This essay broadens the conversation on the state of organizational contradictions and paradox research by turning to dialectics—a time-honored, living perspective on social processes and relations, which continues to influence our understanding of the past, present, and future. Dialectics distinctive relational process worldview sets it apart from approaches stressing equilibrium, linearity, and coherence, making it highly relevant to a world in flux. I propose that dialectics is already present in strategy research and in contemporary business, and can become even more central to strategy, addressing core questions in the field and propelling it in new directions. Strategy scholars can draw on dialectics principles as a generative tool kit to construct new theories and managerial tools. Dialectics can also be used as a theoretical lens to understand emerging empirical phenomena such as the rapid advent of artificial intelligence. Finally, dialectics critical stance and philosophical grounding makes it a particularly attractive perspective for challenging existing theoretical models and for considering alternatives.
AbbottA (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottA (2004) Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences (Contemporary Societies Series). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
3.
AdlerPS (2009) Marx and organization studies today. In: AdlerPS (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies: Classical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 62–91.
4.
AhujaGCapronLLenoxMet al. (2018) Strategy and the institutional envelope. Strategy Science3(2): iii–x.
5.
AkerlofGAShillerRJ (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
AstleyWGVan de VenAH (1983) Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly28(2): 245–273.
8.
BansalPDesJardineMR (2014) Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization12(1): 70–78.
9.
BarleySR (2016) 60th anniversary essay: Ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Administrative Science Quarterly61(1): 1–8.
10.
BarnettWPLevinthalDA (2017) Special issue introduction: Evolutionary logics of strategy and organization. Strategy Science2(1): ii–vi.
11.
BaxterLAMontgomeryBM (1996) Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
12.
BeiserFC (1993) The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BensonJK (1977) Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly22(1): 1–21.
14.
BhaskarR (2009) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Routledge.
15.
BodrožićZAdlerPS (2017) The evolution of management models: A neo-Schumpeterian model. Administrative Science Quarterly63(1): 85–129.
16.
BourdieuP (2014) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
BrandenburgerA (2017) Where do great strategies really come from?Strategy Science2(4): 220–225.
18.
BurgelmanR (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly28(2): 223–244.
19.
CarverT (ed.) (1991) The Cambridge Companion to Marx, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ChilesTHBluedornACGuptaVK (2007) Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies28(4): 467–493.
21.
CunhaMPPutnamLL (2018) Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 31 October. DOI: 10.1177/1476127017739536.
22.
DenisJLDompierreGLangleyAet al. (2011) Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organization Science22(1): 225–244.
23.
DurandR (2012) Advancing strategy and organization research in concert: Towards an integrated model?Strategic Organization10(3): 297–303.
24.
DurandRGrantRMMadsenTL (2017) The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration. Strategic Management Journal38(1): 4–16.
25.
EisenhardtKMBinghamCB (2017) Superior strategy in entrepreneurial settings: Thinking, doing, and the logic of opportunity. Strategy Science2(4): 246–257.
26.
ElliottJE (1980) Marx and Schumpeter on capitalism’s creative destruction: A comparative restatement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics95(1): 45–68.
27.
ElsterJ (1985) Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FarjounM (2002) The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the online database industry. Academy of Management Journal45(5): 848–874.
29.
FarjounM (2017) Contradictions, dialectics and paradox. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 87–109.
30.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2012) A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
FunkRJHirschmanD (2017) Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Academy of Management Review42(1): 32–52.
32.
GavettiGPoracJ (2018) On the origin of great strategies. Strategy Science3(1): 352–365.
33.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
34.
GulatiRPuranamP (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science20(2): 422–440.
35.
HambrickDC (2004) The disintegration of strategic management: It’s time to consolidate our gains. Strategic Organization2(1): 91–98.
36.
HargraveTJVan de VenAH (2017) Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies38(3–4): 319–339.
37.
HernesG (1976) Structural change in social processes. American Journal of Sociology82(3): 513–547.
38.
HookS (1962) From Hegel to Marx. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
IlyenkovEV (1960/1982) The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital (trans. KuzyakovS). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
40.
JarzabkowskiP (2003) Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies40(1): 23–55.
41.
JarzabkowskiP (2008) Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal51(4): 621–650.
42.
KingBGWalkerET (2014) Winning hearts and minds: Field theory and the three dimensions of strategy. Strategic Organization12(2): 134–141.
43.
LangleyA (2007) Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization5(3): 271–282.
44.
LangleyASloanP (2011) Organizational change and dialectics processes. In: BurnesBHassardJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 261–275.
45.
LangleyATsoukasH (eds) (2017) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE.
46.
LebowitzMA (1976) Marx’s falling rate of profit: A dialectical view. Canadian Journal of Economics9(2): 232–254.
47.
LevinsRLewontinR (1985) The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
49.
McKayRNChiaR (2013) Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of NorthCo Automotive. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 208–230.
50.
MathewsJA (2006) Strategizing, Disequilibrium, and Profit. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
51.
MillerD (1990) The Icarus Paradox: How Excellent Organizations Can Bring about Their Own Downfall. New York: Harper Business.
52.
MorganG (2006) Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
NicholsonDJDupréJ (eds) (2018) Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
NicoliniD (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
OllmanB (2003) Dance of the Dialectics: Steps in Marx’s Method. Urbana, IL; Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
56.
OllmanB (2015) Marxism and the philosophy of internal relations; or, how to replace the mysterious “paradox” with “contradictions” that can be studied and resolved. Capital & Class39(1): 7–23.
57.
PanayiotouAPutnamLLKassinisG (2018) Generating tensions: A multilevel, process analysis of organizational change. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 21 November. DOI: 10.1177/1476127017734446.
58.
PattersonTC (2018) Social Change Theories in Motion. New York: Routledge.
59.
PenroseET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Sharpe.
60.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the 21st Century (trans. GoldhammerA). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
61.
PodolnyJM (2018) An exploration of discerning search. Strategy Science3(1): 295–305.
62.
PowellTC (2018) Absence-neglect and the origins of great strategies. Strategy Science3(1): 306–312.
63.
RaoHDattaS (2018) Why great strategies spring from identity movements. Strategy Science3(1): 313–322.
SchadJLewisMWSmithWK (2018) Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 10 July. DOI: 10.1177/1476127018786218.
66.
SchneiderL (1971) Dialectics in sociology. American Sociological Review36(4): 667–678.
67.
SchumpeterJA (1942) Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Van de VenAHPooleMS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review20(3): 510–540.
71.
VidalEMitchellW (2018) Virtuous or vicious cycles? The role of divestitures as a complementary Penrose effect within resource-based theory. Strategic Management Journal39(1): 131–154.
72.
WhittingtonR (2012) Big strategy/small strategy. Strategic Organization10(3): 263–268.
73.
WinterSG (2013) Habit, deliberation, and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives27(2): 120–137.
74.
ZingalesL (2017) Towards a political theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(3): 113–130.
