Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Similarity relationship and principal component feature-considered deformation safety monitoring for the observation point group of in-service ultra-high arch dams
Given the deficiencies of existing methods, this work investigates a novel methodology for monitoring the deformation safety of in-service ultra-high arch dams. Regarding observation point group (OPG) with similar spatiotemporal deformation pattern as the modeling object, the deformation principal component (DPC) analysis model is constructed. Adaptive adjustment approach, Gaussian mutation disturbance, and Tent chaotic disturbance are introduced to optimize the search ability of sparrow search algorithm (SSA). Using the improved SSA, the parameter optimization approach of the DPC model is established. The four-level monitoring criteria are proposed by comprehensively considering the deviation degree between DPC and elastic state and the combined control limit of DPCs. Using the radial deformation observation data of the studied dam, the effectiveness of the proposed methodology is verified. The following findings are obtained. The established DPC analysis model can effectively reveal the main deformation patterns of OPGs. The improved SSA shortens the computation time, avoids premature convergence, and improves the DPC analysis model performance. The probabilistic and physical significance of the established four-level criteria is stricter than that of confidence interval criteria. Compared with confidence ellipsoid method, the proposed criteria are more conducive to practical engineering applications. The research provides technical support for the improvement of safety monitoring capability, disaster prevention, and lifetime extension of in-service ultra-high arch dams.
WangSWGuCSLiuY, et al. Displacement observation data-based structural health monitoring of concrete dams: a state-of-art review. Structures2024; 68: 107072.
2.
ZhuangDYMaKTangCN, et al. Study on crack formation and propagation in the galleries of the Dagangshan high arch dam in Southwest China based on microseismic monitoring and numerical simulation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci2019; 115: 157–172.
3.
WangXWLiuYRTaoZF, et al. Study on the failure process and nonlinear safety of high arch dam and foundation based on geomechanical model test. Eng Fail Anal2020; 116: 104704.
4.
GuCSZhuMYWuY, et al. Multi-output displacement health monitoring model for concrete gravity dam in severely cold region based on clustering of measured dam temperature field. Struct Health Monit2023; 22(5): 3416–3436.
5.
LiuXYLiZCSunLS, et al. A critical review of statistical model of dam monitoring data. J Build Eng2023; 80: 108106.
6.
WangSWXuYLGuCS, et al. Two spatial association-considered mathematical models for diagnosing the long-term balanced relationship and short-term fluctuation of the deformation behaviour of high concrete arch dams. Struct Health Monit2020; 19(5): 1421–1439.
7.
WangSWXuCLiuY, et al. A spatial association-coupled double objective support vector machine prediction model for diagnosing the deformation behaviour of high arch dams. Struct Health Monit2022; 21(3): 945–964.
8.
ZhangYZhangWWLiYL, et al. A multi-output prediction model for the high arch dam displacement utilizing the VMD-DTW partitioning technique and long-term temperature. Expert Syst Appl2025; 267: 126135.
9.
LiBYangJHuDX.Dam monitoring data analysis methods: a literature review. Struct Control Health Monit2020; 27(3).
10.
YangJQuXDHuDX, et al. Research on singular value detection method of concrete dam deformation monitoring. Measurement2021; 179: 109457.
11.
WangYKXiangYDaiB, et al. Dam early warning model based on structural anomaly identification and dynamic effect variables selection. Structures2025; 74: 108507.
12.
SuHZWenZPRenJ.A kernel principal component analysis-based approach for determining the spatial warning domain of dam safety. Soft Comput2020; 24(19): 14921–14931.
13.
ZhangKGuCSZhuYT, et al. A mathematical-mechanical hybrid driven approach for determining the deformation monitoring indexes of concrete dam. Eng Struct2023; 277: 115353.
14.
JiaDYYangJMaCH, et al. Research on arch dam deformation prediction method based on interpretability clustering and panel data model. Eng Struct2025; 329: 119794.
15.
ShaoCFGuCSYangM, et al. A novel model of dam displacement based on panel data. Struct Control Health Monit2017; 25: e2037.
16.
ChenZXLiuXS.Multi-point deformation prediction model for concrete dams based on spatial feature vector. Appl Sci2023; 13: 11212.
17.
HuJMaFH.Zoned deformation prediction model for super high arch dams using hierarchical clustering and panel data. Eng Comput2020; 37: 2999–3021.
18.
ZhaoEFWuCQ.Risk probabilistic assessment of ultrahigh arch dams through regression panel modeling on deformation behavior. Struct Control Health Monit2021; 28(5): 2716.
19.
LeiWWangJJiTY, et al. Dam deformation early warning model based on cluster analysis and spatiotemporal data fusion. Measurement2022; 204: 112109.
20.
