Damage identification of a jacket platform based on a hybrid deep learning framework

Abstract

Given the complex operational environment of offshore platforms, accurate identification of structural damage has become a crucial aspect of structural health monitoring. However, accurately pinpointing the damage locations based on vibration data under load, particularly for intricate platform structures, is a challenging task. Existing damage-identification methods, particularly those rooted in deep learning frameworks, often encounter difficulties when applied to marine platforms. Therefore, this study proposes an innovative approach. The accuracy of damage identification for marine platforms operating under unique service conditions was enhanced by introducing a deconvolutional parallel processing module and an auxiliary loss function processing module into the core ResNet50 network. This enhancement improved the accuracy of the model in detecting damage within complex marine structures. Information processing is enriched by fusing the vibration data acquired from the measurement points across different domains: time, frequency, and recurrence plots. The results of this approach were remarkable. When the algorithm model, validated through model experiments, is extended to a digital twin established based on real marine platforms, simulations and loading under real loads were performed on a refined high-fidelity finite-element model, yielding dynamic response information that closely mirrored real-world conditions. A corresponding damage-recognition database was established to support the digital twin system. For the eight different directions, the model accuracy ranged from a minimum of 87.38% to a maximum of 92.27%. This represents a significant advancement compared to the performance of the original network. Empirical experiments substantiated the efficacy of the improved algorithm, demonstrating an impressive recognition accuracy of 93.75%. This achievement underscores the potential of this method to revolutionize damage identification for marine platforms, particularly under the distinctive conditions that these structures encounter. The integration of specialized modules and enhanced processing methodologies further bolster the accuracy of deep-learning-based damage identification and makes the building of digital twin models of offshore platforms feasible.

Keywords

Data fusion deep learning damage identification jacket platform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hou

Xia

. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019. J Sound Vibr 2021; 491: 115741.

Wilde

Rucka

. Damage location in beam and plate structures by wavelet analysis of experimentally determined mode shapes. Key Eng Mater 2005; 293–294: 313–320.

López-Díez

Torrealba

Guemes

, et al. Application of Statistical Energy Analysis for Damage Detection in Spacecraft Structures. Key Engineering Materials 2005; 293–294: 525–532.

Yang

Peng

, et al. Structural damage localization by the principal Eigenvector of modal flexibility change. Algorithms 2016; 9: 24.

Shih

Thambiratnam

Chan

THT

. Damage detection in slab-on-girder bridges using vibration characteristics: damage detection in slab-on-girder bridges. Struct Control Health Monit 2013; 20(10): 1271–1290.

Viefhues

Döhler

Hille

, et al. Statistical subspace-based damage detection with estimated reference. Mech Syst Signal Process 2022; 164: 108241.

Monajemi

Razak

Ismail

. Damage detection in frame structures using damage locating vectors. Measurement 2013; 46(9): 3541–3548.

Garcia

Osegueda

. Damage detection using ARMA model coefficients. Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1999.

Yam

Yan

Wei

Vibration-based non destructive structural damage detection. Key Eng Mater 2004; 270–273: 1446–1453.

10.

Wang

Chen

Zhao

, et al. Damage detection in circular cylindrical shells by frequency sensitivities and mode shapes. Key Eng Mater 2005; 293–294: 565–574.

11.

Rodríguez

Yarza

López-Díez

, et al. Damage detection on typical aeronautical structures. Key Eng Mater 2005; 293–294: 677–684.

12.

Maia

NMM

Ribeiro

AMR

Fontul

, et al. Using the detection and relative damage quantification indicator (DRQ) with transmissibility. Key Eng Mater 2007; 347: 455–460.

13.

Sim

Spencer

Nagayama

, et al. Multimetric sensing for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 2011; 137(1): 22–30.

14.

Liu

, et al. Initial damage detection based on elastic modulus randomness. Key Eng Mater 2006; 324–325: 109–112.

15.

Fallahian

Ahmadi

Khoshnoudian

. A structural damage detection algorithm based on discrete wavelet transform and ensemble pattern recognition models. J Civil Struct Health Monit 2022; 12(2): 323–338.

16.

Zhang

Chen

, et al. A framework of structural damage detection for civil structures using a combined multi-scale convolutional neural network and echo state network. Eng Comput 2022; 39: 1771–1789.

17.

Wang

Cha

. Unsupervised deep learning approach using a deep auto-encoder with a one-class support vector machine to detect damage. Struct Health Monit 2021; 20(1): 406–425.

18.

Yang

Ren

. Selection of optimal threshold to construct recurrence plot for structural operational vibration measurements. J Sound Vibr 2015; 349: 361–374.

19.

Shang

Sun

Xia

, et al. Vibration-based damage detection for bridges by deep convolutional denoising autoencoder. Struct Health Monit 2021; 20: 1880–1903.

20.

Andrushia

Anand

Mary Neebha

, et al. Autonomous detection of concrete damage under fire conditions. Autom Constr 2022; 140: 104364.

21.

Flah

Ragab

Lazhari

, et al. Localization and classification of structural damage using deep learning single-channel signal-based measurement. Autom Constr 2022; 139: 104271.

22.

Yang

Zhou

, et al. A data-driven structural damage detection framework based on parallel convolutional neural network and bidirectional gated recurrent unit. Inf Sci 2021; 566: 103–117.

23.

Sizyakin

Voronin

Gapon

, et al. A deep learning approach to crack detection on road surfaces. In: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Defense Applications II, Online, 2020. SPIE.

24.

Cha

Choi

Suh

, et al. Autonomous structural visual inspection using region-based deep learning for detecting multiple damage types. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 2018; 33(9): 731–747.

25.

Liu

Zhang

. Deep learning based crack damage detection technique for thin plate structures using guided lamb wave signals. Smart Mater Struct 2020; 29(1): 15032.

26.

Cha

Choi

Büyüköztürk

, et al. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 2017; 32(5): 361–378.

27.

Liang

Lei

, et al. SCueU-Net: efficient damage detection method for railway rail. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 125109–125120.

28.

Jia

, et al. Crack identification for marine engineering equipment based on improved SSD and YOLOv5. Ocean Eng 2023; 268: 113534.

29.

Zhang

Qiu

, et al. A new road damage detection baseline with attention learning. Appl Sci 2022; 12(15): 7594.

30.

Jia

, et al. Image-based crack detection method for FPSO module support. Buildings 2022; 12(8): 1147.

31.

Jiang

Pang

. A deep learning approach for fast detection and classification of concrete damage. Autom Constr 2021; 128: 103785.

32.

Nam

Kang

. Classification of chaotic signals of the recurrence matrix using a convolutional neural network and verification through the Lyapunov Exponent. Appl Sci 2021; 11(1): 77.

33.

Nam

Kang

. Comparison of vibration visualization methods for classification of chaos based on CNN. J Mech Sci Technol 2022; 36(6): 2749–2757.

34.

Liang

Ren

W-X

, et al. Structural damage identification under nonstationary excitations through recurrence plot and multi-label convolutional neural network. Measurement 2021; 186: 110101.