Schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports continue to be employed in elementary school settings that children attend across the globe. Such neoliberal systems of conduct teach children how to portray themselves as students so that they are ready to succeed in school and the larger society. For the most part, these systems are framed as successful behavior interventions. As a result, how such programs impact school personnel and students’ own conceptions of what it means to be a student is rarely troubled. Thus, through examining a case study of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports in a kindergarten classroom in the United States, we investigated this issue. Specifically, we employed Foucault’s conceptions of neoliberalism and biopolitics to examine how a sample of school personnel and kindergarteners made sense of their schoolwide positive behavior system. Doing so provided us with the opportunity to rethink and challenge these neoliberal systems of control.
AdairJKColegroveKSSMcmanusME (2018) Troubling messages: Agency and learning in the early schooling experiences of children of Latinx immigrants. Teachers College Record120: 1–40.
2.
AilwoodJ (2008) Learning or earning in the ‘smart state’: Changing tactics for governing early childhood. Childhood15: 535–551.
3.
BallSJ (2003) The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy18(2): 215–228.
4.
BassokDLathamSRoremA (2016) Is kindergarten the new first grade?AERA Open2(1): 1–31.
5.
BeattieP (2019) The road to psychopathology: Neoliberalism and the human mind. Journal of Social Issues75(1): 89–112.
6.
BennerGJNelsonJRSandersEA, et al. (2012) Behavior intervention for students with externalizing behavior problems: Primary-level standard protocol. Exceptional Children78(2): 181–198.
7.
BettacheKChiuCY (2019) The invisible hand is an ideology: Toward a social psychology of neoliberalism. Journal of Social Issues75(1): 8–19.
8.
BradshawCPMitchellMMLeafPJ (2010) Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions12(3): 133–148.
9.
BrownCP (2015) Conforming to reform: Teaching pre-kindergarten in a neoliberal early education system. Journal of Early Childhood Research13(3): 236–251.
10.
BrownCPEnglehardtJBarryDP, et al. (2019a) Questioning democratic notions of governance: A case study examining how a kindergarten teacher and her students give voice to and enact a neoliberal framing of schooling. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood20(3): 236–252.
11.
BrownCPEnglehardtJBarryDP, et al. (2019b) Examining how stakeholders at the local, state, and national level made sense of the changed kindergarten. American Educational Research Journal56(3): 822–867.
12.
BrownCP (2021) Resisting the Kinder-Race: Restorying Joy to Early Learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
BrownCPBarryDP (2021) Make kindergarten “funner”: Examining how kindergarteners made sense of the changed kindergarten. Teachers College Record123(6): 1–28.
14.
BrownCPFegerBSMowryBN (2018) RIGOROUS DAP in the Early Years: From Theory to Practice. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
15.
BrunilaKMertanenKTiainenK, et al. (2019) Vulnerabilizing young people: interrupting the ethos of vulnerability, the neoliberal rationality, and the precision education governance. Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society43(3): 113–120.
16.
ChitiyoJMayME (2018) Factors predicting sustainability of the schoolwide positive behavior intervention support model. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth62(2): 94–104.
17.
CoveyS (2008) The 7 Habits of Happy Kids. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
18.
De LissovoyNArmondaAJ (2020) Curriculum for liberation in the neoliberal era. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. pp.1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1086.
19.
De LissovoyNCedilloS (2016) Neoliberalism and power in education. In: PetersMA (ed.) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_155-1.
20.
EricksonF (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: WhittrockM (ed.) Handbook on Research on Teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp.119–161.
21.
FabesRAQuickMCatherineE, et al. (2021) Exclusionary discipline in US public schools: A comparative examination of use in Pre-Kindergarten and K-12 grades. Educational Studies. Epub ahead of print 18 June 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2021.1941782
22.
FassinD (2009) Another politics of life is possible. Theory Culture & Society26: 44–60.
23.
FoucaultM (1978) The History of Sexuality Volume 1: an Introduction. New York: Random House.
