Which signal to rely on? The impact of the quality of board interlocks and inventive capabilities on research and development alliance formation under uncertainty
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2013
Which signal to rely on? The impact of the quality of board interlocks and inventive capabilities on research and development alliance formation under uncertainty
In this study, we demonstrate that the quality of a firm’s board interlocks and a firm’s inventive capabilities can serve as signals of its quality as a research and development alliance partner to other firms. The extent of the signaling effects, however, varies under different types of uncertainty. Using research and development alliance, patent and board interlock data from the US biotechnology industry during the period 1990–2003, we find that the board interlock quality as well as the strength and focus of a firm’s inventive capabilities have positive and significant effects on the likelihood of research and development alliance formation. Importantly, we further find that the impact of the strength of a firm’s inventive capabilities is weaker, while the impact of the quality of the firm’s board interlocks is stronger, under both market uncertainty and firm-specific uncertainty. The implications for studies of board interlocks, uncertainty, and research and development alliances are discussed.
AhujaG. (2000) “The Duality of Collaborations: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages,” Strategic Management Journal21: 317–43.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage.
3.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992) “Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly37: 634–61.
4.
BaumJ.CalabreseT.SilvermanB. (2000) “Don’t Go it Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology,” Strategic Management Journal21(special issue): 267–94.
5.
BeckmanC.HaunschildP. R. (2002) “Network Learning: The Effects of Partners’ Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions,” Administrative Science Quarterly47: 92–124.
6.
BeckmanC.HaunschildP. R.PhillipsD. (2004) “Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection,” Organization Science15: 259–75.
7.
BonacichP. (1987) “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures,” American Journal of Sociology92: 1170–83.
8.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
9.
BrickleyJ.SmithC.ZimmermanJ. (1995) “The Economics of Organizational Architecture,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance8: 19–31.
10.
CarpenterM. A.FredricksonJ. W. (2001) “Top Management Teams, Global Strategic Posture, and the Moderating Role of Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Journal44: 533–46.
11.
CohenW.LevinthalD. (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128–52.
12.
ColesJ.DanielN.NaveenL. (2008) “Boards: Does One Size Fit All?” Journal of Financial Economics87: 329–56.
13.
CyertR.MarchJ. (1963) The Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
DasT.TengB. (2000) “A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances,” Journal of Management26: 31–61.
15.
DavisG. F. (1991) “Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network,” Administrative Science Quarterly36: 583–613.
16.
DavisG.YooM.BakerW. (2003) “The Small World of the American Corporate Elite, 1982–2001,” Strategic Organization1: 301–26.
17.
DiMasiJ. (1995) “Research and Development Costs for New Drugs by Therapeutic Category,” PharmacoEconomics7: 152–69.
18.
DosiG. (1988) “Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Literature26: 1120–71.
19.
DyerJ.SinghH. (1998) “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review23: 660–79.
20.
EisenhardtK.SchoonhovenC. (1996) “Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms,” Organization Science7: 136–50.
21.
FlemingL. (2001) “Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search,” Management Science47: 117–32.
22.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1985) “Interorganizational Relations,” Annual Review of Sociology11: 281–304.
23.
GlaisterK.BuckleyP. (1996) “Strategic Motives for International Alliance Formation,” Journal of Management Studies33: 301–32.
24.
GlismannH.HornE. (1988) “Comparative Invention Performance of Major Industrial Countries: Patterns and Explanations,” Management Science34: 1169–87.
25.
GopalakrishnanS.ScillitoeJ.SantoroM. (2008) “Tapping Deep Pockets: The Role of Resources and Social Capital on Financial Capital Acquisition by Biotechnology Firms in Biote-Pharma Alliances,” Journal of Management Studies45: 1354–76.
26.
GouldR. (2002) “The Origin of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test,” American Journal of Sociology107: 1143–78.
27.
GreveH. (2003) “A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding,” Academy of Management Journal46: 685–702.
28.
GulatiR. (1995) “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances,” Academy of Management Journal38: 85–112.
29.
GulatiR.LavieD.SinghH. (2009) “The Nature of Partnering Experience and the Gains from Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal30: 1213–33.
30.
HallB.JaffeA.TrajtenbergM. (2005) “Market Value and Patent Citations,” Rand Journal of Economics36: 16–38.
31.
HallockK. (1997) “Reciprocally Interlocking Boards of Directors and Executive Compensation,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis32: 331–44.
32.
HamelG. (1991) “Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning within International Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal12: 83–103.
33.
