The rate at which experimental studies are published in the field of strategy has steadily increased over the past few years. Still, experimental papers account for only a small fraction of strategy papers. This may not come as a surprise given the skepticism surrounding the experimental method, which is often seen as uninterested in establishing external validity, and too “micro” for a field in which the level of analysis is primarily organizational and inter-organizational. Is this skepticism founded? To what extent can experiments be a useful tool for strategy research? To answer this question, we start by examining experimental strategy papers published between 1980 and 2016. Results from the analysis alleviate doubts about the suitability of experimental methods for the study of questions of strategic interest to firms. We next discuss the main advantages associated with the use of experiments and why they make strategy an exciting field in which to be an experimentalist today.
AgarwalRAnandJBercovitzJ, et al. (2012) Spillovers across organizational architectures: The role of prior resource allocation and communication in post-acquisition coordination outcomes. Strategic Management Journal33(6): 710–733.
AngristJDPischkeJS (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives24(2): 3–30.
4.
BaldassarriDAbascalM (2017) Field experiments across the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology43(1): 41–73.
5.
BanerjeeAVDufloE (2011) Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.
6.
BardoletDFoxCLovalloD (2011) Corporate capital allocation: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management Journal32(13): 1465–1483.
7.
BascleG (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization6(3): 285–327.
8.
BergJM (2016) Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly61(3): 433–468.
9.
BillingerSStieglitzNSchumacherTR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organization Science25(1): 93–108.
10.
BitektineALucasJSchilkeO (2018) Institutions under a microscope: Experimental methods in institutional theory. In: BrymanABuchananDA (eds) Unconventional Methodology in Organization and Management Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–167.
11.
BottomWPHollowayJMillerGJ, et al. (2006) Building a pathway to cooperation: Negotiation and social exchange between principal and agent. Administrative Science Quarterly51(1): 29–58.
12.
BoudreauKJLakhaniKR (2015) Innovation experiments: Researching technical advance, knowledge production and the design of supporting institutions. In: LernerJSternS (eds) Innovation Policy and the Economy: NBER, vol. 16. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 135–167.
13.
BrutusSAguinisHWassmerU (2013) Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Management39(1): 48–75.
14.
BurbanoV (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organization Science27(4): 1010–1028.
15.
CarpenterJHarrisonGListJA, et al. (2005) Field Experiments in Economics, vol. 10. Greenwich; London: JAI Press.
16.
CataliniCTuckerC (2017) When early adopters don’t adopt. Science357(6347): 135–136.
CoffRKryscynskiD (2011) Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management37: 1429–1443.
19.
ConlonEParksJ (1990) Effects of monitoring and tradition on compensation arrangements: An experiment with principal-agent dyads. Academy of Management Journal33(3): 603–622.
20.
CookTDCampbellDT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
21.
CronbachLJMeehlPE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin52(4): 281–302.
22.
CrosonRAnandJAgarwalR (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. European Management Review4: 173–181.
23.
Di StefanoGKingAAVeronaG (2015) Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Academy of Management Journal58(3): 906–931.
24.
DuffyJ (2014) Macroeconomics in the laboratory. In: DuffyJ (ed.) Experiments in Macroeconomics (Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 17). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 1–10.
25.
EthirajSKGambardellaAHelfatCE (2016) Replication in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal37(11): 2191–2192.
26.
FalkAHeckmanJJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science326(5952): 535–538.
27.
FelinTFossNJHeimeriksKH, et al. (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies49(8): 1351–1374.
28.
FlammerC (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal36(10): 1469–1485.
29.
FloydEListJA (2016) Using field experiments in accounting and finance. Journal of Accounting Research54(2): 437–475.
30.
FossNJPedersenT (2016) Microfoundations in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal37(13): E22–E34.
31.
GeyskensISteenkampJBEKumarN (2006) Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal49(3): 519–543.
GublerTLarkinIPierceL (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organization Science27(2): 286–303.
