We argue that firm-specific theories are critical for understanding the emergence and evolution of ecosystems. We first highlight how existing research on ecosystems lacks microfoundations and tends to be overly structural. We focus on the theory-led firm—the role that a firm-specific theory plays in capability development and the associated growth of ecosystems. Ecosystems are contingent on firm-specific theories of value. We also discuss the implications of our arguments for search- and demand-based approaches to ecosystems and point toward a theory-based and supply-side alternative.
AdnerR (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management43(1): 39–58.
2.
AdnerRKapoorR (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal31(3): 306–333.
3.
AhujaGLampertCM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal22(6-7): 521–543.
4.
AnsariSSGarudRKumaraswamyA (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal37(9): 1829–1853.
5.
AutioEThomasLD (2020) Value co-creation in ecosystems: Insights and research promise from three disciplinary perspectives. In: NambisanSLyytinenKYooY (eds) Handbook of Digital Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 107–132.
6.
BennerMJZengerT (2016) The lemons problem in markets for strategy. Strategy Science1(2): 71–89.
CamuffoACordovaAGambardellaA, et al. (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science66(2): 564–586.
9.
CoaseRH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica4(16): 386–405.
10.
CohenA (2003) The Perfect Store: Inside Ebay. New York: Back Bay Books.
11.
DattéeBAlexyOAutioE (2018) Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal61(2): 466–498.
12.
DaymondJKnightERumyantsevaM, et al. (2022) Managing ecosystem emergence and evolution: Strategies for ecosystem architects. Strategic Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 28 July. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3449.
13.
Di StefanoGPeterafMVeronaG (2010) Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change19(4): 1187–1204.
14.
DierickxICoolK (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science35(12): 1504–1511.
15.
DongAGarbuioMLovalloD (2016) Generative sensing: A design perspective on the microfoundations of sensing capabilities. California Management Review58(4): 97–117.
16.
EisenhardtKMMartinJA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal21(10–11): 1105–1121.
17.
ElenkovDS (1997) Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: The case for institutional influences on scanning behavior. Strategic Management Journal18(4): 287–302.
18.
EpsteinJ (2007) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FelinTKoenderinkJ (2022) A generative view of rationality and growing awareness. Frontiers in Psychology13: 807261.
20.
FelinTZengerTR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy43(5): 914–925.
21.
FelinTZengerTR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Science2(4): 258–271.
22.
FelinTZengerTR (2020) Open innovation: A theory-based view. Strategic Management Review1(2): 223–232.
23.
FelinTGambardellaASternS, et al. (2020) Lean startup and the business model: Experimentation revisited. Long Range Planning53(4).
24.
FelinTKauffmanSZengerT (2021) Resource origins and search. Strategic Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 23 October. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3350.
25.
FlemingLSorensonO (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy30(7): 1019–1039.
26.
FossNSchmidtJTeeceD (2022) Ecosystem leadership as a dynamic capability. Long Range Planning56: 102270.
27.
FossNJKleinPG (2012) Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FossNJKleinPGLienLB, et al. (2021) Ownership competence. Strategic Management Journal42(2): 302–328.
29.
GallagherL (2017) The Airbnb Story. New York: Random House.
30.
GancoMKapoorRLeeGK (2020) From rugged landscapes to rugged ecosystems: Structure of interdependencies and firms’ innovative search. Academy of Management Review45(3): 646–674.
31.
GhemawatP (1991) Commitment. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32.
GoshenZHamdaniA (2015) Corporate control and idiosyncratic vision. Yale Law Journal125(3): 560–599.
33.
HelfatCE (2022) Strategic organization, dynamic capabilities, and the external environment. Strategic Organization20: 734–742.
34.
HelfatCERaubitschekRS (2018) Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy47(8): 1391–1399.
35.
HolgerssonMBaldwinCYChesbroughH, et al. (2022) The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review64(3): 5–23.
36.
IansitiMLevienR (2004) The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
37.
JacobidesMGCennamoCGawerA (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal39(8): 2255–2276.
38.
KapoorR (2018) Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design7(1): 1–16.
KarniEVierøML (2013) “Reverse Bayesianism”: A choice-based theory of growing awareness. American Economic Review103(7): 2790–2810.
41.
KauffmanSA (2000) Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
KhanaghaSAnsariSParoutisS (2022) Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management Journal43(3): 476–506.
43.
KingBGFelinTWhettenDA (2010) Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science21(1): 290–305.
44.
LakhaniKRLifshitz-AssafHTushmanML (2013) Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In: GrandoriA (ed.) Handbook of Economic Organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 355–382.
45.
LippmanSARumeltRP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal24(11): 1069–1086.
46.
MakadokR (2001) Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal22(5): 387–401.
47.
MooreJF (1993) Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review71(3): 75–86.
48.
NelsonRRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. London: Belknap Press.
49.
PanicoCCennamoC (2022) User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal43(3): 507–529.
50.
PolanyiM (1974) Genius in science. In: CohenRSWartofskyMW (eds) Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 57–71.
51.
PopperKR (1967) Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
PriemRLWenzelMKochJ (2018) Demand-side strategy and business models: Putting value creation for consumers center stage. Long Range Planning51(1): 22–31.
53.
RichardsonGB (1960) Information and Investment: A Study in the Working of the Competitive Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
RivkinJW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science46(6): 824–844.
55.
ShipilovAGawerA (2020) Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 92–121.
56.
StonigJSchmidTMüller-StewensG (2022) From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition. Strategic Management Journal43(9): 1927–1957.
57.
TeeceDPeterafMLeihS (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review58(4): 13–35.
58.
TeeceDJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy15(6): 285–305.
59.
TeeceDJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal28(13): 1319–1350.
60.
WilliamsonOE (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WuebkerRZengerTFelinT (2021) Entrepreneurial theories and their downstream consequences. SSRN 3917981.
63.
XiaoTMakhijaMKarimS (2022) A knowledge recombination perspective of innovation: Review and new research directions. Journal of Management48(6): 1724–1777.
