BanerjeeALampelJBhallaA (2019) Two cheers for diversity: An experimental study of micro-level heterogeneity in problemistic search. Strategic Organization17(4): 450–469.
2.
BouquetCBirkinshawJ (2008) Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal51(3): 577–601.
3.
ChenWRMillerKD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal28(4): 369–381.
4.
ChoTSHambrickDC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science17(4): 453–469.
5.
CohenMDMarchJGOlsenJP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly17(1): 1–25.
6.
CrillyDSloanP (2014) Autonomy or control? Organizational architecture and corporate attention to stakeholders. Organization Science25(2): 339–355.
7.
EggersJPKaplanS (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science20(2): 461–477.
8.
EklundJCMannorMJ (2020) Keep your eye on the ball or on the field? Exploring the performance implications of executive strategic attention. Academy of Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 18August. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2019.0156.
9.
GabaVGreveHR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organization Science30(4): 647–667.
10.
HaasMCriscuoloPGeorgeG (2014) Attention allocation and online knowledge sharing within organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings2014(1): 10411.
11.
VuoriTOHuyQN (2016) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1): 9–51.
12.
JosephJGabaV (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 267–302.
13.
JosephJOcasioW (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management Journal33(6): 633–660.
14.
JosephJWilsonAJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention-based view. Strategic Management Journal39(6): 1779–1800.
15.
Laureiro-MartinezD (2014) Cognitive control capabilities, routinization propensity, and decision-making performance. Organization Science25(4): 1111–1133.
16.
Laureiro-MartínezDBrusoniS (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision-making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management Journal39(4): 1031–1058.
17.
Laureiro-MartínezDBrusoniSCanessaN, et al. (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management Journal36(3): 319–338.
18.
MarchJGOlsenJP (1979) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
19.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
20.
MillerKDMartignoniD (2016) Organizational learning with forgetting: Reconsidering the exploration–exploitation tradeoff. Strategic Organization14(1): 53–72.
21.
NadkarniSBarrPS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management Journal19(13): 1395–1427.
22.
NigamAOcasioW (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science21(4): 823–841.
23.
OcasioW (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal18(S1): 187–206.
24.
OcasioW (2011) Attention to attention. Organization Science22(5): 1286–1296.
25.
OcasioWJosephJ (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Advances in Strategic Management22(18): 39–61.
26.
OcasioWRadoynovskaN (2016) Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strategic Organization14(4): 287–309.
27.
OcasioWLaamanenTVaaraE (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention-based view of strategic change. Strategic Management Journal39(1): 155–167.
28.
PiezunkaHDahlanderL (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal58(3): 856–880.
RheeLLeonardiPM (2018) Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management Journal39(4): 1188–1215.
ShepherdDAMcMullenJSOcasioW (2017) Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal38(3): 626–644.
33.
SimonHA (1947) Administrative Behavior; A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press.
34.
SullivanBN (2010) Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organization Science21(2): 432–450.
35.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology105(3): 801–843.
36.
TuggleCSSirmonDGReutzelCR, et al. (2010) Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal31(9): 946–968.
37.
VuoriTOHuyQN (2016) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly61(1): 9–51.
38.
WeickKESutcliffeKM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science17(4): 514–524.
