The existing literature has reached contradictory empirical conclusions regarding the tendency for generalist and specialist organizations to change their status quo. Some have posited that generalists are less likely to change than specialists, while others have posited the opposite. This article explores when generalists and specialists change their allocations of labor resources by delving into two different mechanisms: (1) how they perform (problem-driven mechanism) and (2) how much extra resources they possess (slack-driven mechanism). Based on empirical evidence collected in the agricultural industry in South Korea, we find that specialists are more likely to change in accordance with a problem-driven mechanism, whereas generalists are more prone to react to a slack-driven mechanism.
AhujaGNovelliE (2017) Redirecting research efforts on the diversification–performance linkage: The search for synergy. Academy of Management Annals11(1): 342–390.
2.
AntonelliC (1989) A failure-inducement model of research and development expenditure: Italian evidence from the early 1980s. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization12(2): 159–180.
3.
ArgoteL (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. New York: Springer.
4.
ArgoteLGreveHR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm: Forty years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science18(3): 337–349.
5.
BarnettWPSorensonO (2002) The red queen in organizational creation and development. Industrial and Corporate Change11(2): 289–325.
6.
BarnettWPGreveHRParkDY (1994) An evolutionary model of organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal15(S1): 11–28.
7.
BarrosoAGiarratanaMS (2013) Product proliferation strategies and firm performance: The moderating role of product space complexity. Strategic Management Journal34(12): 1435–1452.
8.
BaumJACRowleyTJShipilovAV, et al. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly50(4): 536–575.
9.
BeckerMCLazaricNNelsonRR, et al. (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change14(5): 775–791.
10.
Ben-OzCGreveHR (2015) Short- and long-term performance feedback and absorptive capacity. Journal of Management41(7): 1827–1853.
11.
BerryCH (1971) Corporate growth and diversification. The Journal of Law and Economics14(2): 371–383.
12.
BourgeoisLJ (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review6(1): 29–39.
13.
BradleySWAldrichHShepherdDA, et al. (2011) Resources, environmental change, and survival: Asymmetric paths of young independent and subsidiary organizations. Strategic Management Journal32(5): 486–509.
14.
BromileyP (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal34(1): 37–59.
15.
CattaniGFerrianiS (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science19(6): 824–844.
16.
ChenW-RMillerKD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal28(4): 369–381.
17.
CohenWMLevinthalDA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
18.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
D’AveniRAMacMillanIC (1990) Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly35(4): 634–657.
20.
DelacroixJSwaminathanA (1991) Cosmetic, speculative, and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly36(4): 631–661.
21.
DesaiV (2016) Learning to learn from failures: The impact of operating experience on railroad accident responses. Industrial and Corporate Change25(2): 199–226.
22.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
23.
DobrevSDKimT-Y (2019) Bringing the firms (and forms) back in: Organizational form identity and individual turnover. Academy of Management Journal62(4): 1028–1051.
24.
DobrevSDKimT-YCarrollGR (2002) The evolution of organizational niches: U.S. automobile manufacturers, 1885-1981. Administrative Science Quarterly47(2): 233–264.
25.
DobrevSDKimT-YCarrollGR (2003) Shifting gears, shifting niches: Organizational inertia and change in the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry, 1885–1981. Organization Science14(3): 264–282.
26.
EggersJP (2012) Falling flat: Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly57(1): 47–80.
27.
EggersJPKaulA (2018) Motivation and ability?A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Academy of Management Journal61(1): 67–93.
28.
FeldmanMSPentlandBT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly48(1): 94–118.
29.
FosfuriAGiarratanaMSSebrekSS (2018) Resource partitioning and strategies in markets for technology. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 15 June. DOI: 10.1177/1476127018791329.
30.
FreemanJHannanMT (1983) Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Journal of Sociology88(6): 1116–1145.
31.
GabaVJosephJ (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in m-form firms. Organization Science24(4): 1102–1119.
32.
GeorgeG (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal48(4): 661–676.
33.
GilbertCG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist?Organization Science17(1): 150–167.
GreveHR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal46(6): 685–702.
37.
HahnUChaterNRichardsonLB (2003) Similarity as transformation. Cognition87(1): 1–32.
38.
HannanMTFreemanJ (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology82(5): 929–964.
39.
HaunschildPRRheeM (2004) The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Science50(11): 1545–1560.
40.
HaunschildPRSullivanBN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Administrative Science Quarterly47(4): 609–643.
41.
HavemanHA (1993) Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Administrative Science Quarterly38(1): 20–50.
HsuGHannanMT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organization Science16(5): 474–490.
44.
IngramPBaumJAC (1997) Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management Journal18(S1): 75–98.
45.
JensenMKimBK (2014) Great, Madama Butterfly again! How robust market identity shapes opera repertoires. Organization Science25(1): 109–126.
46.
JosephJGabaV (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management Journal36(13): 1960–1978.
47.
JourdanJKivlenieceI (2017) Too much of a good thing? The dual effect of public sponsorship on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal60(1): 55–77.
48.
KimTRheeM (2017) Structural and behavioral antecedents of change: Status, distinctiveness, and relative performance. Journal of Management43(3): 716–741.
