawski, J. (2001). Feminist research methods: Bringing culture to science. In D. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 57-75). New York: New York University Press .
16.
Parker, L., Deyhle, D., & Villenas, S. (Eds.). (1999). Race is... race isn't: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in Education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
17.
Reason, P. (1993). Reflections on sacred experience and sacred science . Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(3), 273-283 .
18.
Reason, P. (1998). Political, epistemological, ecological and spiritual dimensions of participation . Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 4(2), 147-167 .
19.
Reason, P. (2000). Listen, little man! Reflections one dark morning . Original Blessing: A Creation Spirituality Network Newsletter, 2(6), 6-8 .
20.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage Publications .
21.
Sherman, F., & Torbert, W. (2000). Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action: New paradigms for crossing the theory/practice divide in universities and communities. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
22.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed .
23.
Wildman, S., & Davis, A. (1996). Making systems of privilege visible. In S. Wildman (Ed.), Privilege revealed: How invisible preference undermines America (pp. 7-24). New York: New York University Press .
24.
Wilson, M., & Whitmore, E. (2000). Seed of fire: Social development in an era of globalism. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing .
25.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Farquhar, M. (2002). Action learning, action research and process management (ALARPM): A personal history . The Learning Organization, 9(3), 102-113 .
