Abstract
After acquisitions, target CEOs are often pushed into a second fiddle role, experiencing a drop in relative standing that contributes to high turnover. These transitions hinge on post-acquisition hierarchies and expectations of deference, making traits linked to dominance consequential. We argue that second fiddle strain arises when trait-based dominance cues clash with these expectations, making the arrangement difficult for both target CEOs and acquiring executives to accept and sustain. Extraverted target CEOs are especially likely to generate such strain because their outgoing and dominant style conflicts with expected restraint. Because acquiring CEOs are central to enacting post-acquisition hierarchies, this strain is shaped by their extraversion. Highly extraverted acquiring CEOs more securely occupy the dominant position and grant greater behavioral latitude, easing constraints on extraverted target CEOs, whereas less extraverted acquiring CEOs rely more on formal authority, tightening these constraints, increasing target CEO turnover. Evidence from US acquisitions supports these arguments.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
