Intelligent perception and early warning for deterioration of prestressed concrete box-girder bridges via the variation mining of mapping from vehicle load to structural displacement
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Intelligent perception and early warning for deterioration of prestressed concrete box-girder bridges via the variation mining of mapping from vehicle load to structural displacement
Perception and early warning for state deterioration of in-service bridges under complex traffic flows is an important task to ensure the efficient operation of urban transportation lifelines. Variation hiding in the fuzzy mapping from structural input (load) to output (response) can reflect and quantify the state deterioration of bridges. Using a prestressed concrete box-girder bridge as a case study, this paper proposes an intelligent perception and early warning method of state deterioration via the variation mining of digital mapping from vehicle load to structural displacement. First, the load and response signals belonging to each passing vehicle are automatically extracted according to the probabilistic distribution characteristics of the vehicle weight and displacement. Second, Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering and Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) sampling are employed to reconstruct load and displacement with different sampling frequencies, enabling precise matching between vehicle load and structural displacement. Third, Bayesian linear regression (BLR) is used to establish a dynamic piecewise linear model of vehicle load-displacement scatters, which reflects time-varying digital mapping between vehicle load and displacement. Finally, a two-level early warning framework using control charts and hypothesis testing is proposed based on the slope variation of the piecewise linear model. The results show that the method can perceive the performance variation of the bridge during service and realize the early warning of state deterioration in different time scales.
BaoYChenZWeiS, et al. The state of the art of data science and engineering in structural health monitoring. Engineering2019; 5(2): 234–242.
2.
XuY-L. Making good use of structural health monitoring systems of long-span cable-supported bridges. J Civ Struct Health Monit2018; 8(3): 477–497.
3.
KhanSMAtamturkturSChowdhuryM, et al. Integration of structural health monitoring and intelligent transportation systems for bridge condition assessment: current status and future direction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2016; 17(8): 2107–2122.
4.
ZhangXDingYZhaoH, et al. Long-term bridge performance assessment using clustering and Bayesian linear regression for vehicle load and strain mapping model. Struct Control Health Monit2022; 29(12).
5.
ZhangXDingYZhaoH, et al. Mixed skewness probability modeling and extreme value predicting for physical system input–output based on full bayesian generalized maximum-likelihood estimation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2024; 73: 1–16.
6.
KhanMSCapraniCGhoshS, et al. Value of strain-based structural health monitoring as decision support for heavy load access to bridges. Struct Infrastruct Eng2022; 18(4): 521–536.
7.
LiRMoTYangJ, et al. Ontologies-based domain knowledge modeling and heterogeneous sensor data integration for bridge health monitoring systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf2021; 17(1): 321–332.
8.
BabaSKondohJ. Damage evaluation of fixed beams at both ends for bridge health monitoring using a combination of a vibration sensor and a surface acoustic wave device. Eng Struct2022; 262: 114323.
9.
ZhouYXiaYChenB, et al. Analytical solution to temperature-induced deformation of suspension bridges. Mech Syst Sig Process2020; 139: 106568.
10.
ZhaoHDingYLiA, et al. State-monitoring for abnormal vibration of bridge cables focusing on non-stationary responses: from knowledge in phenomena to digital indicators. Measurement2022; 205: 112148.
11.
HuangH-BYiT-HLiH-N, et al. Strain-based performance warning method for bridge main girders under variable operating conditions. J Bridge Eng2020; 25(4): 04020013.
12.
GaoFChenPXiaY, et al. Efficient calculation and monitoring of temperature actions on supertall structures. Eng. Struct. 2019; 193: 1–11.
13.
JiangHWanCYangK, et al. Modeling relationships for field strain data under thermal effects using functional data analysis. Measurement2021; 177: 109279.
14.
YangKDingYSunP, et al. Modeling of temperature time-lag effect for concrete box-girder bridges. Appl Sci2019; 9(16): 3255.
15.
ZhouYLiZHuJ, et al. Research on contactless bridge weigh-in-motion based on Bayesian theory. J Earthquake Eng Eng Vibr2023; 43(1): 43–54.
16.
ZhaoHTanCObrienEJ, et al. Developing digital twins to characterize bridge behavior using measurements taken under random traffic. J Bridge Eng2022; 27(1): 04021101.
17.
DanDKongZ. Bridge vehicle-induced effect influence line characteristic function based on monitoring big data: definition and identification. Struct Health Monit2022; 22(5): 2987–3005.
18.
