When does it pay to stand out as stand-up? Competitive contingencies in the corporate social performance–corporate financial performance relationship

Abstract

We develop a competitive contingency model of the relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance, focusing on the moderating effects of industry-based factors. We conceptualize corporate social performance as a form of strategic differentiation and predict that the positive link between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance is strongest when a firm competes in an environment that is not conducive to corporate social performance. Analyses of data from roughly 2500 publicly traded firms between 2002 and 2009 support the moderating effects of industry munificence and social orientation. We discuss the implications of our contingency model for firms seeking a competitive advantage through corporate social performance.

Keywords

competitive advantage corporate social performance environmental contingencies stakeholders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

(1979) On the interchangeability of size measures. Academy of Management Journal 22(2): 404–409.

Agle

Mitchell

Sonnenfeld

(1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 507–525.

Aguinis

Glavas

(2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38(4): 932–968.

Aldrich

(1979) Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Aragón-Correa

Sharma

(2003) A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28(1): 71–88.

Aupperle

Carroll

Hatfield

(1985) An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of management Journal 28(2): 446–463.

Ballinger

(2004) Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods 7(2): 127–150.

Bansal

(2005) Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26(3): 197–218.

Barnett

(2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32(3): 794–816.

10.

Barnett

Salomon

(2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 33(11): 1304–1320.

11.

Barney

(1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.

12.

Baum

Singh

(1994) Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. American Journal of Sociology 100(2): 346–380.

13.

Boutin-Dufresne

Savaria

(2004) Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. The Journal of Investing 13(1): 57–66.

14.

Boyd

(1995) CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal 16(4): 301–312.

15.

Brammer

Millington

(2008) Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29(12): 1325–1343.

16.

Brush

Artz

(1999) Toward a contingent resource-based theory: The impact of information asymmetry on the value of capabilities in veterinary medicine. Strategic Management Journal 20(3): 223–250.

17.

Burgelman

(1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science 2: 239–262.

18.

Calof

(1994) The relationship between firm size and export behavior revisited. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 367–387.

19.

Carroll

(1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34(4): 39–48.

20.

Castrogiovanni

(1991) Environmental munificence: A theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review 16(3): 542–565.

21.

Castrogiovanni

(2002) Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? Journal of Management 28(2): 129–150.

22.

Cavaco

Crifo

(2014) CSR and financial performance: complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Applied Economics 46(27): 3323–3338.

23.

Certo

Semadeni

(2006) Strategy research and panel data: Evidence and implications. Journal of Management 32(3): 449–471.

24.

Chatterji

Levine

Toffel

(2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18(1): 125–169.

25.

Chen

Zeng

Lin

, et al. (2017) Munificence, dynamism, and complexity: How industry context drives corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(2): 125–141.

26.

Child

(1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1): 1–22.

27.

Chin

Hambrick

Trevino

(2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly 58(2): 197–232.

28.

Clarkson

MBE

(1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92–117.

29.

Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2001) Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. COM(2001) 366 final, 18 July. Brussels: CEC.

30.

Coombs

Gilley

(2005) Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(9): 827–840.

31.

Cottrill

(1990) Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics 9(9): 723–729.

32.

Covin

Slevin

(1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal 10(1): 75–87.

33.

Cyert

March

(1963) A Behaviorial Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

34.

David

Bloom

Hillman

(2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(1): 91–100.

35.

Deckop

Merriman

Gupta

(2006) The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management 32(3): 329–342.

36.

Deephouse

(1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal 20(2): 147–166.

37.

Dess

Beard

(1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 29(1): 52–73.

38.

Donaldson

Preston

(1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.

39.

Drazin

Van de Ven

(1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 30(4): 514–539.

40.

Bhattacharya

Sen

(2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1): 8–19.

41.

Eisenhardt

(1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32(3): 543–576.

42.

Forbes (2007) The most charitable industries. Forbes, 16 January. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/2007/01/16/leadership-philanthropy-charity-lead-citizen-cx_hc_0116charitable.html

43.

Galaskiewicz

(1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 445–471.

44.

Galbraith

(1973) Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

45.

Garg

Walters

Priem

(2003) Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 24(8): 725–744.

46.

Goll

Rasheed

(2004) The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49(1): 41–54.

47.

Graves

Waddock

(1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 37(4): 1034–1046.

48.

Grossack

(1965) Towards an integration of static and dynamic measures of industry concentration. The Review of Economics and Statistics 47(3): 301–308.

49.

Harrison

Freeman

(1999) Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 479–485.

50.

Hart

Sharfman

(2015) Assessing the concurrent validity of the revised Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini corporate social performance indicators. Business & Society 54(5): 575–598.

51.

Henderson

Miller

Hambrick

(2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal 27(5): 447–460.