34.
GutierrezCÅstebroTOblojT (2018) The impact of overconfidence and ambiguity attitude on market entry (Working paper). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2924381
35.
HamiltonBHNickersonJA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization1(1): 51–78.
36.
HenrichJHeineSJNorenzayanA (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences33(2–3): 61–83.
37.
HodgkinsonGPHealeyMP (2011) Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal32(13): 1500–1516.
38.
HodgkinsonGPBownNJMauleAJ, et al. (1999) Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal20(10): 977–985.
39.
HuangLPearceJL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly60(4): 634–670.
40.
JordanPC (1986) Effects of an extrinsic reward on intrinsic motivation: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal29(2): 405–412.
41.
KistruckGMSutterCJLountRBJr, et al. (2013) Mitigating principal-agent problems in base-of-the-pyramid markets: An identity spillover perspective. Academy of Management Journal56(3): 659–682.
42.
KuncMHMorecroftJDW (2010) Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm. Strategic Management Journal31(11): 1164–1182.
43.
LaLondeRJ (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. The American Economic Review76: 604–620.
44.
Laureiro-MartinezDBrusoniSCanessaN, et al. (2014) Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management Journal36(3): 319–338.
45.
LeeSPuranamP (2017) Incentive redesign and collaboration in organizations: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management Journal38(12): 2333–2352.
46.
LevineSSBernardMNagelR (2017) Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management Journal38: 2390–2423.
47.
LochCHSenguptaKAhmadMG (2013) The microevolution of routines: How problem solving and social preferences interact. Organization Science24(1): 99–115.
48.
MitchellRJShepherdDASharfmanMP (2011) Erratic strategic decisions: When and why managers are inconsistent in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal32(7): 683–704.
49.
MontmarquetteCRulliereJLVillevalM, et al. (2004) Redesigning teams and incentives in a merger: An experiment with managers and students. Management Science50(10): 1379–1389.
50.
MooreDAOeschJMZietsmaC (2007) What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organization Science18(3): 440–454.
51.
NagarajA (2018) Does copyright affect reuse? Evidence from Google Books and Wikipedia. Management Science64(7): 3091–3107.
52.
OblojTZengerT (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organization Science28(1): 1–18.
53.
OxleyJERivkinJWRyallMD, et al. (2010) The strategy research initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy. Strategic Organization8(4): 377–386.
RaveendranMPuranamPWarglienM (2016) Object salience in the division of labor: Experimental evidence. Management Science62(7): 2110–2128.
56.
ReitzigMMaciejovskyB (2015) Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—A behavioral view. Strategic Management Journal36(13): 1979–1999.
57.
ScanduraTAWilliamsEA (2000) Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1248–1264.
58.
SchwenkCR (1982) Why sacrifice rigour for relevance? A proposal for combining laboratory and field research in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal3(3): 213–225.
59.
ShadishWRCookTDCampbellDT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
60.
ShaverJM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival?Management Science44(4): 571–585.
61.
StajkovicADLuthansF (2001) Differential effects of incentive motivators on work performance. Academy of Management Journal44(3): 580–590.
62.
StarrEBalasubramanianNSakakibaraM (2018) Screening spinouts? How noncompete enforceability affects the creation, growth, and survival of new firms. Management Science64(2): 552–572.
63.
SutcliffeKMZaheerA (1998) Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal19: 1–23.
64.
TosiHLKatzJPGomez-MejiaLR (1997) Disaggregating the agency contract: The effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Academy of Management Journal40(3): 584–602.
65.
WeberRACamererCF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Science49(4): 400–415.
66.
WelshDHBLuthansFSommerSM (1993) Managing Russian factory workers: The impact of U.S.-based behavioral and participative techniques. Academy of Management Journal36(1): 58–79.
67.
ZhangL (2018) Intellectual property strategy and the long tail: Evidence from the recorded music industry. Management Science64(1): 24–42.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