HaunschildP. R. (1993) “Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity,” Administrative Science Quarterly38: 564–92.
34.
HaunschildP. R.BeckmanC. (1998) “When Do Interlocks Matter? Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence,” Administrative Science Quarterly43: 815–44.
35.
HausmanJ. (1978) “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica46: 1251–71.
36.
HoangH.RothaermelF. (2005) “The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance,” Academy of Management Journal48: 332–45.
37.
HoetkerG.SwaminathanA.MitchellW. (2007) “The Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Modular and Architectural Component Suppliers,” Management Science53(2): 178–91.
38.
HoggM.MullinB. A. A. (1999) “Joining Groups to Reduce Uncertainty: Subjective Uncertainty Reduction and Group Identification,” in AbramsD.HoggM. A. (eds) Social Identity and Social Cognition, pp. 249–78. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
HoggM.TerryD. (2000) “Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review25: 121–40.
40.
HsuG. (2006) “Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences’ Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production,” Administrative Science Quarterly51: 420–50.
41.
HsuG.HannanM.KoçakO. (2009) “Multiple Category Membership in Markets: A Formal Theory and Two Empirical Tests,” American Sociological Review74: 150–69.
42.
HwangB.KimS. (2009) “It Pays to Have Friends,” Journal of Financial Economics93: 138–58.
43.
JanneyJ.FoltaT. (2006) “Moderating Effects of Investor Experience on the Signaling Value of Private Equity Placements,” Journal of Business Venturing21: 27–44.
44.
JungT. (2009) Uses and nonuses of patented inventions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.
45.
KatilaR.AhujaG. (2002) “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introductions,” Academy of Management Journal45: 1183–94.
46.
KeatsB.HittM. (1988) “A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal31: 570–98.
47.
KhiljiS.MroczkowskiT.BernsteinB. (2006) “From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms,” Journal of Product Innovation Management23: 528–40.
48.
LangJ. R.LockhartD. E. (1990) “Increased Environmental Uncertainty and Changes in Board Linkage Patterns,” Academy of Management Journal33: 106–28.
49.
LarckerD.RichardsonS.SearyA.TunaA. (2005) Back door links between executives and executive compensation. Working Paper, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, February.
50.
LavieD.RosenkopfL. (2006) “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation,” Academy of Management Journal49: 797–818.
51.
LavieD.LechnerC.SinghH. (2007) “The Performance Implications of Timing of Entry and Involvement in Multipartner Alliances,” Academy of Management Journal50: 578–604.
52.
LeblebiciH.SalancikG. (1981) “Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on Information and Decision Processes in Banks,” Administrative Science Quarterly26: 578–96.
53.
LiD.EdenL.HittM.IrelandR. D. (2008) “Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Partner Selection in R&D Alliances,” Academy of ManagementJournal51: 315–34.
54.
LiS.RowleyT. (2002) “Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Alliance Selection Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal45: 1104–19.
55.
LinkA.BauerL. (1989) Cooperative Research in Manufacturing. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
56.
MarchJ. (1991) “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science2: 71–87.
57.
MillikenF. J. (1987) “Three Types of Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Review12: 133–43.
58.
MitsuhashiH.GreveH. (2009) “A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility,” Academy of Management Journal52: 975–95.
59.
MizruchiM. (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
MizruchiM. (1996) “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates,” Annual Review of Sociology22: 271–98.
61.
MoweryD. C. (1988) “Collaborative Ventures Between U.S. and Foreign Manufacturing Firms: An Overview,” in MoweryD. C. (ed.) International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing, pp. 1–22. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
62.
NdoforH. A.LevitasE. (2004) “Signaling the Strategic Value of Knowledge,” Journal of Management30: 685–702.
63.
NelsonR.WinterS. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
NunnallyJ. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65.
Owen-SmithJ.PowellW. W. (2004) “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community Knowledge,” Organization Science15(1): 5–21.
66.
OzmelU.ReuerJ.GulatiR. (2013) “Signals across Multiple Networks: How Venture Capital and Alliance Networks Affect Interorganizational Collaboration,” Academy Management Journal56(3): pp 852–866.
67.
PalmerD.JenningsD.ZhouX. (1993) “Late Adoption of the Multidivisional form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts,” Administrative Science Quarterly38: 100–31.
68.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
69.
PisanoG.TeeceD. (1989) “Collaborative Arrangements and Global Technology Strategy: Some Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Industry,” in RosenbloomR.BurglemanR. (eds) Research on Technological Innovation Management and Policy, pp. 227–256. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70.