LuTQGuHGuCS, et al. A multi-point dam deformation prediction model based on spatiotemporal graph convolutional network. Eng Appl Artif Intell2025; 149: 110483.
21.
YangGSunJZhangJW, et al. Research on temperature control index for high concrete dams based on information entropy and cloud model from the view of spatial field. Water2023; 15(22): 4023.
22.
ChenWLWangXLTongDW, et al. Dynamic early-warning model of dam deformation based on deep learning and fusion of spatiotemporal features. Knowl Based Syst2021; 233: 107537.
23.
ZhaoEFWuCQ.Unified egg ellipse critical threshold estimation for the deformation behavior of ultrahigh arch dams. Eng Struct2020; 214: 110598.
24.
YangG.Deformation similarity characteristics-considered hybrid panel model for multi-point deformation monitoring of super-high arch dams in operating conditions. Measurement2022; 192: 110908.
25.
YangJQSuHZLiuHC, et al. A multi-point combined prediction model for deformation monitoring of concrete dams. Eng Appl Artif Intell2025; 159: 111652.
26.
HuJMaFH.Comparison of hierarchical clustering based deformation prediction models for high arch dams during the initial operation period. J Civ Struct Health Monit2021; 11: 897–914.
27.
XuBChenZYWangX, et al. Combined prediction model of concrete arch dam displacement based on cluster analysis considering signal residual correction. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 203: 110721.
28.
CaoWHWenZPSuHZ.Spatiotemporal clustering analysis and zonal prediction model for deformation behavior of super-high arch dams. Expert Syst Appl2023; 216: 119439.
29.
WangSWXuCGuCS, et al. Displacement monitoring model of concrete dams using the shape feature clustering-based temperature principal component factor. Struct Control Health Monit2020; 27: 2603.
30.
HuJMaFH.Statistical modelling for high arch dam deformation during the initial impoundment period. Struct Control Health Monit2020; 27(12): e2638.
31.
XuXYYangJMaCH, et al. Segmented modeling method of dam displacement based on BEAST time series decomposition. Measurement2022; 202: 111811.
32.
LeiWWangJ.Dynamic stacking ensemble monitoring model of dam displacement based on the feature selection with PCA-RF. J Civ Struct Health Monit2022; 12(3): 557–578.
33.
YinCWuZY.Separate modeling technique for deformation monitoring of concrete dams. Struct Health Monit2022; 21: 2968–2989.
34.
HuJJiangHLiX.An optimized zonal deformation prediction model for super-high arch dams. Structures2023; 50: 758–774.
35.
Hariri-ArdebiliMAMahdaviGNussLK, et al. The role of artificial intelligence and digital technologies in dam engineering: narrative review and outlook. Eng Appl Artif Intell2023; 126: 106813.
36.
BeiranvandBRajaeeT.Application of artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models in predicting seepage and pore water pressure of dams: a state-of-the-art review. Adv Eng Softw2022; 173: 103268.
37.
LiuZYYuJQFengCY, et al. A hybrid forecasting method for cooling load in large public buildings based on improved long short term memory. J Build Eng2023; 76: 107238.
38.
ZhaoLQingSHBaiJY, et al. A hybrid optimized model for predicting evapotranspiration in early and late rice based on a categorical regression tree combination of key influencing factors. Comput Electron Agric2023; 211: 108031.
39.
FanXWangHZhuoZK, et al. A novel dung beetle optimization algorithm based on Lévy flight and triangle walk. Future Gener Comput Syst2025; 174: 108006.
40.
WangZDHuangLLYangSX, et al. A quasi-oppositional learning of updating quantum state and Q-learning based on the dung beetle algorithm for global optimization. Alexandria Eng J2023; 81: 469–488.
41.
CuiQQZhaoSJChenM, et al. Feature selection based on improved white shark optimizer. J Bionic Eng2024; 21: 3123–3150.
42.
LiuRLiGLWeiLS, et al. Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using machine learning methods with grey wolf and sparrow search algorithms. J Hydrol2022; 610: 127977.
43.
SuiXFWangJSZhangSH, et al. Multi-strategy fusion mayfly algorithm on task offloading and scheduling for IoT-based fog computing multi-tasks learning. Artif Intell Rev2025; 58: 10462.
44.
GuoWYWangYZhaoFQ, et al. Riesz fractional derivative elite-guided sine cosine algorithm. Appl Soft Comput2019; 81: 105481.
45.
LongWJiaoJJLiangXM, et al. Parameters estimation of photovoltaic models using a novel hybrid seagull optimization algorithm. Energy2022; 249: 123760.
46.
LongWJiaoHYangY, et al. Planar-mirror reflection imaging learning based seagull optimization algorithm for global optimization and feature selection. Knowl Based Syst2025; 317: 113420.
