Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most literature examining firms’ make and buy decisions fails to explore when firms use both governance structures for similar transactions. We examine this phenomenon in the trucking industry, where it is common for a carrier to use both employee drivers and outsourcing at the same time. We argue that efficiency, appropriability and competition concerns lead carriers to organize on a haul-by-haul basis.We empirically examine our theory using a unique data from a small trucking firm in St Louis, MO, and find broad support for our hypotheses.We also discuss the possibility of alternative explanations of market power, capacity constraint, agency theory and property right theory for the use of make and buy. We conclude that these theories do not explain this phenomenon in the trucking industry. Thus, we conclude that it is the interaction of efficiency, appropriability and competition concerns that drive the decision to make and buy in the trucking industry.We further postulate that these concerns can manifest themselves in other industries, suggesting that our theory has applicability beyond trucking.

Keywords

appropriability competition efficiency integration networks trucking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’ , American Economic Review 62: 777–795 .

Baker, G. and Hubbard, T. (2003) ‘Make Versus Buy in Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design and Information’ , American Economic Review 93: 551–572 .

Baker, G. and Hubbard, T. (2004) ‘Contractibility and Asset Ownership: On-Board Computers and Governance in U.S. Trucking’ , Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 1443–1480 .

Bradach, J. L. (1998) Franchise Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .

Brown, B. and Butler, J. E. (1995) ‘Competitors as Allies: A Study of Entrepreneurial Networks in the U.S. Wine Industry’ , Journal of Small Business Management(July): 57–66 .

Chatman, J. A. (1991) ‘Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms’ , Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 459–484 .

Cooper, R. and John, A. (1988) ‘Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models’ , Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 441–463 .

Corts, K. (2000) ‘The Interaction of Task and Asset Allocation in Multi-task Agency Relationships’. Harvard Business School working paper #01–049.

Grossman, S.J. and Hart, O. D. (1986) ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Lateral and Vertical Integration,’ Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–791 .

10.

Hubbard, T. (2001) ‘Contractual Form and Market Thickness in Trucking’ , RAND Journal of Economics 32: 369–386 .

11.

Ingram, P. and Roberts, P. W. (2000) ‘Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney hotel industry’ , American Journal of Sociology 106(2): 387–423 .

12.

Lanfontaine, F. and Masten, S. E. (2002) ‘Contracting in the Absence of Specific Investments and Moral Hazard: Understanding Carrier-Driver Relations in U.S. Trucking’. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working paper #8859.

13.

Masten, S. E. , Meehan, J. and Snyder, E. (1991) ‘The Costs of Organization’ , Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 1–25 .

14.

Mayer, K. and Nickerson, J. A. (2005) ‘Antecedents and Performance Implications of Contracting for Knowledge Workers: Evidence from Information Technology Services’ , Organizational Science 1(3): 225–242 .

15.

Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, Organization, and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .

16.

Nickerson, J. A. and Silverman, B. S. (2003) ‘Why Aren’t All Truck Drivers Owner-operators? Asset Ownership in Interstate For-hire Trucking’ , Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12: 91–118 .

17.

Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press .

18.

Robins, J. A. (1989) ‘Managerial Strategy and Organization: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Tapered Integration of American Film Production’. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

19.

Silverman, B. S. , Nickerson, J. A. and Freeman, J. (1997) ‘Profitability, Transactional Alignment, and Organizational Mortality in the U.S. Trucking Industry,’ Strategic Management Journal 18 (special issue): 31–52 .

20.

Teece, D. J. (1986) ‘Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy’ , Research Policy 15: 285–305 .

21.

Uzzi, B. (1996) ‘The Sources and Consequences of Indebtedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect’ , American Sociological Review 61: 674–698 .

22.

Uzzi, B. (1999) ‘Indebtedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing’ , American Sociological Review 64: 441–505 .

23.

Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press .

Why do firms make and buy? Efficiency,appropriability and competition in the trucking industry

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References