Seeking input when the train has left the station: The decoupling of participative strategic decision-making processes and the role of new technology in symbolic management
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2023
Seeking input when the train has left the station: The decoupling of participative strategic decision-making processes and the role of new technology in symbolic management
We examine the symbolic management of participative strategic decision-making programs that purportedly use crowdsourcing technology to solicit strategic input below the executive suite, but are often decoupled from actual strategic decision making. Specifically, top management may decide on a strategic option before soliciting input under the program. The first portion of our theoretical framework explains why disclosure of a participative strategic decision making program in communicating with security analysts is associated with more positive analyst appraisals, despite decoupling, and why the benefits of disclosure are amplified to the extent that leaders highlight the use of crowdsourcing technology in the program. The second portion of our framework addresses the antecedents of symbolic adoption. We suggest that firms are more likely to adopt and decouple a program when the CEO has a personal friendship tie to the CEO of another firm that has adopted and decoupled, especially following relatively negative analyst appraisals. Analysis of a unique dataset that includes longitudinal survey data from executives supported our predictions.
AllisonPD (2010) Survival Analysis Using SAS, 2nd edn.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
2.
AndersonRCMansiSAReebDM (2004) Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics37: 315–342.
3.
BansalPClellandI (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal47: 93–103.
4.
BednarMK (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal55: 131–150.
5.
BennerMJRanganathanR (2013) Divergent reactions to convergent strategies: Investor beliefs and analyst reactions during technological change. Organization Science24: 378–394.
6.
BoonSDHolmesJG (1991) The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In: HindeRAGroebelJ (eds) Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–211.
7.
BrabhamDC (2012) The myth of amateur crowds: A critical discourse analysis of crowdsourcing coverage. Information, Communication & Society15: 394–410.
8.
BrassDJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly29: 518–539.
9.
BrassDJGalaskiewiczJGreveHR, et al. (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal47: 795–817.
10.
BromleyPPowellWW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals6: 483–530.
11.
BrownLDCallACClementMB, et al. (2015) Inside the “black box” of sell-side financial analysts. Journal of Accounting Research53: 1–47.
12.
BusenbarkJRLangeDCertoST (2017) Foreshadowing as impression management: Illuminating the path for security analysts. Strategic Management Journal38: 2486–2507.
13.
CantorNMischelW (1979) Prototypes in person perception. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 12. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–52.
14.
CarlosWCLewisBW (2017) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly63: 130–169.
15.
ChenGCrosslandC (2014) Can you believe it? Managerial discretion and financial analysts’ responses to management earnings forecasts. Advances in Strategic Management31: 103–143.
16.
ChengBIoannouISerafeimG (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal35: 1–23.
17.
ChuaRYJMorrisMWIngramP (2009) Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. Journal of International Business Studies40: 490–508.
18.
ClementMBFrankelRMillerJ (2003) Confirming management earnings forecasts, earnings uncertainty, and stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research41: 653–679.
19.
CrillyDHansenMZolloM (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Academy of Management Journal59: 705–729.
20.
CrosslandCChenG (2013) Executive accountability around the world: Sources of cross-national variation in firm performance-CEO dismissal sensitivity. Strategic Organization11: 78–109.
21.
DavidPDBloomMHillmanAJ (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal28: 91–100.
22.
DavisGF (2005) New directions in corporate governance. Annual Review of Sociology31: 143–162.
23.
DavisGFGreveHR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology103: 1–37.
24.
DavisGFYooMBakerWE (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organization1: 301–326.
25.
DeVellisRF (2017) Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
DiMaggioP (1997) Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology23: 263–287.
27.
DorfmanPWHangesPJBrodbeckFC (2004) Leadership and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles. In: HouseRJHangesPJJavidanM, et al. (eds) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 667–718.
28.
DuruAReebDM (2002) International diversification and analysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. The Accounting Review77: 415–433.
29.
ElsbachKD (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 57–88.
FehrB (2004) Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86: 265–284.
32.
FeldmanMSMarchJG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 171–186.
33.
FissPCZajacEJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal49: 1173–1193.
