When transducers are integrated with concrete structures for condition monitoring, conventional lead zirconate titanate-based transducers, due to their inherent brittleness, unfortunately, are prone to interference from structural strains and deformations induced by external loads, restricting their effectiveness in continuous damage monitoring. With this motivation, this work designs a flexible piezoelectric skin (FPS) that exploits the unique properties of the macro fiber composites (MFCs), including their architectural simplicity, scalability and excellent flexibility. The MFCs serve as the foundational transceiver elements, enabling damage sensing in concrete structures under varying loading conditions. Assisted with the defined general damage sensitive index, the FPS is able to capture critical damage signatures to track damage progression of the monitored area, offering continuous and reliable damage evaluation. The experimental explorations demonstrate that the MFC array-based FPS possesses active damage sensing capabilities on concrete interfaces while delivering promising performance in terms of flexibility, sensitivity, and reliability. The conformal FPS serves as a feasible strategy for continuous condition monitoring of concrete structures, facilitating long-term structural integrity assessment in civil engineering applications.
MishraMLourençoPBRamanaGV. Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures by using the internet of things: a review. J Build Eng2022; 48: 103954.
2.
GomasaRTalakokulaVKalyana Rama JyosyulaS, et al. A review on health monitoring of concrete structures using embedded piezoelectric sensor. Constr Build Mater2023; 405: 133179.
3.
ZhangMZhouDLiX, et al. A time-reversal assisted probabilistic fusion strategy for damage localization in plate-like structures using Lamb waves. Struct Health Monitor2023; 22: 3579–3603.
4.
DasSSahaP. A review of some advanced sensors used for health diagnosis of civil engineering structures. Measurement2018; 129: 68–90.
5.
SuZLinYYeL. Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. J Sound Vib2006; 295: 753–780.
6.
SongGGuHMoY-L. Smart aggregates: multi-functional sensors for concrete structures—a tutorial and a review. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17: 033001.
7.
ChenHXuBZhouT, et al. Debonding detection for rectangular CFST using surface wave measurement: test and multi-physical fields numerical simulation. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 117: 238–254.
8.
WangYLiXLiJ, et al. Debonding damage detection of the CFRP-concrete interface based on piezoelectric ceramics by the wave-based method. Constr Build Mater2019; 210: 514–524.
9.
ParkSYunC-BRohY, et al. PZT-based active damage detection techniques for steel bridge components. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15: 957.
10.
Sabet DivsholiBYangY. Combined embedded and surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers for monitoring of concrete structures. NDT E Int2014; 65: 28–34.
11.
FengQKongQSongG. Damage detection of concrete piles subject to typical damage types based on stress wave measurement using embedded smart aggregates transducers. Measurement2016; 88: 345–352.
12.
XuKDengQCaiL, et al. Damage detection of a concrete column subject to blast loads using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Sensors2018; 18: 1377.
13.
XuBZhangTSongG, et al. Active interface debonding detection of a concrete-filled steel tube with piezoelectric technologies using wavelet packet analysis. Mech Syst Sig Process2013; 36: 7–17.
14.
JiangS-FWangJTongS-Y, et al. Damage monitoring of concrete laminated interface using piezoelectric-based smart aggregate. Eng Struct2021; 228: 111489.
15.
KongQFanSBaiX, et al. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: part I. Fabrication and electrical characterization. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26: 095050.
16.
GaoWHuoLLiH, et al. Smart concrete slabs with embedded tubular PZT transducers for damage detection. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27: 025002.
17.
HuynhT-PHaickH. Autonomous flexible sensors for health monitoring. Adv Mater2018; 30: 1802337.
18.
LiuHWangLLinG, et al. Recent progress in the fabrication of flexible materials for wearable sensors. Biomater Sci2022; 10: 614–632.
19.
KhanYOstfeldAELochnerCM, et al. Monitoring of vital signs with flexible and wearable medical devices. Adv Mater2016; 28: 4373–4395.
20.
YinRWangDZhaoS, et al. Wearable sensors-enabled human–machine interaction systems: from design to application. Adv Function Mater2021; 31: 2008936.
21.
JiangSShenYWangS, et al. Flexible piezoelectric composite sensor for impact monitoring of curved structures. Sens Actuat A Phys2023; 362: 114655.
22.
YousryYMWongV-KJiR, et al. Shear mode ultrasonic transducers from flexible piezoelectric PLLA fibers for structural health monitoring. Adv Function Mater2023; 33: 2213582.
23.
DungCVSasakiE. Numerical simulation of output response of PVDF sensor attached on a cantilever beam subjected to impact loading. Sensors2016; 16: 601.
24.
HuPWangHTianG, et al. Multifunctional flexible sensor array-based damage monitoring for switch rail using passive and active sensing. Smart Mater Struct2020; 29: 095013.
25.
ZhuCXuZHouC, et al. Flexible, monolithic piezoelectric sensors for large-area structural impact monitoring via MUSIC-assisted machine learning. Struct Health Monitor2024; 23: 121–136.
26.
KangS-HKangMKangL-H. Defect detection on the curved surface of a wind turbine blade using piezoelectric flexible line sensors. Struct Health Monitor2022; 21: 1207–1217.
27.
WangGQiuWLiuY, et al. Damage detection for structural health monitoring using ultra-sensitive flexible piezoelectret sensors. Struct Health Monitor2023; 22: 2800–2812.
28.
ZhangXWangYGaoX, et al. High-temperature and flexible piezoelectric sensors for lamb-wave-based structural health monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13: 47764–47772.
29.
SodanoHAParkGInmanDJ. An investigation into the performance of macro-fiber composites for sensing and structural vibration applications. Mech Syst Sig Process2004; 18: 683–697.
30.
ThienABChiamoriHCChingJT, et al. The use of macro-fibre composites for pipeline structural health assessment. Struct Contr Health Monitor2008; 15: 43–63.
31.
LiWFangXChenX, et al. A damage detection method based on flexible macro-fiber composite. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure2023; 72: 1–9.
32.
Ruiz de la Hermosa González-CarratoRGarcía MárquezFPDimlayeV. Maintenance management of wind turbines structures via MFCs and wavelet transforms. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015; 48: 472–482.
33.
RojasEBaltazarALohKJ. Damage detection using the signal entropy of an ultrasonic sensor network. Smart Mater Struct2015; 24: 075008.
34.
MattHMScaleaFLD. Macro-fiber composite piezoelectric rosettes for acoustic source location in complex structures. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16: 1489–1499.
35.
StepinskiTMańkaMMartowiczA. Interdigital lamb wave transducers for applications in structural health monitoring. NDT E Int2017; 86: 199–210.
36.
PandeyAArockiarajanA. Fatigue study on the sensor performance of macro fiber composite (MFC): theoretical and experimental approach. Comp Struct2017; 174: 301–318.
37.
YuKLiLYuJ, et al. Direct tensile properties of engineered cementitious composites: a review. Constr Build Mater2018; 165: 346–362.
38.
JiJZhangZLinM, et al. Structural application of engineered cementitious composites (ECC): a state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater2023; 406: 133289.
39.
KongQRobertRHSilvaP, et al. Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl Sci2016; 6: 341.
40.
XuBChenHXiaS. Numerical study on the mechanism of active interfacial debonding detection for rectangular CFSTs based on wavelet packet analysis with piezoceramics. Mech Syst Sig Process2017; 86: 108–121.
41.
YangZLiYSangX, et al. Concrete implantable bar enabled smart sensing technology for structural health monitoring. Cement Concrete Comp2023; 139: 105035:
