There is a growing recognition that using engineering design process as an approach to integrate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) produces good learning outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of an integrated STEM with Design Thinking (iSTEM-DT) module on preschoolers’ science process skills. It adopts a single case study evaluation design in a private preschool, with two teachers and 20 preschoolers. These preschoolers were paired up and divided into two classes. They attended the iSTEM-DT lessons in the afternoon, for an hour daily, for about 4 weeks during the module implementation. Qualitative data such as fieldnotes, artefacts, photos and video recordings were collected from classroom observations. Data were also collected from teachers during reflection sessions after each lesson, while parents were interviewed at the end of the study. The data were analysed inductively through thematic analysis process. It was found that the iSTEM-DT module helped in developing preschoolers’ science process skills, namely observing, classifying, measuring, making inferences, predicting, and communicating skills, and some other higher order thinking skills. It implies that preschool teachers with basic qualification in Early Childhood Education, can have the self-efficacy to facilitate an integrated STEM curriculum if the support system is provided.
AdamNAHalimL (2019) Cabaran pengintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan, September, 1–10.
2.
AdnanMAyobAOngET, et al (2016) Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di peringkat kanakkanak: Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space12(1): 29–36.
3.
AldemirJKermaniH (2017) Integrated STEM curriculum: Improving educational outcomes for Head Start children. Early Child Development and Care187(11): 1694–1706.
4.
AllenPJChangRGorrallBK, et al (2019) From quality to outcomes: a national study of afterschool STEM programming. International Journal of STEM Education6(1): 37.
5.
AndersonJ (2020) Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
6.
AndersonJWilsonKTullyD, et al (2019) “Can We Build the Wind Powered Car Again?” students’ and teachers’ responses to a new integrated STEM curriculum. Journal of Research in STEM Education5(1): 20–39.
7.
AsigiganSISamurY (2021) The effect of gamified stem practices on students’ intrinsic motivation, critical thinking disposition levels, and perception of problem-solving skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology9(2): 332–352.
8.
Ata-AktürkADemircanHÖ (2021) Supporting preschool children’s STEM learning with parent-involved early engineering education. Early Childhood Education Journal49(4): 607–621.
9.
BagiatiAEvangelouD (2015) Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal23(1): 112–128.
10.
BagiatiAEvangelouD (2016) Practicing engineering while building with blocks: identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal24(1): 67–85.
11.
BaharinNKamarudinNManafUKA (2018) Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences8(7): 810–821.
12.
BenekIAkcayB (2022) The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research9(2): 25–52.
13.
BiggsJ (1996) Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education32(3): 347–364.
14.
BraunVClarkeVTerryG (2014) Thematic Analysis. In: RohlederPLyonsA (eds). Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology. Basingstoke: Paqlgrave MacMillan.
15.
CameronL (2020) A robot took my job! How STEM education might prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Curriculum Perspectives40(2): 233–239.
16.
CampbellCSpeldewindeCHowittC, et al (2018) STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education09(01): 11–25.
17.
ChangDHwangGJChangSC, et al (2021) Promoting students’ cross-disciplinary performance and higher order thinking: A peer assessment-facilitated STEM approach in a mathematics course. Educational Technology Research and Development69(6): 3281–3306.
18.
CookKBushSCoxR, et al (2020) Development of elementary teachers’ science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics planning practices. School Science and Mathematics120(4): 197–208.
19.
CookKLBushSB (2018) Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics118(3–4): 93–103.
20.
CunninghamC (2009) Engineering is elementary. The Bridge30(3): 11–17.
21.
CunninghamCMLachapelleCPDavisME (2018) Engineering concepts, practices, and trajectories for early childhood education. In: EnglishMoore (eds.) Early Engineering Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Singapore: Springer, pp. 135–174.
22.
DilekHTasdemirAKoncaAS, et al (2020) Preschool children’s science motivation and process skills during inquiry-based STEM activities. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health6(2): 92–104.
23.
DrakeSMReidJL (2020) 21st Century competencies in light of the history of integrated curriculum. Frontiers in Education5(122): 1–10.
24.
DubosarskyMJohnMSAnggoroF, et al (2018) Seeds of STEM: The development of a problem-based STEM curriculum for early childhood classrooms. In: EnglishMoore (eds.) Early Engineering Learning. Singapore: Springer, pp. 249–269.
25.
EnglishLD (2017) Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education15: 5–24.
26.
EnglishLD (2019) Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education29(5): 1011–1032.
27.
EnglishLDKingDT (2015) STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education2(1): 14.
28.
EnglishLDMooreTJ (2018) Early engineering learning. In: EnglishMoore (eds.) Early Engineering Learning. Singapore: Springer.
29.
FanSCYuKC (2017) How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education27(1): 107–129.
30.
FoongLVelooPDhamotharanM, et al (2018) Private sector early child care and education in Malaysia: Workforce readiness for further education. Kajian Malaysia36(1): 127–154.
31.
ForbesAFalloonGStevensonM, et al (2021) An analysis of the nature of young students’ STEM learning in 3D technology-enhanced makerspaces. Early Education and Development32(1): 172–187.
32.
HaciogluYGulhanF (2021) The effects of STEM education on the 7th grade students’ critical thinking skills and STEM perceptions. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health7(2): 139–155.
33.
HassanMNAbdullahAHIsmailN, et al (2019) Mathematics curriculum framework for early childhood education based on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education14(1): 15–31.
34.
HenriksenD (2017) Creating STEAM with design thinking: Beyond STEM and arts integration. Steam3(1): 1–11.