24.
FoucaultM (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry8: 777–795.
25.
FoucaultM (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.87–104.
26.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. trans. SheridanA.New York, NY: Vintage.
27.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. trans. BurchellG.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
GananathanR (2011) Implications of full day kindergarten program policy on early childhood pedagogy and practice. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy5(2): 33–45.
29.
GilliamWS (2005) Prekindergarteners Left Behind: Expulsion Rates in State Prekindergarten Systems. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.
30.
GilliamWSShaharG (2006) Preschool and child care expulsion and suspension: Rates and predictors in one state. Infants and Young Children19(3): 228–245.
31.
GraueME (1993) Ready for What? Constructing Meanings of Readiness for Kindergarten. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32.
HawkinsRO (2010) Introduction to the special issue: Identifying effective classwide interventions to promote positive outcomes for all students. Psychology in the Schools47: 869–870.
33.
KohnA (2008) Why self-discipline is overrated. Phi Delta Kappan90: 168–176.
34.
LamontJHDevoreCDAllisonM, et al. (2013) Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics131(3): e1000–e1007.
35.
LeeSF (2021) Governing ‘disadvantage’ through funded early years places and reconfigured spaces. Journal of Early Childhood Research19: 267–280.
36.
LemkeT (2001) ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society30(2): 190–207.
37.
LinHLLawrenceFRGorrellJ (2003) Kindergarten teachers’ views of children’s readiness for school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly18(2): 225–237.
38.
MavelliL (2017) Governing the resilience of neoliberalism through biopolitics. European Journal of International Relations23: 489–512.
39.
McDanielSCKimSGuyotteKW (2017) Perceptions of implementing positive behavior interventions and supports in high-need school contexts through the voice of local stakeholders. Journal of At-Risk Issues20(2): 35–44.
40.
McIntyreLLEckertTLFieseBH, et al. (2010) Family concerns surrounding kindergarten transition: A comparison of students in special and general education. Early Childhood Education Journal38(4): 259–263.
41.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
ParkerRThomsenBS (2019) Learning Through Play at School: A Study of Playful Integrated Pedagogies That Foster Children’s Holistic Skills Development in the Primary School Classroom. White paper. Billund: The LEGO Foundation. Available at: https://www.legofoundation.com/media/1740/learning-through-play-school.pdf
44.
ParsonsF (2017) An intervention for the intervention: Integrating positive behavioral interventions and supports with culturally responsive practices. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin83(3): 52–57.
45.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
RenoGDFriendJCaruthersL, et al. (2017) Who’s getting targeted for behavioral interventions? Exploring the connections between school culture, positive behavior support, and elementary student achievement. The Journal of Negro Education86(4): 423–438.
47.
RiddleTSinclairS (2019) Racial disparities in school-based disciplinary actions are associated with county-level rates of racial bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(17): 8255–8260.
48.
RoseN (1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Citizen. London: Routledge.
49.
SabeyCVCharltonCTPyleD, et al. (2017) A review of classwide or universal social, emotional, behavioral programs for students in kindergarten. Review of Educational Research87(3): 512–543.
50.
SaldañaJ (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th edn.London: SAGE.
51.
SharmaM (2020) Masquerade of neoliberal concepts revealed: Self-regulation skills in Ontario’s full day kindergarten program. The Canadian Journal of Action Research21(1): 87–101.
52.
SimonsM (2006) Learning as investment: Notes on governmentality and biopolitics. Educational Philosophy and Theory38: 523–540.
53.
SteedEAShaplandD (2020) Adapting social emotional multi-tiered systems of supports or kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal48(2): 135–146.
54.
SugaiGHornerR (2002) The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positivebehavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy24(1–2): 23–50.
55.
SugaiGHornerRR (2006) A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review35(2): 245–259.
56.
TobinJWuDDavidsonD (1989) Preschool in Three Cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
United States Department of Education (2014) ED and HHS Policy Statement on Expulsion and Suspension Practices in Early Learning Settings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
