This article focuses on the relation between strategy-as-practice and its power effects in the context of a strategy project (Sustainable Sydney 2030) undertaken by the City of Sydney. The following three interrelated questions guided the enquiry: How is strategy practised? What knowledge is it based upon? And what are its power effects? Based on a detailed empirical analysis of the strategy-making process, the article charts how strategy rendered the city knowable and how performative effects of strategizing mobilized the public and legitimized outcomes of the process while silencing other voices. The article’s theoretical contribution is threefold: first, it shows that strategizing is performative, constituting its subjects and shaping its objects; second, that strategizing has to be understood as aesthetic performance whose power resides in the simultaneous representation of facts (traditionally the domain of science) and values (the realm of politics); third, and consequently, that strategy is a sociopolitical practice that aims at mobilizing people, marshalling political will and legitimizing decisions. The article concludes with reflections on five practical implications of the study.
AnsoffH. I. (1965) Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AustinJ. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.
3.
BachrachP.BaratzM. S. (1962) ‘Two Faces of Power’, The American Political Science Review56(4): 947–52.
4.
BarryD.ElmesM. (1997) ‘Strategy Retold: Towards a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse’, Academy of Management Review22(2): 429–52.
5.
BarzelayM. (1992) Breaking Through Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BenjaminW. (2007 [1936]) ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in ArendtH.(ed.) Walter Benjamin: Illuminations. Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken Books.
7.
BojeD. (2008) The Storytelling Organization. London: Sage.
8.
BourdieuP. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (2007 [1979]) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
10.
BrillembourgA.FeireissK.KlumpnerH. (eds) (2005) Informal City: Caracas Case. Munich and New York: Prestel Publishing.
11.
BurdettR.SudjicD. (eds) (2007) The Endless City. London and New York: Phaidon.
12.
CastellsM. (2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ClarkeJ.NewmanJ. (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.
14.
ClarkeJ.NewmanJ.SmithN.VidlerE.WestmarlandL. (2007) Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Identities in the Remaking of Public Services. London: Sage.
15.
CleggS. R. (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
16.
ColeM.ParstonG. (2006) Unlocking Public Value. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
ColemanS.GøtzeJ. (2001) Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
18.
CollinsH. M.EvansR. J. (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
ConsidineM. (1988) ‘The Corporate Management Framework as Administrative Science: A Critique’, Australian Journal of Public Administration47(1): 4–18.
20.
ConsidineM. (1990) ‘Managerialism Strikes Out’, Australian Journal of Public Administration49(2): 166–78.
21.
Czarniawska-JoergesB.SevónG. (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen.
22.
Du GayP. (2000) In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber/Organization/Ethics. London: Sage.
23.
ErikssonP.LehtimäkiH. (2001) ‘Strategy Rhetoric in City Management: How the Presumptions of Classic Strategic Management Live on?’, Scandinavian Journal of Management17(2): 201–24.
24.
EzzamelM.WillmottH. (2004) ‘Rethinking Strategy: Contemporary Perspectives and Debates’, European Management Review1(1): 43–8.
25.
FerlieE.PettigrewA.AshburnerA.FitzgeraldL. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
FlyvbjergB. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FlyvbjergB. (2002) ‘Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Story’, in ThornleyA.RydinY. (eds) Planning in a Global Era, pp. 117–41. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28.
FoucaultM. (1972) The Order of Discourse. New York: Pantheon Books.
29.
FoucaultM. (1977) Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
30.
FriedmanJ. (1998) ‘Planning Theory Revisited’, European Planning Studies6(3): 245–53.
31.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
32.
GramsciA. (1971 [1929–35]) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
33.
HackworthJ. (2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
HardyC.PalmerI.PhillipsN. (2000) ‘Discourse as a Strategic Resource’, Human Relations53(9): 1227–48.
35.
HarveyD. (1989) ‘From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism’, Geografiska Annaler B. 71: 3–17.
36.
HaydnF.TemelR. (eds) (2006) Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the Use of City Spaces. Berlin: Birkhauser.