35.
HoTEPangV (2023) The preliminary study of an integrated STEM education with design thinking module for preschoolers. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on progressive education, 2022, pp. 503–515. The Netherlands: Atlantis Press.
36.
HoTEPangV (2024) Outcomes of an integrated STEM with design thinking module on preschoolers’ engineering practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education20(4): em2431.
37.
HolmesKMackenzieEBergerN, et al (2021) Linking K-12 STEM pedagogy to local contexts: A scoping review of benefits and limitations. Frontiers in Education6(August): 1–10.
38.
HolmlundTDLesseigKSlavitD. (2018) Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education5(1): 1–18.
39.
JohnsonRBChristensenL (2014) Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, 5th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
KartiniFSWidodoAWinarnoN, et al (2021) Promoting student’s problem-solving skills through STEM project-based learning in earth layer and disasters topic. Journal of Science Learning4(3): 257–266.
41.
KatzLG (2010) STEM in the early years some distinctions between academic and intellectual goals for young. In: Early childhood research and practice, collected papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) conference, pp. 2–7.
42.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2017) Kurikulum Standard Prasekolah Kebangsaan. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
43.
KolbDA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
44.
KurtMBenzerS. (2020) An investigation on the effect of STEM practices on sixth grade students’ academic achievement, problem solving skills, and attitudes towards STEM. Journal of Science Learning3(2): 79–88.
45.
LachapelleCPCunninghamCMJoczJ, et al (2011) Engineering is elementary: An evaluation of years 4 through 6 field testing. Paper Presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
46.
LeeMHChaiCSHongHY (2019) STEM education in asia pacific: Challenges and development. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher28(1): 1–4.
47.
LiYSchoenfeldAHdiSessaAA, et al (2019) Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research2(2): 93–104.
48.
LiYWangKXiaoY, et al (2020) Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic analysis of publicly funded projects. International Journal of STEM Education7(1): 17.
49.
LinXYangWWuL, et al (2021) Using an inquiry-based science and engineering program to promote science knowledge, problem-solving skills and approaches to learning in preschool children. Early Education and Development32(5): 695–713.
LippardCNLammMHTankKM, et al (2019) Pre-engineering thinking and the engineering habits of mind in preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal47(2): 187–198.
52.
MalcokBACeylanR (2022) The effects of STEM activities on the problem- solving skills of 6-year-old preschool children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal30(3): 423–436.
53.
McCurdyRPNickelsMBushSB (2020) Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education24(2): 22–55.
54.
MertlerCA (2016) Introduction to Educational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
MooreTJJohnsonCCGlancyAW (2020) STEM integration: A synthesis of conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: Johnson CC, Mohr-Schroeder MJ, Moore TJ and English LD (eds) Handbook of Research on STEM Education. Routledge, pp. 3–16.
56.
NachiappanSJuliaIPAbdullahN, et al (2019) Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi oleh guru dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran di tadika. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan8: 24–32.
57.
NadelsonLSSeifertAL (2017) Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. Journal of Educational Research110(3): 221–223.
58.
OmarRIsmailHAbdullahR, et al (2021) Teacher’s knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the implementation of preschool curriculum innovations. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education12(3): 37–44.
59.
OngETAyobAIbrahimN, et al (2016) Integrating STEM into early childhood education: is it feasible ?The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS)4: 336–341.
60.
ParkDYParkMHBatesAB (2018) Exploring young children’s understanding about the concept of volume through engineering design in a STEM Activity: A case study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education16(2): 275–294.
61.
PattisonSRamos MontañezSSvarovskyG (2022) Family values, parent roles, and life challenges: Parent reflections on the factors shaping long-term interest development for young children and their families participating in an early childhood engineering program. Science Education106(6): 1568–1604.
62.
PattisonSSvarovskyGRamos-MontanẽzS, et al (2020) Understanding early childhood engineering interest development as a familylevel systems phenomenon: Findings from the head start on engineering project. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research10(1): 72–89.
63.
PetersMAWhiteEJBesleyT, et al (2020) Video ethics in educational research involving children: Literature review and critical discussion. Educational Philosophy and Theory53: 863–880.
64.
RoehrigGHRouleauMDDareEA, et al (2023) Uncovering core dimensions of K-12 integrated STEM. Research in Integrated STEM Education1: 1–25.
65.
SaldanaJ (2016) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SimeonMISamsudinMAYakobN (2020) Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education32: 185–212.
67.
SungJLeeJYChunHY (2023) Short-term effects of a classroom-based STEAM program using robotic kits on children in South Korea. International Journal of STEM Education10(1): 1–18.
68.
TuranSAydoğduF (2020) Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies25(5): 4353–4363.
69.
UNICEF (2013) Ethical Research Involving Children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
70.
WangXCChoiYBensonK, et al (2021) Teacher’s role in fostering preschoolers’ computational thinking: An exploratory case study. Early Education and Development32(1): 26–48.
71.
World Bank (2023) Shaping First Steps: A Comprehensive Review of Preschool Education in Malaysia (Issue May). Washington, DC: World Bank.
72.
World Bank (2024) Bending Bamboo Shoots: Strengthening Foundational Skills (Malaysia Economic Monitor, Issue April). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
73.
YalcinVErdenŞ (2021) The effect of STEM activities prepared according to the design thinking model on preschool children’s creativity and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity41(May): 100864.
74.
YinRK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
YliverronenVMarjanenPSeitamaa-HakkarainenP (2018) Peer collaboration of six-year olds when undertaking a design task. Design and Technology Education23(2): 1–23.
