This study presents a comprehensive long-term structural health monitoring approach for the Garisenda Tower in Bologna, Italy, combining multiple non-destructive techniques. Over a 6-year period, data from acoustic emission (AE), fibre optic sensors, and a pendulum system were integrated to assess the tower’s micro- and macro-scale damage mechanisms, as well as global movements. Advanced statistical analyses—such as b-value, Hurst exponent, natural time, and critical fluctuation methods—were applied to AE time series, revealing damage evolution and shifts in structural behaviour around 2023. Results suggest that thermally induced stresses primarily drive damage progression initially, with microcracking strongly correlated to seasonal temperature variations. Post-2023, a transition towards autonomous damage processes was observed, indicating increased instability. The combined data confirm ongoing internal deterioration, emphasizing the importance of multi-technique, long-term monitoring for heritage preservation. Findings support proactive interventions to safeguard this iconic medieval structure against progressive instability.
BaraccaniSAzzaraRMGaspariniG, et al. Identification through seismometric measurements of transients propagating inside the Asinelli and Garisenda Towers (Bologna, Italy), implication on structural modeling and state of health monitoring. Eccomas Proceedia2019; 3881–3892. https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.7193.19071
2.
BaraccaniSPiccoloAGaspariniG, et al. An assessment of the structural behaviour of the Garisenda Tower in Bologna through finite element modelling and structural health monitoring. Eccomas Proceedia2019; 5416–5422. https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.7314.19061
3.
CavaniF. Movimenti della sommità rispetto alla base nella torre Garisenda di Bologna. Memorie della Regia Accademia delle Scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna – Classe di Scienze Fisiche1901; VII: 317–330.
4.
DallavalleGDi TommasoAGottardiG, et al. The Garisenda Tower in Bologna: effects of degradation of selenite basement on its static behaviour. In: LancellottaRViggianiCFloraA, et al. (eds) Geotechnical engineering for the preservation of monuments and historic sites III. CRC Press, 2022, pp. 1088–1100.
5.
PesciACasulaGBoschiE. Laser scanning the Garisenda and Asinelli Towers in Bologna (Italy): detailed deformation patterns of two ancient leaning buildings. J Cult Herit2011; 12(2): 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2011.01.002
6.
PoluzziLBarbarellaMTavasciL, et al. Monitoring of the Garisenda Tower through GNSS using advanced approaches toward the frame of reference stations. J Cult Herit2019; 38: 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.008
7.
Di TommasoAOlivettiGCNiccoliniG, et al. Garisenda Tower in Bologna (Italy): health monitoring by different nondestructive testing techniques. Int J Masonry Res Innov2022; 9(1–2): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2024.135248
8.
Di TommasoAOlivettiGCLacidognaG, et al. Garisenda tower in Bologna (Italy): structural assessment and numerical simulation. Int J Masonry Res Innov2024; 9(4): 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2024.139556
9.
CarpinteriALacidognaGPugnoN. Structural damage diagnosis and life-time assessment by acoustic emission monitoring. Eng Fract Mech2007; 74: 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.036
LacidognaGMarin MontanariPInvernizziS, et al. The Garisenda Tower in Bologna: damage assessment results from principal component analysis, acoustic emission, and nonlinear finite element involving creep and smeared cracking. In: Proceedings of 21st international conference on experimental mechanics (ICEM21), European Society for Experimental Mechanics (EuraSEM), Bologna, Italy, 6–11 July 2025.
FriedrichLFTanziBNRColpoAB, et al. Analysis of acoustic emission activity during progressive failure in heterogeneous materials: experimental and numerical investigation. Appl Sci2022; 12: 3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083918
ShiotaniTFujiiKAokiT, et al. Evaluation of progressive failure using AE sources and improved b-value on slope model tests. Prog Acoust Emiss1994; 529: 534–536.
19.
CarpinteriALacidognaGPuzziS. From criticality to final collapse: evolution of the b-value from 1.5 to 1.0. Chaos Soliton Fract2009; 41(2): 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2008.04.010
20.
VarotsosPASarlisNVSkordasES. Detrended fluctuation analysis of the magnetic and electric field variations that precede rupture. Chaos2009; 19: 023114. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3130931
21.
GkarlaouniCLasockiSPapadimitriouE, et al. Hurst analysis of seismicity in Corinth rift and Mygdonia graben (Greece). Chaos Soliton Fract2017; 96: 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.001
VarotsosPASarlisNVSkordasES. Study of the temporal correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan. J Geophys Res Space Phys2014; 119: 9192–9206. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020580
24.
SkordasESChristopoulosSRGSarlisNV. Detrended fluctuation analysis of seismicity and order parameter fluctuations before the M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Nat Hazards2020; 100: 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03834-7
25.
VarotsosPASarlisNVSkordasES. Spatio-temporal complexity aspects on the interrelation between seismic electric signals and seismicity. Proc Athens Acad2001; 76: 294–321.
26.
VarotsosPASarlisNVSkordasES. Natural time analysis: the new view of time. Springer, 2011.
27.
VarotsosPASarlisNVSkordasES. Natural time analysis: the new view of time, part II. Springer Nature, 2023.
28.
VarotsosPASkordasESSarlisNV, et al. Review of the natural time analysis method and its applications. Mathematics2024; 12(22): 3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223582
29.
HloupisGStavrakasIVallianatosF, et al. A preliminary study for prefailure indicators in acoustic emissions using wavelets and natural time analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Des Appl2016; 230(3): 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715575337
30.
NiccoliniGManuelloAMarchisE, et al. Signal frequency distribution and natural-time analysis from acoustic emission monitoring of an arched structure in the Castle of Racconigi. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci2017; 10: 1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1025-2017
31.
FriedrichLFPadilhaMHLacidognaG, et al. Multiscale investigation of seismic precursors before major earthquakes. Mech Res Commun2025; 147: 104449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104449
32.
FriedrichLFCezarESColpoAB, et al. Identifying impending failure in heterogeneous materials: a study on acoustic emission time series. Chaos Soliton Fract2024; 185: 115172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115172
PotirakisSMContoyiannisYSchekotovA, et al. Evidence of critical dynamics in various electromagnetic precursors. Eur Phys J Spec Top2021; 230: 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000252-8
35.
HansenAHemmerPPradhanS. The fiber bundle model: modeling failure in materials. Statistical physics of fracture and breakdown. Wiley, 2015.
BirckGRieraJDIturriozI. Numerical DEM simulation of AE in plate fracture and analogy with the frequency of seismic events in SCRs. Eng Fail Anal2018; 93: 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.024