PodolnyJ. M. (1993) “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition,” American Journal of Sociology98: 829–72.
71.
PodolnyJ. M. (2001) “Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market,” American Journal of Sociology107: 33–60.
72.
PollockT.ChenG.JacksonE.HambrickD. (2010) “How Much Prestige is Enough? Assessing the Value of Multiple Types of High-Status Affiliates for Young Firms,” Journal of Business Venturing25: 6–23.
73.
PólosL.HannanM.CarrollG. (2002) “Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms,” Industrial and Corporate Change11: 85–115.
74.
PowellW.KoputK.Smith-DoerrL. (1996) “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly411: 116–36.
75.
PowellW.KoputK.Smith-DoerrL.Owen-SmithJ. (1999) “Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry,” in AndrewsS.KnokeD. (eds) Networks in and around Organizations, pp. 129–159. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76.
RobertsE. (1988) “Managing Invention and Innovation.” Research Technology Management31: 11–27.
77.
RollerL.SiebertR.TombakM. (2007) “Why Firms Form (or do not Form) RJVs,” Economic Journal117: 1122–44.
78.
RosenkopfL.NerkarA. (2001) “Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disc Industry,” Strategic Management Journal22: 287–306.
79.
RothaermelF. T. (2001) “Incumbent’s Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation,” Strategic Management Journal22(special issue): 687–99.
80.
RothaermelF. T.BoekerW. (2008) “Old Technology Meets New Technology: Complementarities, Similarities, and Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal29: 47–77.
81.
RothaermelF. T.DeedsD. L. (2004) “Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal25(3): 201–21.
82.
RowleyT.BehrensD.KrackhardtD. (2000) “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,” Strategic Management Journal21: 369–86.
83.
SakakibaraM. (2002) “Formation of R&D Consortia: Industry and Company Effects,” Strategic Management Journal23: 1033–50.
84.
SampsonR. (2007) “R&D Alliance and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation,” Academy of Management Journal50: 364–86.
85.
SchumpeterJ. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
ShipilovA.GreveH.RowleyT. (2009) “When Do Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices,” Academy of Management Journal53: 846–64.
87.
StuartT. E. (1998) “Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly43: 668–98.
88.
StuartT. E.PodolnyJ. (1996) “Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal17(special issue): 21–38.
89.
StuartT. E.HongH.HybelsR. C. (1999) “Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures,” Administrative Science Quarterly44: 315–49.
90.
SullivanB. N.HaunschildP. R.PageK. (2007) “Organizations Non-Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Behavior on Interorganizational Networks,” Organization Science18: 55–70.
91.
TeeceD. (1986) “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy,” Research Policy15: 285–305.
92.
TengB. (2007) “Corporate Entrepreneurship Activities through Strategic Alliances: A Resource-Based Approach toward Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management Studies44: 119–42.
93.
ThompsonJ. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
94.
TrajtenbergM.JaffeA.HendersonR. (1997) “University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology5: 19–50.
UrbanS.VendeminiS. (1992) European Strategic Alliances: Co-operative Corporate Strategies in the New Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
97.
VanhaverbekeW.DuystersG.NoorderhavenN. (2002) “External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry,” Organization Science13: 714–33.
98.
VeneziaI. (1980) “The Effect of Increased Variance on the Duration of Search: A Note,” Journal of Economic Theory23: 127–9.
99.
WeintraubA. (2004) “Repairing the engines of life: Can research into stem cells and other advanced techniques heal ailing hearts and brains?” Business Week, 24May, pp. 98–106.
100.
WestphalJ. D. (1998) “Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management,” Administrative Science Quarterly43: 511–37.
101.
WestphalJ. D.KhannaP. (2003) “Keeping Directors in Line: Social Distancing as a Control Mechanism in the Corporate Elite,” Administrative Science Quarterly48: 361–98.
102.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. (1997) “Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity, and the Diffusion of board Independence in U.S. Corporations,” Administrative Science Quarterly42: 161–83.
103.
WhittingtonK. B.Owen-SmithJ.PowellW. W. (2009) “Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries,” Administrative Science Quarterly54(1): 90–122.
104.
WilliamsonO. (1981) “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” American Journal of Sociology87: 548–77.
105.
XuB. (2005) “R&D Strategy and Stock Price Volatility in the Biotechnology Industry,” Review of Accounting and Finance5: 59–71.
106.
ZuckermanE. (1999) “The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount,” American Journal of Sociology104: 1398–438.