34.
FleissJLLevinBPaikMC (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
FrankKA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociological Methods & Research29: 147–194.
36.
FriedlandRAlfordRR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–263.
37.
GastAZaniniM (2012) The social side of strategy. Mckinsey Quarterly2: 82–93.
38.
GeletkanyczMAHambrickDC (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 654–681.
GoffmanEE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
41.
GrahamMEBelliveauMAHotchkissJL (2017) The view at the top or signing at the bottom? Workplace diversity responsibility and women’s representation in management. ILR Review70: 223–258.
42.
GraffinSDBoivieSCarpenterMA (2013) Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early-stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management Journal34: 383–403.
43.
GranovetterM (2017) Society and Economy: Framework and Principles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
GriceJWHarrisRJ (1998) A comparison of regression and loading weights for the computation of factor scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research33: 221–247.
45.
GrosserTJLopez-KidwellVLabiancaG (2010) A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management35: 177–212.
46.
GuldikenOMallonMRFainshmidtS, et al. (2019) Beyond tokenism: How strategic leaders influence more meaningful gender diversity on boards of directors. Strategic Management Journal40: 2024–2046.
47.
HaltonM (2016) Lessons from the banking crisis: Leadership and effective board behaviors. In: LeBlancR (ed.) The Handbook of Board Governance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 204–225.
48.
HamelG (2007) The Future of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
49.
HangesPJDorfmanPWShteynbergG, et al. (2006) Culture and leadership: A connectionist information processing model. In: MobleyWHWeldonE (eds) Advances in Global Leadership. New York: JAI Press, pp. 7–37.
50.
HautzJSeidlDWhittingtonR (2017) Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning50: 298–309.
51.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
52.
HaysRB (1985) A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48: 909–924.
53.
HeiderF (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
HoggMATerryDI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25: 121–140.
55.
HollyerJRRosendorffBPVreelandJR (2011) Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics73: 1191–1205.
56.
HornRE (1983) An overview of trialectics within applications to psychology and public policy. In: HornR (ed.) Trialectics: Toward a Practical Logic of Unity. Lexington, MA: Information Resources, pp. 1–39.
57.
HornborgA (2014) Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour, and the cultural foundations of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society31: 119–140.
58.
HouseRJDorfmanPWJavidanM, et al. (2014) Strategic Leadership across Cultures: GLOBE Study of CEO Leadership Behavior and Effectiveness in 24 Countries. London: SAGE.
59.
HouseRJHangesPJJavidanM, et al. (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
HubbardTDChristensenDMGraffinSD (2017) Higher highs and lower lows: The role of corporate social responsibility in CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal38: 2255–2265.
61.
IbarraHAndrewsSB (1993) Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 277–303.
62.
IngramPLifschitzA (2006) Kinship in the shadow of the corporation: The interbuilder network in Clyde River shipbuilding, 1711–1990. American Sociological Review71: 334–352.
63.
JavidanMDorfmanPWde LuqueMS, et al. (2006) In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives20: 67–90.
64.
JosephJOcasioWMcDonnellMH (2014) The structural elaboration of board independence: Executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in U.S. corporate governance. Academy of Management Journal57: 1834–1858.
65.
JungJ (2016) Through the contested terrain: Implementation of downsizing announcements by large U.S. firms, 1984 to 2005. American Sociological Review81: 347–373.
66.
KalytaP (2009) Compensation transparency and managerial opportunism: A study of supplemental retirement plans. Strategic Management Journal30: 405–423.
67.
KrackhardtD (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In: NohriaNEcclesRG (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239.
68.
KrackhardtDKilduffM (1999) Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76: 770–782.
69.
LarckerDFRusticusTO (2010) On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics49: 186–205.
70.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
LiWKrauseRQinX, et al. (2018) Under the microscope: An experimental look at board transparency and director monitoring behavior. Strategic Management Journal39: 1216–1236.
72.
LordRGMaherKJ (2002) Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. New York: Routledge.
73.