52.

Hillman

Keim

(2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 125–139.

53.

Homburg

Workman

Krohmer

(1999) Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing 63(2): 1–17.

54.

Hough

White

(2004) Scanning actions and environmental dynamism: Gathering information for strategic decision making. Management Decision 42(6): 781–793.

55.

Hull

Rothenberg

(2008) Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal 29(7): 781–789.

56.

Jayachandran

Kalaignanam

Eilert

(2013) Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 34(10): 1255–1264.

57.

Jones

(1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20(2): 404–437.

58.

Keats

Hitt

(1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(3): 570–598.

59.

Kobrin

(1991) An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal 12(S1): 17–31.

60.

Koh

P-S

Qian

Wang

(2014) Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal 35(10): 1464–1482.

61.

Lawrence

Lorsch

(1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12(1): 1–47.

62.

Liang

Zeger

(1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22.

63.

Loughran

Ritter

(2004) Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management 33: 5–37.

64.

Luo

Bhattacharya

(2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70(4): 1–18.

65.

Mackey

Barney

(2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review 32(3): 817–835.

66.

McWilliams

Siegel

(2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): 603–609.

67.

Marcus

Goodman

(1991) Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal 34(2): 281–305.

68.

Margolis

Elfenbein

Walsh

(2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Unpublished working paper, 1 November. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

69.

Mielach

(2011) Method founders make cleaning cool. Business News Daily, 2 October. Available at: https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/1523-method-cleaning-products-founders.html

70.

Miller

Friesen

(1983) Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal 4(3): 221–235.

71.

Mintzberg

Raisinghani

Theoret

(1976) Structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(2): 246–275.

72.

Nason

Bacq

Gras

(2018) A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review 43(2): 259–283.

73.

Ogden

Watson

(1999) Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 526–538.

74.

Orlitzky

(2001) Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33(2): 167–180.

75.

Orlitzky

Schmidt

Rynes

(2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403–441.

76.

Peress

(2008) Media coverage and investors’ attention to earnings announcements. Working paper, 15 December. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2723916

77.

Prakash

(2000) Responsible care: An assessment. Business & Society 39(2): 183–209.

78.

Pfeffer

Salancik

(1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

79.

Porter

(1996) What is strategy? Harvard Business Review 74(6): 61–78.

80.

Petrenko

Aime

Ridge

Hill

(2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal 37(2): 262–279.

81.

Priem

Butler

(2013) Toward reimagining strategy research: Retrospection and prospection on the 2011 AMR decade award article. Academy of Management Review 38(4): 471–489.

82.

Qian

(2003) Profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 24(9): 881–887.

83.

Roberts

Dowling

(2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(12): 1077–1093.

84.

Rowley

Berman

(2000) A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society 39(4): 397–418.

85.

Russo

Fouts

(1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 534–559.

86.

Scott

(1995) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

87.

Sharma

Vredenburg

(1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8): 729–753.

88.

Siegel

Vitaliano

(2007) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(3): 773–792.

89.

Staw

Szwajkowski

(1975) The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Administrative Science Quarterly 20(3): 345–354.

90.

Sweeney

Coughlan

(2008) Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications 14(2): 113–124.

91.

Tantalo

Priem

(2016) Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal 37: 314–329.

92.

Tosi

Slocum

(1984) Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. Journal of Management 10(1): 9–26.

93.

Turban

Greening

(1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 658–672.

94.

Uotila

Maula

Keil

, et al. (2009) Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal 30(2): 221–231.

95.

Van Beurden

Gössling

(2008) The worth of values—A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 82(2): 407–424.

96.

Waddock

Graves

(1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303–319.

97.

Walters

Kroll

Wright

(2010) The impact of TMT board member control and environment on post-ipo performance. Academy of Management Journal 53(3): 572–595.

98.

Wang

Choi

(2013) A new look at the corporate social-financial performance relationship: The moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 39(2): 416–441.

99.

Wang

Choi

(2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science 19(1): 143–159.

100.

Wang

Dou

Jia

(2016) A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society 55(8): 1083–1121.

101.

Wiersema

Bantel

(1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal 14(7): 485–504.

102.

Winn

MacDonald

Zietsma

(2008) Managing industry reputation: The dynamic tension between collective and competitive reputation management strategies. Corporate Reputation Review 11(1): 35–55.

103.

Wong

Ormiston

Tetlock

(2011) The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 54(6): 1207–1228.

104.

Wood

(1991) Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 17(2): 383–406.

105.

Wood

Jones

(1995) Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3): 229–267.

106.

Wowak

Hambrick

Henderson

(2011) Do CEOs encounter within-tenure settling up? A multiperiod perspective on executive pay and dismissal. Academy of Management Journal 54(4): 719–739.