This article distinguishes two types of technology ventures: market anchored and technology anchored. These ventures need to conduct effective technological or market search, the identification and evaluation of alternative technologies or markets, respectively, and form a viable technology–market combination. These types of search are fostered by appropriate experiences of the founding team. A study of 203 new technology ventures shows contrasting effects of breadth and depth of the founding team’s market and technological experiences on the initial success of the venture types.
AhujaGKatilaR (2004) Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal25(8–9): 887–907.
2.
AldrichHEMartinezMA (2001) Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice25(4): 41–56.
3.
AmabileTM (1983) Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(2): 997–1013.
4.
AmbosTCBirkinshawJ (2010) How do new ventures evolve? An inductive study of archetype changes in science-based ventures. Organization Science21(6): 1125–1140.
5.
AndersonBSEshimaY (2013) The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing28(3): 413–429.
6.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14(3): 396–402.
BrushCGChagantiR (1999) Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing14(3): 233–225.
9.
ChatterjiAK (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal30(2): 185–206.
10.
ClarysseBBruneelJWrightM (2011) Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: Structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal5(2): 137–157.
11.
ColomboMGGrilliL (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy34(6): 795–816.
12.
CooperACGimeno-GasconFJWooCY (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing9(5): 371–395.
13.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
DaneE (2010) Reconsidering trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review35(4): 579–603.
15.
DanneelsE (2007) The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal28: 511–533.
DanneelsEFrattiniF (2018) Finding applications for technologies beyond the core business. MIT Sloan Management Review59(3): 73–78.
18.
DavidssonP (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing30(5): 674–695.
19.
DelmarFShaneS (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization4(3): 215–247.
20.
DenckerJCGruberM (2015) The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management Journal36(7): 1035–1052.
DessGGRobinsonRBJr (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal5(3): 265–273.
23.
DimovD (2007) From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person-situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(4): 561–583.
24.
Di StefanoGGamberdellaAVeronaG (2012) Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy41(8): 1283–1295.
25.
EckhardtJTShaneSA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management29(3): 333–349.
26.
EesleyCERobertsEB (2012) Are you experienced or are you talented? When does innate talent versus experience explain entrepreneurial performance?Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal6(3): 207–219.
27.
FernMJCardinalLBO’NeillHM (2012) The genesis of strategy in new ventures: Escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management Journal33(4): 427–447.
28.
FietJO (1996) The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery. Small Business Economics8: 419–430.
29.
FietJO (2007) A prescriptive analysis of search and discovery. Journal of Management Studies44(4): 592–611.
30.
FlemingL (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technology search. Management Science47(1): 117–132.
31.
FlemingLSorensonO (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal25(8–9): 909–928.
32.
FrankeNGruberMHarhoffD, et al. (2008) Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(3): 459–483.
33.
FurrNR (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team preentry experience. Organization Science30(5): 1076–1096.
34.
GarrettRPJNeubaumDO (2013) Top management support and initial strategic assets: A dependency model for internal corporate venture performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management30(5): 896–915.
35.
GavettiGGreveHRLevinthalDA, et al. (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals6: 1–40.
GrégoireDAShepherdDA (2012) Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 753–785.
38.
GrégoireDABarrPSShepherdDA (2010) Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science21(2): 413–431.
39.
GruberM (2007) Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing22(6): 782–807.
40.
GruberM (2010) Exploring the origins of organizational paths: Empirical evidence from newly founded firms. Journal of Management36(5): 1143–1167.
41.
GruberMMacMillanICThompsonJD (2008) Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science54(9): 1652–1665.
42.
GruberMMacMillanICThompsonJD (2012) From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. Journal of Management38(5): 1421–1449.
43.
GruberMMacMillanICThompsonJD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups?Organization Science24(1): 280–300.
44.
HarrisonDAKleinKJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1199–1228.
45.
HeaveyCSimsekZ (2015) Transactive memory systems and firm performance: An upper echelons perspective. Organization Science26(4): 941–959.
46.
HeckmanJJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47(1): 153–162.
47.
HerrmannPNadkarniS (2014) Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal5(9): 1318–1342.
48.
HmieleskiKMBaronRA (2008) Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal2(4): 285–299.
49.
JinLMadisonKKraiczyND, et al. (2017) Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(5): 743–771.
50.
KatilaRAhujaG (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1183–1194.
51.
KnudsenTLevinthalDA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organization Science18(1): 39–54.
52.
LandisJRKochGG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics33: 363–374.
LazarMMiron-SpektorEAgarwalR, et al. (2020) Entrepreneurial team formation. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 29–59.
55.
LevinthalDMarchJG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization2(4): 307–333.
56.
LevinthalDAMarchJG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal14(Suppl. 2): 95–112.
57.
LungeanuRZajacEJ (2019) Thinking broad and deep: Why some directors exert an outsized influence on strategic change. Organization Science30(3): 489–508.
58.
MantereSKetokiviM (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review38(1): 70–89.
59.
NohriaNGulatiR (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation?Academy of Management Journal39(5): 1245–1264.
60.
RichardPJDevinneyTMYipGS, et al. (2009) Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management35(3): 718–804.
61.
RosenkopfLNerkarA (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal22(4): 287–306.
62.
ShaneS (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science11(4): 448–469.
63.
ShaneSStuartT (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science48(1): 154–170.
64.
ShannonCE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal27: 379–423.
65.
SharfmanMPDeanJWJr (1991) Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management17(4): 681–700.
66.
ShepherdDASuddabyR (2017) Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management43(1): 59–86.
67.
ShraderRSiegelDS (2007) Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology–based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(6): 893–908.
68.
SongMDrogeCHanvanichS, et al. (2005) Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal26(3): 259–276.
69.
SouitarisVPengBZerbinatiS, et al. (2023) Specialists, generalists, or both? Founders’ multidimensional breadth of experience and entrepreneurial ventures’ fundraising at IPO. Organization Science34(2): 557–588.
70.
StarbuckWH (1976) Organizations and their environments. In: DunnetteMD (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 1069–1123.
71.
ThompsonJ (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
72.
Van KnippenbergDSchippersMC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology58: 515–541.
73.
Van KnippenbergDDe DreuCKWHomanAC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology89(6): 1008–1022.
74.
Von HippelE (1998) Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Science44(5): 629–644.
75.
WallTDMichieJPattersonM, et al. (2004) On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology57(1): 95–118.
76.
WestGPNoelTA (2009) The impact of knowledge resources on new venture performance. Journal of Small Business Management47(1): 1–22.
77.
WiklundJShepherdD (2003) Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal24(13): 1307–1314.
78.
ZhouKZLiCB (2012) How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal33(9): 1090–1102.