LordRGFotiRJPhillipsJS (1982) A theory of leadership categorization. In: HuntJGSekaranUSchriesheimC (eds) Leadership: Beyond Establishment Views. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 104–121.
74.
MacCannellD (1973) Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology79: 589–603.
75.
McDonaldMLWestphalJD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly48: 1–32.
76.
McDonaldMLWestphalJD (2010) A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. Academy of Management Journal53: 343–370.
77.
McDonnellMHKingB (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly58: 387–419.
78.
McEvilyBPerroneVZaheerA (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science14: 91–103.
79.
MantereSVaaraE (2008) On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organization Science19: 341–358.
80.
MarchJGOlsenJP (1984) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review78: 734–749.
81.
MarkóczyLSunSLPengMW, et al. (2013) Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching. Strategic Management Journal34: 1367–1387.
82.
MarquisCToffelMWZhouY (2016.) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science27: 483–504.
83.
MinowN (2016) The rise and (precipitous, vertiginous, disastrous) fall of the fiduciary standard. In: LeBlancR (ed.) The Handbook of Board Governance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 239–248.
84.
MorozovE (2012) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
85.
OliverAGKrauseRBusenbarkJR, et al. (2018) BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal39: 113–130.
86.
PfaffenbergerB (1988) Fetishised objects and humanised nature: Towards an anthropology of technology. Man23: 236–252.
87.
PfaffenbergerB (1992) Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 491–516.
88.
PfefferJ (1981) Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1–52.
89.
PhilippeDDurandR (2011) The impact of norm-conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal32: 969–993.
90.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
91.
ReesLSharpNYTwedtBJ (2015) Who’s heard on the street? Determinants and consequences of financial analyst coverage in the business press. Review of Accounting Studies20: 173–209.
92.
RosenPA (2011) Crowdsourcing lessons for organizations. Journal of Decision Systems20: 309–324.
93.
ScottWR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society37: 427–442.
94.
ShawJB (1990) A cognitive categorization model for the study of intercultural management. The Academy of Management Review15: 626–645.
95.
ShinTYouJ (2017) Pay for talk: How the use of shareholder-value language affects CEO compensation. Journal of Management Studies54: 88–117.
96.
SilverA (1990) Friendship in commercial society: Eighteenth-century social theory and modern sociology. American Journal of Sociology95: 1474–1504.
97.
SobelME (1986) Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology16: 159–186.
98.
StiegerDMatzlerKChatterjeeS, et al. (2012) Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review54: 44–68.
99.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20: 571–610.
100.
SuddabyRGreenwoodR (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 35–67.
101.
SwartHHewstoneMChristO, et al. (2011) Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101: 1221–1238.
102.
TihanyiLJohnsonRAHoskissonRE, et al. (2003) Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal46: 195–211.
103.
TilcsikA (2010) From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal53: 1474–1498.
104.
UseemM (1996) Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America. New York: Basic Books.
105.
UzziB (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review61: 674–698.
106.
WeberKDavisGFLounsburyM (2009) Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980–2005. Academy of Management Journal52: 1319–1347.
107.
WestphalJDGraebnerME (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Academy of Management Journal53: 15–44.
108.
WestphalJDParkSH (2020) Symbolic Management: Governance, Strategy, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109.
WestphalJDZajacEJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly43: 127–153.
110.
WestphalJDZajacEJ (2001) Explaining institutional decoupling: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly46: 202–228.
111.
WestphalJDZajacEJ (2013) A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Academy of Management Annals7: 607–661.
112.
WhittingtonRCailluetLYakis -DouglasB (2011) Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management22: 531–544.
113.
WiersemaMFZhangY (2011) CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management Journal32: 1161–1182.
114.
WinnerL (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
115.
WinnerL (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
116.
XuRFrankKAMaroulisSJ, et al. (2019) Konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences. The STATA Journal19: 523–550.
117.
YuklG (2006) Leadership in Organizations, 6th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
118.
ZhuDWestphalJD (2011) Misperceiving the beliefs of others: How pluralistic ignorance contributes to the persistence of positive security analyst reactions to the adoption of stock repurchase plans. Organization Science22: 869–886.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
