Past research rooted in the Behavioral Theory of the Firm has extensively examined the impact of performance feedback on organizational change and risk taking, finding robust effects that performance shortfalls enhance the risk taking of firms. We argue that the strength of this effect is likely to be contingent on the attributes of the firm’s top management team. To enhance our understanding of which firms are more likely to be sensitive to performance cues, we draw on the Upper Echelon Theory to theorize that key structural attributes of the top management team—tenure and gender diversity, size, and pay disparity—affect how top executives interpret poor performance and act upon it through engagement in strategic risk taking. Results show that top management teams with greater tenure diversity, smaller size, and smaller pay disparity among members engage in more strategic risk taking following performance shortfalls.
AllisonPD (1978) Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review43: 865–880.
2.
AmasonACSapienzaHJ (1997) The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management23: 495–516.
3.
AnconaDGCaldwellDF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science3: 321–341.
4.
AntleRDemskiJ (1988) The controllability principle in responsibility accounting. The Accounting Review63: 700–716.
5.
AudiaPGGreveHR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science52(1): 83–94.
6.
BarkemaHGShvyrkovO (2007) Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion?Strategic Management Journal28: 663–680.
7.
BascleG (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization6: 285–327.
8.
BattR (2002) Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal45: 587–597.
9.
BaughSGGraenGB (1997) Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group & Organization Management22(3): 366–383.
10.
BaumJACRowleyTJShipilovAV, et al. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly50(4): 536–575.
BezrukovaKJehnKAZanuttoEL, et al. (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science20: 35–50.
13.
BlauPM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
14.
BliesePD (2000) An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Personnel Psychology53(4): 1062–1065.
15.
BloomM (1999) The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal42: 25–40.
16.
BloomMMichelJG (2002) The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion, and managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal45: 33–42.
17.
BromileyP (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk-taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal34(1): 37–59.
18.
BromileyP (2005) The Behavioral Foundations of Strategic Management. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19.
BromileyPHarrisJD (2014) A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal35(3): 338–357.
20.
BuylTBooneCMatthyssensP (2011) Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strategic Organization9: 240–246.
21.
CarpenterMA (2002) The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal23: 275–284.
22.
CarpenterMAFredricksonJW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal44(3): 533–545.
23.
CarpenterMAGeletkanyczMASandersWG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management30: 749–778.
24.
CarpenterMASandersW (2002) Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance?Strategic Management Journal23: 367–375.
25.
CarpenterMASandersWGGregersenHB (2001) Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal44: 493–511.
26.
CertoSTSemadeniM (2006) Strategy research and panel data: Evidence and implications. Journal of Management32(3): 449–471.
ChenWR (2008) Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science19: 609–622.
29.
ChenWRMillerKD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal28: 369–381.
30.
ChinMKHambrickDCTreviñoLK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly58: 197–232.
31.
CohenJCohenPWestSG, et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
CowherdDLevineD (1992) Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 302–320.
33.
CoxTHLobelSAMcLeodPL (1991) Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal34(4): 827–847.
34.
CrosbyF (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review83: 85–113.
35.
CrosslandCZyungJYHillerNJ, et al. (2014) CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal57(3): 652–674.
36.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
DesaiV (2016) The behavioral theory of the (governed) firm: Corporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls. Academy of Management Journal59: 860–879.
38.
DesaiVM (2008) Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations. Organization Science19(4): 594–608.
DeutschM (1969) Conflicts: Productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues25: 7–41.
41.
DeutschM (1985) Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
DeversCEMcNamaraGWisemanRM, et al. (2008) Moving closer to the action: Examining compensation design effects on firm risk. Organization Science19: 548–566.
43.
DowellGWSShackellMBStuartNV (2011) Boards, CEOs, and surviving a financial crisis: Evidence from the internet shakeout. Strategic Management Journal32: 1025–1045.
44.
DyeRA (1984) The trouble with tournaments. Economic Inquiry22: 147–149.
45.
EisenhardtKMBourgeoisLJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal31: 73–770.
46.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7: 117–140.
47.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDC (1990) Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 484–503.
