The present study examined representational and non-representational activities in which children in a Head Start classroom participated. This was an investigation from the perspective of cultural-historical activity theory of how components (e.g. artifacts and division of labour) of classroom activities vary across and within types of activities. Participants included a class of 21 ethnically diverse 4- and 5-year-olds and two teachers. Data collection involved naturalistic observations of classroom members participating in indoor play, outdoor play, and notational activities (e.g. reading and drawing) over 8 days. Who was involved, artifact use, and artifact-related actions varied by activity. Furthermore, who was involved, actions, and division of labour were strongly linked in second-by-second analyses. The present study contributes research which situates children’s development within daily activities.
AshiabiGS (2007) Play in the preschool classroom: its socioemotional significance and the teacher’s role in play. Early Childhood Education Journal35: 119–207. DOI: 10.1007/s10643-007-0165-8.
2.
BakemanRQueraVGnisciA (2009) Observer agreement for timed-event sequential data: a comparison of time-based and event-based algorithms. Behavior Research Methods41: 137–147. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.137.
3.
BakemanRQueraV (2011) Sequential Analysis and Observational Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BernardHR (2000) Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
ColeM (1995) The supra-individual envelope of development: activity and practice, situation and context. In: GoodnowJJMillerPJKesselF (eds) Cultural Practices as Contexts for Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 105–118.
6.
ColeMEngeströmY (2007) Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development. In: ValsinerJRosaA (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 484–507.
7.
DaviesMM (1996) Outdoors: an important context for young children’s development. Early Child Development and Care115: 37–49. DOI: 10.1080/0300443961150104.
8.
EmfingerK (2009) Numerical conceptions reflected during multiage child-initiated pretend play. Journal of Instructional Psychology36: 326–334. Available at: http://www.projectinnovation.biz/jip_2006.html
9.
EngeströmY (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: EngeströmYMiettinenRPunamäkiR (eds) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 377–406.
10.
GauvainM (2001) The Social Context of Cognitive Development. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
GeeJP (2010) A situated-sociocultural approach to literacy and technology. In: BakerEA (ed.) The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 165–193.
12.
GöncüAGauvainM (2012) Sociocultural approaches to educational psychology: theory, research, and application. In: HarrisKRGrahamSUrdanT (eds) APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol. 1: Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 123–152.
13.
GöncüAWeberE (2000) Preschoolers’ classroom activities and interactions with peers and teachers. Early Education and Development11: 93–107. DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed1101_6.
14.
GöncüATuermerUJainJ. (1999) Children’s play as cultural activity. In: GöncüA (ed.) Children’s Engagement in the World: Sociocultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–170.
15.
GutiérrezKDRogoffB (2003) Cultural ways of learning: individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher32: 19–25. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032005019.
16.
HarrisPLKavanaughRD (1993). Young children’s understanding of pretense. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development58.
Hirsh-PasekKGolinkoffRMBerkLE. (2008) A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool: Applying the Scientific Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HolzmanL (2006) What kind of theory is activity theory?Theory & Psychology16: 5–11. DOI: 10.1177/0959354306060105.
20.
JordanBSmortiS (2010) Fearless science in the early years: co-construction in a rural childcare centre. The International Journal of Science in Society1: 85–104. Available at: http://science-society.com/publications/journal
21.
KamiiCManningM (2002) Phonemic awareness and beginning reading and writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education17: 38–46. DOI: 10.1080/02568540209594997.
22.
KamiiCK (1989) Young Children Continue to Reinvent Arithmetic-2nd Grade: Implications of Piaget’s Theory. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
LaveJ (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LaveJ (1996) Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity3: 149–164. DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2.
LeontievAA (1981) The problem of activity in psychology. In: WertschJV (ed.) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 40–71.
27.
LiangKYZegerSL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika73: 13–22. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13.
28.
LiuCHMatthewsR (2005) Vygotsky’s philosophy: constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal6: 386–399. Available at: http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au
29.
Ljung-DjärfAÅberg-BengtssonLOttossonT (2005) Ways of relating to computer use in pre-school activity. International Journal of Early Years Education13: 29–41. DOI: 10.1080/09669760500048295.
30.
LouieLChanL (2003) The use of pedometry to evaluate the physical activity levels among preschool children in Hong Kong. Early Child Development and Care173: 97–107. DOI: 10.1080/0300443022000022459.
31.
MagnussonMPramlingN (2011) Signs of knowledge: the appropriation of a symbolic skill in a 5-year-old. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal19: 357–372. DOI: 10.1080/1350293X.2011.597968.
32.
MaheuxJRothW (2013) Creating learning opportunities for teachers and students: a cultural-historical understanding of classroom research. Curriculum Inquiry43: 233–260. DOI: 10.1111/curi.12009.
33.
NicolopoulouAWeintraubJ (1998) Individual and collective representations in social context: a modest contribution to resuming the interrupted project of a sociocultural developmental psychology. Human Development41: 215–235. DOI: 10.1159/000022583.
34.
NunezI (2009) Activity theory in mathematics education. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics29: 53–57. Available at: http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/informalproceedings.html
35.
NussbaumerD (2012) An overview of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) use in classroom research 2000 to 2009. Educational Review64: 37–55. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2011.553947.
36.
OuelletteGSénéchalM (2008) Pathways to literacy: a study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development79: 899–913. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01166.x.
37.
PiagetJ (1932) The Moral Judgments of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan.
38.
PiagetJ (1951) Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (trans. GattegnoCHodgsonFM). New York, NY: Norton.
39.
PiagetJ (1981) Intelligence and Affectivity: Their Relationship during Child Development (trans. BrownTAKaegiCE). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
40.
PiagetJInhelderB (1969) The Psychology of the Child (trans. WeaverH). New York: Basic Books.
41.
PriorP (2006) A sociocultural theory of writing. In: MacArthurCAGrahamSFitzgeraldJ (eds) Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 54–66.
42.
RazfarAGutiérrezK (2003) Reconceptualizing early childhood literacy: the sociocultural influence. In: HallNLarsonJMarschJ (eds) Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 34–47.
43.
RichgelsDJ (1995) Invented spelling ability and printed word learning in kindergarten. Reading Research Quarterly30: 96–109. DOI: 10.2307/747746.
44.
RogoffB (1998). Cognition and a collaborative process. In: KuhnDSieglerRS (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, Perception and Language. 5th ed. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, pp. 679–744.
45.
RogoffB (2003) The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RussellD (1995) Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In: PetragliaJ (ed.) Reconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 51–77.
48.
SerpellRBakerLSonnenscheinS (2005) Becoming Literate in the City: The Baltimore Early Childhood Project. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
StallerK (2010) Qualitative research. In: SalkindN (ed.) Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 1159–1164.
50.
SugiyamaTOkelyADMastersJM. (2012) Attributes of child care centers and outdoor play areas associated with preschoolers’ physical activity and sedentary behavior. Environment and Behavior44: 334–349. DOI: 10.1177/0013916510393276.
51.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2001) Entering Kindergarten: A Portrait of American Children When They Begin School: Findings from the Condition of Education 2000 (NCES 2001–035). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
52.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (ed ColeMJohn-SteinerVScribnerS.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
WernerHKaplanB (1963). Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought. New York, NY: Wiley.
54.
WolfDPerryMD (1988) From endpoints to repertoires: some new conclusions about drawing development. Journal of Aesthetic Education22: 17–34. DOI: 10.2307/3332961.
55.
ZegerSLLiangKY (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics42: 121–130. DOI: 10.2307/2531248.
