Serendipity is often associated with a sudden and extraordinary “eureka” moment. Yet, recent research frames it as a distributed social process. In this article, we extend this nascent research by examining serendipity through a practice lens, conceptualizing it as an effortful social endeavor that unfolds over time. We conducted a 5-year, real-time longitudinal study of a pharmaceutical company engaged in a pre-competitive research consortium. Our analysis reveals that surprising discoveries emerge through four recurring practices, deep-diving, listening in, connecting, and implementing, which bundled together form “serendipity work.” Initially, these practices are related to tasks around planned objectives in the consortium, but over time, they lead to new, unexpected discoveries and reorient toward exploring and shaping the discovery to build strategic value for the company. We contribute to the literature by demystifying serendipity, showing how rather than a spontaneous event, it is actively shaped through mundane practices involving multiple actors.
AndrianiPKaminskaR (2021) Exploring the dynamics of novelty production through exaptation: A historical analysis of coal tar-based innovations. Research Policy50(2): 104171.
2.
BalzanoM (2022) Serendipity in management studies: A literature review and future research directions. Management Decision60(13): 130–152.
3.
BlagoevBHernesTKunischS, et al. (2023) Time as a research lens: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management50(6): 2152–2196.
4.
BuschC (2024) Towards a theory of serendipity: A systematic review and conceptualization. Journal of Management Studies61: 1110–1151.
5.
ChaiS (2017) Near misses in the breakthrough discovery process. Organization Science28(3): 411–428.
6.
CloutierCLangleyA (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution?Organization Theory. Epub ahead of print 13 February. DOI: 10.1177/2631787720902473.
7.
CloutierCRavasiD (2021) Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization19(1): 113–133.
8.
CunhaMPEBertiM (2023) Serendipity in management and organization studies. In: CopelandSRossWSandM (eds) Serendipity Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 49–67.
9.
CunhaMPEChiaR (2007) Using teams to avoid peripheral blindness. Long Range Planning40(6): 559–573.
10.
CunhaMPECleggSRMendonçaS (2010) On serendipity and organizing. European Management Journal28: 319–330.
11.
CunhaMPERegoACleggS, et al. (2015) The dialectics of serendipity. European Management Journal33(1): 9–18.
12.
DarbellayFMoodyZSedookaA, et al. (2014) Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal26(1): 1–10.
13.
DayGSSchoemakerP (2004) Peripheral vision: Sensing and acting on weak signals. Long Range Planning37: 117–121.
14.
De RondM (2014) The structure of serendipity. Culture and Organization20(5): 342–358.
15.
DekenFSeleK (2021) Innovation work and routine dynamics. In: FeldmanMSD’adderioLDittrichK, et al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 288–300.
16.
DenrellJFangCWinterSG (2003) The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal24(10): 977–990.
17.
FeldmanMSOrlikowskiWJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science22(5): 1240–1253.
18.
FergusonA (1999) The lost land of serendip. Forbes164(8): 193–194.
19.
FeulsMHernesTSchultzM (2025) Putting distant futures into action: How actors sustain a course of action toward distant-future goals through path enactment. Academy of Management Journal68(2): 297–325.
20.
Fincher-KieferR (1992) The role of prior knowledge in inferential processing. Journal of Research in Reading15(1): 12–27.
21.
GarudRGehmanJGiulianiAP (2018) Serendipity arrangements for exapting science-based innovations. Academy of Management Perspectives32(1): 125–140.
22.
GeorgeGHoward-GrenvilleJJoshiA, et al. (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal59(6): 1880–1895.
23.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association12(1): 27–49.
24.
HilbollingSDekenFBerendsH, et al. (2021) Process-based temporal coordination in multiparty collaboration for societal challenges. Strategic Organization20(1): 135–163.
25.
KatoKItoSItayaK (2019) Can accidental discoveries be managed? Exploring key factors impacting idea generation in R&D sites in Japan. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management16: 1950042.
26.
KochJVetterP (2025) Serendipity. In: Grossmann-HenselBJarzabkowskiPKratochvilR, et al. (eds) Elgar Encyclopedia of Strategy as Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 237–239.
27.
KornbergerM (2017) The values of strategy: Valuation practices, rivalry and strategic agency. Organization Studies38(12): 1753–1773.
28.
LaneJNGanguliIGauleP, et al. (2021) Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production?Strategic Management Journal42(6): 1215–1244.
29.
LeonardiPM (2015) Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition. MIS Quarterly39(4): 747–762.
30.
LeonardiPMMeyerSR (2015) Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. American Behavioral Scientist59(1): 10–34.
31.
LiuCDe RondM (2016) Good night, and good luck: Perspectives on luck in management scholarship. Academy of Management Annals10(1): 409–451.
32.
McCay-PeetLTomsEG (2015) Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66: 1463–1476.
33.
MakriSBlandfordA (2012) Coming across information serendipitously—Part 2: A classification framework. Journal of Documentation68: 706–724.
34.
MertonRBarberE (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MintzbergHPascaleRTGooldM, et al. (1996) The “Honda effect” revisited. California Management Review38(4): 79–117.
36.
NicoliniD (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
PentlandBTKremserWGohKT (2025) Path nets: Concurrence and recurrence in the dynamics of organizing. Academy of Management Review50(1): 114–137.
38.
PhillipsNLawrenceTB (2012) The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization10(3): 223–230.
39.
RauchMAnsariS (2022) From “publish or perish” to societal impact: Organizational repurposing towards responsible innovation through creating a medical platform. Journal of Management Studies59(1): 61–91.
40.
ReineckeJAnsariS (2017) Time, temporality, and process studies. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 402–416.
41.
RyazanovaOJaskieneJ (2022) Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward. Research Policy51(2): 104448.
42.
SætreASVan de VenAH (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review46(4): 684–701.
43.
SinghJFlemingL (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?Management Science56(1): 41–56.
44.
SmithPBerettaM (2021) The Gordian Knot of practicing digital transformation: Coping with emergent paradoxes in ambidextrous organizing structures. Journal of Product Innovation Management38(1): 166–191.
45.
SvahnFMathiassenLLindgrenR (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo Cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly41(1): 239–254.
YaqubO (2018) Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy47: 169–179.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