48.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDCCannellaAA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
FredricksonJWDavis-BlakeASandersWG (2010) Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management Journal31: 1031–1053.
50.
GavettiGGreveHRLevinthalDA, et al. (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals6: 1–40.
51.
GavettiGLevinthalDOcasioW (2007) Neo-carnegie: The carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science18(3): 523–536.
52.
GreeneWH (2003) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
GreveHR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal46(6): 685–702.
55.
GreveHR (2003b) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
HaleblianJJMcNamaraGKolevK, et al. (2012) Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers in industry merger waves: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management Journal33(9): 1037–1052.
57.
HambrickDC (1995) Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review37: 110–127.
58.
HambrickDC (2007) Upper echelon theory: An update. Academy of Management Review32: 334–343.
59.
HambrickDCChoTSChenM-J (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 659–684.
60.
HambrickDCHumphreySEGuptaA (2015) Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal36: 449–461.
61.
HambrickDCMasonPA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review9: 193–206.
62.
HanleyJANegassaAEdwardesMD, et al. (2003) Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology157: 364–375.
63.
HarrisJBromileyP (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science18(3): 350–367.
64.
HarrisonDAPriceKHBellMP (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal41: 96–107.
65.
HarrisonDAPriceKHGavinJH, et al. (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal45(5): 1029–1045.
66.
HarrisonEF (1975) The Managerial Decision-Making Process. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
67.
HaynesKTHillmanA (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal31(11): 1145–1163.
68.
HendersonAFredricksonJ (2001) Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioral views. Academy of Management Journal44: 96–117.
69.
HoffmanLRMaierNRF (1961) Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogenous and heterogenous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology58: 27–32.
70.
HoggMATerryDI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25(1): 121–140.
71.
HorwitzSKHorwitzIB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management33: 987–1015.
72.
HutzschenreuterTHorstkotteJ (2013) Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management Journal34: 704–726.
73.
IyerDNMillerKD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal51(4): 808–822.
74.
JacqueminAPBerryCH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate-growth. Journal of Industrial Economics27(4): 359–369.
75.
JehnKA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 530–557.
76.
JosephJKlingebielRWilsonAJ (2016) Organizational structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and termination decisions. Organization Science27: 1065–1083.
77.
KaraevliA (2007) Performance consequences of new CEO “outsiderness”: Moderating effects of pre- and post-succcession contexts. Strategic Management Journal28: 681–706.
78.
KennedyP (2008) A Guide to Econometrics, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
79.
KimJYFinkelsteinSHaleblianJ (2015) All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Academy of Management Journal58(5): 1361–1388.
80.
KnightDPearceCLSmithKG, et al. (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal20: 445–465.
81.
KolevKWisemanRMGomez-MejiaL (2017) Do CEOs ever lose? Fairness perspective on the allocation of residuals between CEOs and shareholders. Journal of Management43: 610–637.
82.
KolevKDMcNamaraG (2020) Board demography and divestitures: The impact of gender and racial diversity on divestiture rate and divestiture returns. Long Range Planning53: 101881.
83.
KorYY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal27: 1081–1099.
84.
KuuselaPKeilTMaulaM (2017) Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change. Strategic Management Journal38(5): 1101–1120.
85.
LambertRLarckerDWeigeltK (1993) The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 438–461.
86.
LiangK-YZegerSL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika73: 13–22.
87.
LimENKMcCannBT (2014) Performance feedback and firm risk taking: The moderating effects of CEO and outside director stock options. Organization Science25(1): 262–282.
88.
MahoneyJT (2005) Economic Foundations of Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
89.
McNamaraGMHaleblianJDykesBJ (2008) The performance implications of participating in an acquisition wave: Early mover advantages, bandwagon effects, and the moderating influence of industry characteristics and acquirer tactics. Academy of Management Journal51(1): 113–130.
90.
MichelJGHambrickDC (1992) Diversification posture and top management characteristics. Academy of Management Journal35: 9–37.
91.
MilgromPRobertsJ (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of Sociology95(suppl): 154–179.
92.
MillerKDBromileyP (1990) Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures. Academy of Management Journal33: 756–779.