49.
KirmanATeschlM (2006) Searching for identity in the capability space. Journal of Economic Methodology13(3): 299–325.
50.
KlingebielR (2018) Risk-type preference shifts in response to performance feedback. Strategic Organization16(2): 141–166.
51.
Korea Rural Economic Institute (2019) The position of Korean agriculture in the world. Report no. M160. South Jeolla, South Korea: Korea Rural Economic Institute.
52.
LabiancaGFairbankJFAndrevskiG, et al. (2009) Striving toward the future: Aspiration—Performance discrepancies and planned organizational change. Strategic Organization7(4): 433–466.
LantTKMontgomeryDB (1987) Learning from strategic success and failure. Journal of Business Research15(6): 503–517.
55.
LeeBHHiattSRLounsburyM (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science28(3): 447–470.
56.
LevinthalDMarchJG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization2(4): 307–333.
57.
LevittBMarchJG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology14(1): 319–338.
58.
LiangK-YZegerSL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika73(1): 13–22.
59.
LiuMWezelFC (2014) Davids against goliath? Collective identities and the market success of peripheral organizations during resource partitioning. Organization Science26(1): 293–309.
60.
McKendrickDGHannanMT (2014) Oppositional identities and resource partitioning: Distillery ownership in scotch whisky, 1826–2009. Organization Science25(4): 1272–1286.
61.
MarchJG (1988) Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization9(1): 5–24.
62.
MarchJGShapiraZ (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science33(11): 1404–1418.
63.
MarchJGShapiraZ (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review99(1): 172–183.
64.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
65.
MathiasBDHuygheAFridCJ, et al. (2018) An identity perspective on coopetition in the craft beer industry. Strategic Management Journal39(12): 3086–3115.
66.
MillerD (1990) The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring about Their Own Downfall: New Lessons in the Dynamics of Corporate Success, Decline, and Renewal. New York: Harper Business.
67.
Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (2019) Rice income compensation payment program. Available at: http://www.mafra.go.kr/mafra/1351/subview.do(accessed 1 February 2019).
68.
MishinaYDykesBJBlockES, et al. (2010) Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal53(4): 701–722.
69.
MoliternoTPWiersemaMF (2007) Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management Journal28(11): 1065–1087.
70.
MonteiroGFAZylbersztajnD (2012) A property rights approach to strategy. Strategic Organization10(4): 366–383.
71.
NegroGHannanMTFassiottoM (2014) Category signaling and reputation. Organization Science26(2): 584–600.
72.
NelsonRRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
73.
NohriaNGulatiR (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation?Academy of Management Journal39(5): 1245–1264.
74.
Pernell-GallagherK (2015) Learning from performance: Banks, collateralized debt obligations, and the credit crisis. Social Forces94(1): 31–59.
75.
PettigrewAM (1987) Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies24(6): 649–670.
76.
PontikesEGBarnettWP (2017) The coevolution of organizational knowledge and market technology. Strategy Science2(1): 64–82.
77.
PosenHEKeilTKimS, et al. (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search —A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals12(1): 208–251.
78.
ReineckeJAnsariS (2015) What is a “fair” price? Ethics as sensemaking. Organization Science26(3): 867–888.
79.
SchimmerMBrauerM (2012) Firm performance and aspiration levels as determinants of a firm’s strategic repositioning within strategic group structures. Strategic Organization10(4): 406–435.
80.
SharfmanMPWolfGChaseRB, et al. (1988) Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review13(4): 601–614.
81.
ShipilovAV (2006) Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Academy of Management Journal49(3): 590–604.
82.
SinghJV (1986) Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal29(3): 562–585.
83.
SorensonO (2000) Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management Journal21(5): 577–592.
84.
SorensonO (2003) Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long–term effect of integration. Management Science49(4): 446–463.
85.
SorensonOMcEvilySRenCR, et al. (2006) Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance. Strategic Management Journal27(10): 915–936.
86.
SpradleyJP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. Orlando, FL: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
87.
Statistics Korea (2014) Food grain consumption survey report. Report no. 11-1240000-000069-10. Daejeon, South Korea: Statistics Korea.
88.
StrangDSouleSA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology24: 265–290.
89.
SwaminathanA (2001) Resource partitioning and the evolution of specialist organizations: The role of location and identity in the U.S. wine industry. Academy of Management Journal44(6): 1169–1185.
90.
TushmanMLO’ReillyCA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review38(4): 8–29.
91.
VerhaalJCHoskinsJDLundmarkLW (2017) Little fish in a big pond: Legitimacy transfer, authenticity, and factors of peripheral firm entry and growth in the market center. Strategic Management Journal38(12): 2532–2552.
92.
VissaBGreveHRChenW-R (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organization Science21(3): 696–712.
93.
VossGBSirdeshmukhDVossZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal51(1): 147–164.
94.
WeberKHeinzeKLDeSouceyM (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly53(3): 529–567.
95.
WehrungDA (1989) Risk taking over gains and losses: A study of oil executives. Annals of Operations Research19(1): 115–139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