47.
DehghaniMMontazeriZTrojovskáE, et al. Coati optimization algorithm: a new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl Based Syst2023; 259: 110011.
48.
YanZPZhangJZZengJ, et al. Nature-inspired approach: an enhanced whale optimization algorithm for global optimization. Math Comput Simul2021; 185: 17–46.
49.
SunZMaSNJianYB, et al. Cold chain delivery route modeling and optimizing based on the clustered Whale Optimization Algorithm. Appl Soft Comput2025; 182: 113544.
50.
KhatriAGabaARanaKPS, et al. A novel life choice-based optimizer. Soft Comput2019; 24: 9121–9141.
51.
HashimFAHousseinEHHussainK, et al. Honey Badger Algorithm: new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Math Comput Simul2022; 192: 84–110.
52.
SahooSKHousseinEHPremkumarM, et al. Self-adaptive moth flame optimizer combined with crossover operator and Fibonacci search strategy for COVID-19 CT image segmentation. Expert Syst Appl2023; 227: 120367.
53.
AcharyaDSMishraSK.A multi-agent based symbiotic organisms search algorithm for tuning fractional order PID controller. Measurement2020; 155: 107559.
54.
ZhuXHWangN.Hairpin RNA genetic algorithm based ANFIS for modeling overhead cranes. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 165: 108326.
55.
YangGLuanBWSunJ, et al. Sparrow search mechanism-based effective feature mining algorithm for the broken wire signal detection of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 212: 111270.
56.
WeiLSZhangQYangBB.Improved biogeography-based optimization algorithm based on hybrid migration and dual-mode mutation strategy. Fractal Fract2022; 6(10): 597.
57.
YangYWLiZXChenJ, et al. TRELM-DROP: an impavement non-iterative algorithm for traffic flow forecast. Physica A2024; 633: 129337.
58.
WolpertDHMacreadyWG.No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput1997; 1: 67–82.
59.
WeiBWLeiZXYuanDY.Optimized deformation monitoring models of concrete dam considering the uncertainty of upstream and downstream surface temperatures. Eng Struct2023; 288: 115950.
60.
ChenSYGuCSLinCN, et al. Multi-kernel optimized relevance vector machine for probabilistic prediction of concrete dam displacement. Eng Comput2021; 37(3): 1943–1959.
61.
ZhaoEFWuCQ.Centroid deformation-based nonlinear safety monitoring model for arch dam performance evaluation. Eng Struct2021; 243: 112652.
62.
PurohitSKPanigrahiS.Novel deterministic and probabilistic forecasting methods for crude oil price employing optimized deep learning, statistical and hybrid models. Inform Sci2024; 658: 120021.
63.
YangGGuHChenXD, et al. Hybrid hydraulic-seasonal-time model for predicting the deformation behaviour of high concrete dams during the operational period. Struct Control Health Monit2021; 28(3): e2685.
64.
IssouaniEMBertailPGautheratE.Exponential bounds for regularized Hotelling’s T2 statistic in high dimension. J Multivariate Anal2024; 203: 105342.
65.
ImranMDaiHLZaidiFS, et al. Incorporating principal component analysis into Hotelling T2 control chart for compositional data monitoring. Comput Ind Eng2023; 186: 109755.
66.
HuJWuSH.Statistical modeling for deformation analysis of concrete arch dams with influential horizontal cracks. Struct Health Monit2018; 18: 546–562.
67.
XuBLuWGLiZC, et al. Order typical small probability diagnosis method of concrete dam crack behavior abnormality. SST2014; 44: 1035–1042.
68.
RongGXuLDYuS, et al. The mechanism of large-scale river valley deformation induced by impoundment at the Baihetan Hydropower Station. Comput Geotech2024; 165: 105898.
69.
ShaoCFZhaoEFXuYX, et al. Genesis analysis of special deformation characteristics for super-high arch dams in the alpine and gorge regions of Southwest China. Mathematics2023; 11(7): 1753.
70.
LiMWZhouZFZhuangC, et al. Deformation mechanism and model of river valley contraction of the Xiluodu reservoir, China. Environ Earth Sci2022; 81: 491.
71.
LinPXiangYFLiZC, et al. Reinforcement mechanism and design method for geological defects in arch dam abutments. Rock Mech Rock Eng2025. DOI: 10.1007/S00603-025-04861-6.
72.
HanMSChenKFengYL, et al. Cross-scale refined analysis and reinforcement design for the rigid-flexible mixed region in hybrid dams. Comput Geotech2024; 176: 106727.
73.
PengJZouDGQuDQ, et al. Study on the seismic behaviour evolution and berm reinforcement mechanism of high rockfill dam on deep liquefiable overburden. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng2026; 201: 109955.