ZhouYPeiYZhouS, et al. Novel methodology for identifying the weight of moving vehicles on bridges using structural response pattern extraction and deep learning algorithms. Measurement2021; 168: 108384.
19.
GuoTLiAZhaoD. Multiple-peaked probabilistic vehicle load model for highway bridge reliability assessment. J Southeast Univ2008; 38(5): 763–766.
20.
ChenZBaoYChenJ, et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of heavy vehicle loads on long-span bridges based on undirected graphical model. Struct Infrastruct Eng2019; 15(11): 1485–1499.
21.
KimJSongJ. Bayesian updating methodology for probabilistic model of bridge traffic loads using in-service data of traffic environment. Struct Infrastruct Eng2023; 19(1): 77–92.
22.
CapraniCCObrienEJMcLachlanG.J. Characteristic traffic load effects from a mixture of loading events on short to medium span bridges. Struct Saf2008; 30(5): 394–404.
23.
LeahyCObrienEO’ConnorA. The effect of traffic growth on characteristic bridge load effects. Transport Res Procedia2016; 14: 3990–3999.
24.
DongC-ZCelikOCatbasFN, et al. Structural displacement monitoring using deep learning-based full field optical flow methods. Struct Infrastruct Eng2020; 16(1): 51–71.
25.
ZhaoHDingYLiA, et al. Digital modeling on the nonlinear mapping between multi-source monitoring data of in-service bridges. Struct Control Health Monit2020; 27(11): e2618.
26.
ZhangRChenZChenS, et al. Deep long short-term memory networks for nonlinear structural seismic response prediction. Comput Struct2019; 220: 55–68.
27.
ObrienEJEnrightB. Using weigh-in-motion data to determine aggressiveness of traffic for bridge loading. J Bridge Eng2013; 18(3): 232–239.
28.
ZhaoHDingYLiA, et al. Live-load strain evaluation of the prestressed concrete box-girder bridge using deep learning and clustering. Struct Health Monit2020; 19(4): 1051–1063.
29.
LiHWangTWuG. A Bayesian deep learning approach for random vibration analysis of bridges subjected to vehicle dynamic interaction. Mech Syst Sig Process2022; 170: 108799.
30.
KimSLeeJPark, et al. Vehicle signal analysis using artificial neural networks for a bridge weigh-in-motion system. Sensors2009; 9(10): 7943–7956.
31.
WuR-TJahanshahiMR. Deep convolutional neural network for structural dynamic response estimation and system identification. J Eng Mech2019; 145(1): 04018125.
32.
ZhaoHDingYMengL, et al. Bayesian multiple linear regression and new modeling paradigm for structural deflection robust to data time lag and abnormal signal. IEEE Sens J. 2023; 23(17): 19635–19647.
33.
GeLDanDKooKY, et al. An improved system for long-term monitoring of full-bridge traffic load distribution on long-span bridges. Structures2023; 54: 1076–1089.
34.
DanDYingYGeL. Digital twin system of bridges group based on machine vision fusion monitoring of bridge traffic load. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(11): 22190–22205.
35.
HouRJeongSLynchJP, et al. Cyber-physical system architecture for automating the mapping of truck loads to bridge behavior using computer vision in connected highway corridors. Transp Res Part C: Emerging Technol2020; 111: 547–571.
36.
ZhouYZhouSPeiY, et al. A non-contact identification of bridge influence line based on big data using interval analysis and affine algorithm. J Earthquake Eng Eng Vibr2020; 40(3): 20–31.
37.
LiYDingYZhaoH, et al. Data-driven structural condition assessment for high-speed railway bridges using multi-band FIR filtering and clustering. Structures2022; 41: 1546–1558.
38.
LiYWuXHuangC, et al. Calculation of transverse load distribution coefficient of assembled girder bridge considering main girder damage. J Rail Way Sci Eng2019; 16(6): 1459–1465.
39.
Ministry of Housing Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. I.Q.o.t.P.s.R.o.C.: Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015 (in Chinese).
40.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. Beijing, China: People’s Transportation Press, 2018 (in Chinese).
41.
MetropolisNRosenbluthAWRosenbluthMN, et al. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys1953; 21(6): 1087–1092.
42.
LiK-FLiuW-NMarkineV, et al. Analytical study on the dynamic displacement response of a curved track subjected to moving loads. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A2013; 14(12): 867–879.
43.
KasuyaE. Mann-Whitney U test when variances are unequal. Anim Behav2001; 61: 1247–1249.