93.
MillerKDChenWR (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Academy of Management Journal47(1): 105–115.
94.
MishinaYDykesBJBlockES, et al. (2010) Why “Good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal53(4): 701–722.
95.
MoliternoTPWiersemaMF (2007) Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management Journal28: 1065–1087.
96.
NadolskaABarkemaHG (2014) Good learners: How top management teams affect the success and frequency of acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal35: 1483–1507.
97.
Naranjo-GilDHartmannFMaasVS (2008) Top management team heterogeneity, strategic change and operational performance. British Journal of Management19: 222–234.
98.
O’ReillyCCaldwellDBarnettW (1989) Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly34: 21–37.
99.
O’ReillyCASnyderRCBootheJN (1993) Executive team demography and organizational change. In: HuberGPGlickWH (eds) Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–175.
100.
PalmerTBWisemanRM (1999) Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal20: 1037–1062.
101.
PelledLH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science7(6): 615–631.
102.
PelledLHEisenhardtKMXinKR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly44(1): 1–28.
103.
QuigleyTJHambrickDC (2012) When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal33(7): 834–859.
104.
RefOShapiraZB (2017) Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it. Strategic Management Journal38(7): 1416–1434.
105.
RidgeJWAimeFWhiteMA (2013) When much more of a difference makes a difference: Social comparison and tournaments in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management Journal36: 618–636.
106.
RidgeJWHillADAimeF (2014) Implications of multiple concurrent pay comparisons for top-team turnover. Journal of Management43: 671–690.
107.
SandersWGCarpenterMA (1998) Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal41: 158–178.
108.
SandersWGHambrickDC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal50: 1055–1078.
109.
SchimmerMBrauerM (2012) Firm performance and aspiration levels as determinants of a firm’s strategic repositioning within strategic group structures. Strategic Organization10: 406–435.
110.
SemadeniMWithersMCTrevis CertoS (2014) The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal35: 1070–1079.
111.
ShawME (1976) Group Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
112.
ShawME (1981) Group Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
113.
ShipilovAVLiSXGreveHR (2011) The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organization Science22: 1418–1434.
114.
SiegelPAHambrickDC (2005) Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science16: 259–274.
115.
SimsekZVeigaJFLubatkinMH, et al. (2005) Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal48: 69–84.
116.
SmithKGSmithKAOlianJD, et al. (1994) Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 412–438.
117.
ThornburgTH (1991) Group size and member diversity influence on creative performance. Journal of Creative Behavior25: 324–333.
118.
TihanyiLEllstrandAEDailyCM, et al. (2000) Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management26: 1157–1177.
119.
TrianaMCMillerTLTrzebiatowskiTM (2013) The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science25: 609–632.
120.
TsuiASEganTDO’ReillyCA (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 549–565.
121.
TushmanMLRosenkopfL (1996) Executive succession, strategic reorientation, and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. Cement industry. Management Science42: 939–953.
122.
VeigaJF (1991) The frequency of self-limiting behavior in groups: A measure and an explanation. Human Relations44: 877–896.
123.
VissaBGreveHRChenWR (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organization Science21(3): 696–712.
124.
WagnerWGPfefferJO’ReillyCA (1984) Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly29: 74–92.
125.
WangrowDBKolevKHughes-MorganM (2019) Not all responses are the same: How CEO cognitions impact strategy when performance falls below aspirations. Journal of General Management44: 73–86.
126.
WangrowDBSchepkerDJBarkerVL (2014) Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research. Journal of Management14: 99–135.
127.
WhyteWF (1955) Money and Motivation: An Analysis of Incentives in Industry. New York: Harper.
128.
WiersemaMFBantelKA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal35: 91–121.
129.
WiklundJShepherdD (2003) Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies40(8): 1919–1941.
130.
WilliamsKYO’ReillyCA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 77–140.
131.
WowakAJMannorMJArrfeltM, et al. (2016) Earthquake or glacier? How CEO charisma manifests in firm strategy over time. Strategic Management Journal37: 586–603.
132.
ZengerTRLawrenceBS (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distribution on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal32: 353–376.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
