AnsariSGarudRKumaraswamyA (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal37(9): 1829–1853.
2.
AppleyardMMChesbroughHW (2017) The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning50(3): 310–321.
3.
AstleyWG (1984) Toward an appreciation of collective strategy. Academy of Management Review9(3): 526–535.
4.
BengtssonMKockS (2000) “Coopetition” in business networks—To Cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management29(5): 411–426.
5.
BrandenburgerAMNalebuffBJ (1996) Co-Opetition: A Revolutionary Mindset That Combines Competition and Cooperation in the Marketplace. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6.
BridouxFStoelhorstJW (2022) Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review47(2): 214–236.
7.
CloutierCCoutureF (2023) Comfortably uncomfortable: Unpacking the micro-dynamics of field stability and change. Academy of Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 19 December. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2020.1716.
8.
CoutureFJarzabkowskiPLêJK (2023) Triggers, traps, and disconnect: How governance obstacles hinder progress on grand challenges. Academy of Management Journal66: 1651–1680.
9.
DekenFBerendsHGemserG, et al. (2018) Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Academy of Management Journal61: 1920–1950.
10.
DinckolDOzcanPZachariadisM (2023) Regulatory standards and consequences for industry architecture: The case of UK open banking. Research Policy52(6): 104760.
11.
FombrunCAstleyW (1983) Beyond corporate strategy. Journal of Business Strategy3(4): 47–54.
12.
GarudRKumaraswamyARobertsA, et al. (2022) Liminal movement by digital platform-based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber technologies. Strategic Management Journal43(3): 447–475.
13.
GursesKOzcanP (2015) Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the US. Academy of Management Journal58(6): 1709–1739.
14.
HilbollingSDekenFBerendsH, et al. (2022) Process-based temporal coordination in multiparty collaboration for societal challenges. Strategic Organization20: 135–163.
15.
KhanaghaSAnsariSParoutisS, et al. (2022) Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management Journal43(3): 476–506.
16.
KouaméSHafsiTOliverD, et al. (2022) Creating and sustaining stakeholder emotional resonance with organizational identity in social mission-driven organizations. Academy of Management Journal65(6): 1864–1893.
17.
LaursenKSalterA (2020) Who captures value from open innovation—the firm or its employees?Strategic Management Review1(2): 255–276.
18.
LeiponenAE (2008) Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Science54(11): 1904–1919.
19.
MairJGegenhuberTThäterL, et al. (2023) Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project. Journal of Business Venturing Insights19: e00366.
20.
NambisanSZahraSALuoY (2019) Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories. Journal of International Business Studies50: 1464–1486.
21.
Raza-UllahT (2020) Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension–performance relationship. Long Range Planning53(1): 101863.
22.
YamiSCastaldoSDagninoG, et al. (2010) Coopetition strategies: Toward a new form of inter-organizational dynamics. In: YamiSCastaldoSDagninoGetal. (eds) Coopetition Winning Strategies for the 21st century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–17.
23.
ZuzulTW (2019) “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Academy of Management Journal62: 739–764.
