Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Modern organizations face growing institutional and competitive pressures to adopt artificial intelligence for predictive data science and to generate knowledge from vast digital datasets. While artificial intelligence adoption promises new insights, it also engenders hidden capability traps, risking the conflation of reality with algorithmic representations and the neglect of non-digital or analogue dimensions of organizational life. This article introduces the concept of epistemic stance—the underlying approach and orientation to generating knowledge in organizations—to critically examine the organizational implications of predictive data science. It unpacks the components and promises of a data science epistemic stance, highlights its epistemic risks, and explains its appeal to modern organizations. The article argues that organizations can strengthen their knowledge capabilities by combining multiple epistemic stances through carefully designed sociotechnical systems.

Keywords

artificial intelligence big data data science epistemic stance Philosophy of Science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaltonen

Stelmaszak

(2024) The performative production of trace data in knowledge work. Information Systems Research 35(3): 1448–1462.

Agrawal

Gans

Goldfarb

, et al.(eds) (2019) The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Alaimo

Kallinikos

(2024) Data Rules: Reinventing the Market Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anthony

(2018) To question an algorithm: How organizations shape technology’s impact on work. Academy of Management Discoveries 4(1): 1–25.

Anthony

Bechky

Fayard

A-L

(2023) “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organization Science 34(5): 1672–1694.

Argote

(2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.

Arvind

Kim

Cho

, et al. (2021) Development of a machine learning algorithm to predict intubation among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Journal of Critical Care 62: 25–30.

Babic

Chen

Evgeniou

, et al. (2020) A better way to onboard AI. Harvard Business Review, July–August. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/07/a-better-way-to-onboard-ai

Bailey

Faraj

Hinds

, et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence and organization studies: A research agenda. Organization Science 33(1): 1–18.

10.

Bailey

Leonardi

Barley

(2012) The lure of the virtual: Lessons from the transition to simulation-based product design. Organization Science 23(5): 1489–1509.

11.

Bapna

Ghose

(2024) The End of Reality as We Know It: A Guide to AI, Big Data, and Digital Transformation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

12.

Barocas

Hardt

Narayanan

(2024) Fairness and Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

13.

Becker

Hoyer

(2024) The anatomy of clinical decision-making: Aligning AI design with ICU routines. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 13(3): 427–451.

14.

Beer

(2019) The Data Gaze: Capitalism, Power and Perception. London: Sage.

15.

Bhatia

Levina

(2020) Diverse rationalities of entrepreneurship education: An epistemic stance perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education 19(3): 323–344.

16.

Bishop

Hermanson

Marks

, et al. (2019) Unique characteristics of management override fraud cases. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting 11(3): 395–415.

17.

Brandt

Timmermans

(2021) Abductive logic of inquiry for quantitative research in the digital age. Sociological Science 8: 191–210.

18.

Bueno

(2015) Styles of reasoning: A pluralist view. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 48–57.

19.

Chakravartty

(2011) Scientific realism. In: Zalta

(ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

20.

Chakravarty

Lee

Porter

(2025) Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 90: 102973.

21.

Comte

(1858) The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. London: Chapman.

22.

De Vaujany

F-X

(2023) The Rise of Digital Management: From Industrial Mobilization to Platform Capitalism. Abingdon: Routledge.

23.

Desai

Watson

Wang

, et al. (2022) The epistemological foundations of data science: A critical review. Synthese 200: 469.

24.

Dhar

(2013) Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM 56(12): 64–73.

25.

Dougherty

Dunne

(2012) Digital science and knowledge practices. Organization Science 23(5): 1428–1447.

26.

Eubanks

(2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St Martin’s Press.

27.

Faulconbridge

Sarwar

Spring

(2024) Accommodating machine learning algorithms in professional service firms. Organization Studies 45(7): 1009–1037.

28.

Fayard

A-L

Metiu

(2014) The role of writing in distributed collaboration. Organization Science 25(5): 1391–1413.

29.

Fayard

A-L

Gkeredakis

Levina

(2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Information Systems Research 27(2): 302–323.

30.

Fernandez-Loria

Provost

(2022) Causal and predictive analytics in business settings. Information Systems Research 33(1): 1–19.

31.

Ganeri

(2019) Epistemic pluralism: From systems to stances. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5(1): 1–21.

32.

Günsel

Yamen

(2020) Digital Taylorism as an answer to the requirements of the new era. In: Akkaya

(ed.) Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 103–119.

33.