37.
HecloH. (1978) ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, in KingA. (ed.) The New American Political System, pp. 87–124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
38.
HochC. (1994) What Do Planners Do? Power, Politics, and Persuasion. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
39.
HoodC. (1995) ‘The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society20(2/3): 93–109.
40.
KnightsD.MorganG. (1991) ‘Strategic Discourse and Subjectivity: Towards a Critical Analysis of Corporate Strategy in Organizations’, Organisation Studies12(3): 251–73.
41.
KornbergerM.CarterC. (2010) ‘Manufacturing Competition: How Accounting Practices Shape Strategy Making in Cities’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal23(3): 325–49.
42.
LatourB. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
LatourB.WeibelP. (eds) (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
MacKenzieD. (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
McLuhanM. (1964) Understanding Media. New York: Mentor.
47.
MantereS.VaaraE. (2008) ‘On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective’, Organization Science19(2): 341–58.
48.
MarresN.RogersR. (2005) ‘Recipe for Tracing the Fate of Issues and their Publics on the Web’, in LatourB.WeibelP. (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, pp. 922–35. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
MassumiB. (2003) ‘Urban Appointment: A Possible Rendez-Vouz with the City’, in BrouwerJ.MulderA. (eds) Making Art from Databases, pp. 28–55. Rotterdam: V2 Organisatie/Dutch Architecture Institute.
50.
MintzbergH. (1987) ‘The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy, and Strategy Concept II: Another Look at Why Organizations Need Strategies’, California Management Review30(1): 11–32.
51.
MooreM. H. (1995) Creating Public Value Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992) Re-Inventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
PainterM. (1988) ‘Public Management: Fad or Fallacy’, Australian Journal of Public Administration47(1): 1–3.
54.
PälliP.VaaraE.SorsaV. (2009) ‘Strategy as Text and Discursive Practice: A Genre-Based Approach to Strategizing in City Administration’, Discourse and Communication3(3): 303–18.
55.
PettigrewA. (1985) The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change at ICI. Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
PorterM. (1980) Competitive Positioning. New York: The Free Press.
57.
PunterJ. (2005) ‘Urban Design in Central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and Discretionary Traditions in the Accidental City’, Progress in Planning63(1): 11–160.
58.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973) ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning’, Public Sciences4(2): 155–69.
59.
Samra-FredericksD. (2003) ‘Strategizing as Lived Experience and Strategists’ Everyday Efforts to Shape Strategic Direction’, Journal of Management Studies40(1): 141–74.
60.
Samra-FredericksD. (2005) ‘Strategic Practice, “Discourse” and the Everyday Interactional Constitution of “Power Effects”’, Organization12(6): 803–41.
61.
SchüllerN.WollenbergP.ChristiaanseK. (eds) (2009) Urban Reports – Urban Strategies and Visions in Mid-Sized Cities in a Local and Global Context. Zürich: gta Verlag.
62.
SearleG.BunkerR. (2010) ‘Metropolitan Strategic Planning: An Australian Paradigm?’, Planning Theory9(3): 163–80.
63.
SearleJ. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
64.
SerresM.LatourB. (1995 [1990]) Conversations on Science, Culture and Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
65.
TurnerV. (1974) The Ritual Process. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
66.
VaaraE. (2010) ‘Taking the Linguistic Turn Seriously: Strategy as Multifaceted and Interdiscursive Phenomenon’, Advances in Strategic Management27: 29–50.
67.
VaaraE.SorsaV.PälliP. (2010) ‘On the Force Potential of Strategy Texts: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Strategic Plan and its Power Effects in a City Organization’, Organization17(6): 685–702.
68.
Van GennepA. (1960) The Rites of Passage. London and New York: Routledge.
69.
WhittingtonR. (2003) ‘The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective’, Strategic Organization1(1): 117–25.
ZukinS. (2007) ‘Architecture and the Social Framework of Power’, in De BaanC.DeclerckJ.PatteeuwV. (eds) Power: Producing the Contemporary City, pp. 59–68. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.