Iansiti

Lakhani

(2020) Competing in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

34.

Jacobsen

(2023) Machine learning and the politics of synthetic data. Big Data & Society 10(1): p20539517221145372.

35.

Jumper

Evans

Pritzel

, et al. (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596: 583–589.

36.

Kallinikos

Aaltonen

Marton

(2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly 37(2): 357–370.

37.

Kellogg

Valentine

Christin

(2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals 14(1): 366–410.

38.

Kilduff

Mehra

Dunn

(2011) From blueprints to communities: Knowledge aggregation in open-source software. Organization Studies 32(1): 47–69.

39.

Kogut

Zander

(1996) What firms do: Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7(5): 502–518.

40.

Lebovitz

Levina

Lifshitz-Assaf

(2021) Is AI ground truth really “true”? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on expert know-what. MIS Quarterly 45(3): 1501–1525.

41.

Lebovitz

Lifshitz-Assaf

Levina

(2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical. Organization Science 33(1): 126–148.

42.

Leonardi

(2025) Homo agenticus in the age of agentic AI: Agency loops, power displacement and the circulation of responsibility. Information and Organization 35(3): 100582.

43.

Leonelli

(2020) Scientific research and big data. In: Zalta

(ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/science-big-data/

44.

Levina

Vaast

(2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for information systems’ implementation and use. MIS Quarterly 29(2): 335–363.

45.

McAfee

Brynjolfsson

(2012) Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review 90(10): 60–66.

46.

Maguire

Dhar

(2013) Comparative effectiveness for oral anti-diabetic treatments among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics: Data-driven predictive analytics in healthcare. Health Systems 2(2): 73–92.

47.

Mayer-Schönberger

Cukier

(2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

48.

Mazmanian

Beckman

(2018) “Making” organization in the digital age: Digital technologies and the logics of organizing. Organization Science 29(2): 315–341.

49.

Newell

Marabelli

(2020) Data science and new patterns of organizing. Information and Organization 30(3): 100337.

50.

Pachidi

Berends

Faraj

, et al. (2014) Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic adoption of data-driven decision-making in clinical practice. Organization Science 25(5): 1402–1424.

51.

Poulidis

Bastani

(2025) Self-regulated AI use hinders long-term learning. SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5604932 (accessed 30 November 2025).

52.

Provost

Fawcett

(2013) Data Science for Business. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

53.

Provost

Ipeirotis

Kaplan

, et al. (2020) Likely-to-sell recommendations for real estate. Medium AI@Compass. Available at: https://medium.com/compass-true-north/likely-to-sell-recommendations-for-real-estate-47e2f5c37f4 (accessed 11 April 2025).

54.

Ravn

(2024) Synthetic training data and the reconfiguration of surveillant assemblages. Surveillance & Society 22(4): 460–465.

55.

Rowbottom

Bueno

(2011) How to use epistemic stances in organizational research. Philosophy of Science 78(3): 374–396.

56.

Shmueli

(2010) To Explain or to Predict? Statistical Science 25(3): 289–310.

57.

Shmueli

(2017) Analyzing behavioral big data: Methodological, practical, ethical and moral issues. Quality Engineering 29(1): 57–74.

58.

Shmueli

Tafti

(2023) How to “improve” prediction using behavior modification. International Journal of Forecasting 39(2): 541–555.

59.

Stevens

Wehrens

de Bont

(2020) Epistemic virtues and data-driven dreams: On sameness and difference in the epistemic cultures of data science and psychiatry. Social Science & Medicine 258: 113–116.

60.

Taylor

(1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.

61.

Terwilliger

Liebschner

Croll

, et al. (2024) AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination. Nature Methods 21(1): 110–116.

62.

Tobin

Laghi

Jubran

(2020) Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 202(3): 356–360.

63.

Tsoukas

(1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal 17: 11–25.

64.

Tsoukas

Sandberg

Fayard

, et al. (2024) Introduction to the special issue on philosophy and organization studies: How does philosophy illuminate the study of organizations? Organization Studies 45(9): 1229–1251.

65.

Van Den Broek

Levina

Sergeeva

(2022) In pursuit of data: Negotiating data tensions between data scientists and users of AI tools. Academy of Management Proceedings 2022(1): 16942.

66.

Van Fraassen

(2002) The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

67.

Zuboff

(2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.

Predictive data science as an epistemic stance: Benefits,risks,and opportunities for knowledge pursuit in organizations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References