This article reports on the characteristics of fracture process zone in steel fibre-reinforced concrete (SFRC) under the mode I fracture process using acoustic emission (AE) testing. The generated AE waveforms during mode I fracture process in SFRC were recorded in the laboratory. Using a statistical analysis of AE waveforms, it was observed that as the loading increases, a damage zone consisting of numerous microcracks develops ahead of the predefined notch tip. The location of the generated AE events related to the numerous microcracks were classified into three zones namely (i) major damage, (ii) moderate damage and (iii) low damage. The areas of these regions were evaluated from the distribution of the AE events around the pre-notch. The number of AE events reduced with the increase in the steel fibre content under the same experimental conditions. The major damage zone was located ahead of the notch tip very closely and it comprised of AE events with (i) high peak amplitude, (ii) low information entropy and (iii) longer AE waveform duration.
BolanderJEChoiSDuddukuriSR. Fracture of fiber-reinforced cement composites: effects of fiber dispersion. Int J Fract2008; 154: 73–86.
2.
ShahSP. Fracture toughness of cement-based materials. In: ShahSPSwartzSE (eds) Fracture of concrete and rock. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1989, pp. 1–12.
3.
BhosaleABPrakashSS. Crack propagation analysis of synthetic vs. steel vs. hybrid fibre-reinforced concrete beams using digital image correlation technique. Int J Concr Struct Mater2020; 14: 57.
4.
VandewalleLNemegeerDBalazsGL, et al. Rilem TC 162-TDF: Test and design methods for steel fibre reinforced concrete: uni-axial tension test for steel fibre reinforced concrete. Mater Struct Constr2001; 34: 3–6.
5.
OhtsuM. Acoustic emission (AE) and related non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques in the fracture mechanics of concrete: fundamentals and applications. 2020. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
6.
WecharatanaMShahSP. A model for predicting fracture resistance of fiber reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Res1983; 13: 819–829.
7.
JenqYShahSP. Two parameter fracture model for concrete. J Eng Mech1985; 111: 1227–1241.
8.
KazemiMTGolsorkhtabarHBeygiMHA, et al. Fracture properties of steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete using work of fracture and size effect methods. Constr Build Mater2017; 142: 482–489.
9.
RukavinaTIbrahimbegovicAKozarI. Fiber-reinforced brittle material fracture models capable of capturing a complete set of failure modes including fiber pull-out. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2019; 355: 157–192.
10.
ZhangJLiuXWuZ, et al. Fracture properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete: size effect study via mesoscale modelling approach. Eng Fract Mech2022; 260: 108193.
11.
QinSGaoDWangZ, et al. Research on the fracture behavior of steel-fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete. Materials (Basel)2022; 15: 135.
12.
LiGRenZYuJ. Mixed-mode I-II fracture process zone characteristic of the four-point shearing concrete beam. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 3203.
13.
LacidognaGPianaGAccorneroF, et al. Multi-technique damage monitoring of concrete beams: acoustic emission, digital image correlation, dynamic identification. Constr Build Mater2020; 242: 118114.
14.
AguilarJVJuárez-AlvaradoCAMendoza-RangelJM, et al. Effect of the notch-to-depth ratio on the post-cracking behavior of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 1–17.
15.
RaoGRaoA. Toughness indices of fiber reinforced concrete subjected to mode II loading. In: OhBH (ed.) Recent advances in fracture mechanics of concrete. 2010, pp. 112–117. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Concrete Institute.
16.
ShahZLSP. Localization of microcracking in concrete under uniaxial tension. ACI Mater J; 91: 372–381.
17.
OtsukaKDateH. Fracture process zone in concrete tension specimen. Eng Fract Mech2000; 65: 111–131.
18.
LiZ. Microcrack characterization in concrete under uniaxial tension. Mag Concr Res1996; 48: 219–228.
19.
EnokiMInabaHMizutaniY, et al. The Japanese society for non-destructive inspection. Practical acoustic emission testing. 2016. Japan: Springer Nature.
20.
LemaitreJ. A course on damage mechanics. 1996. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
21.
AccorneroFRubinoACarpinteriA. Ductile-to-brittle transition in fibre-reinforced concrete beams: scale and fibre volume fraction effects. Mater Des Process Commun2020; 2: 1–11.
22.
AccorneroFRubinoACarpinteriA. Post-cracking regimes in the flexural behaviour of fibre-reinforced concrete beams. Int J Solids Struct2022; 248: 111637.
23.
FantilliAPMihashiHValliniP. Multiple cracking and strain hardening in fiber-reinforced concrete under uniaxial tension. Cem Concr Res2009; 39: 1217–1229.
24.
GrosseCUOhtsuM. Acoustic emission testing: basics for research-applications in civil engineering. 2008. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
25.
LandisENWhittakerDB. Acoustic emissions and the fracture energy of wood. In: Proceedings of the engineering mechanics conference, Svratka, Czech Republic, 15–18 May 2000.
26.
LandisENBaillonL. Experiments to relate acoustic emission energy to fracture energy of concrete. J Eng Mech2002; 128: 698–702.
27.
PollockAA. AE singal features: energy, signal strength, absolute energy and RMS. Tech notes TN-103-22-9/11. Princeton junction, NJ: Mistras Group, Inc.
CarpinteriALacidognaGCorradoM, et al. Cracking and crackling in concrete-like materials: a dynamic energy balance. Eng Fract Mech2016; 155: 130–144.
30.
TayfurSAlverNAbdiS, et al. Characterization of concrete matrix/steel fiber de-bonding in an SFRC beam: principal component analysis and k-mean algorithm for clustering AE data. Eng Fract Mech2018; 194: 73–85.
31.
ShannonCE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J1948; 27: 379–423.
32.
ChaiMZhangZDuanQ. A new qualitative acoustic emission parameter based on Shannon’s entropy for damage monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 100: 617–629.
33.
D’AngelaDErcolinoM. Acoustic emission entropy: an innovative approach for structural health monitoring of fracture-critical metallic components subjected to fatigue loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2021; 44: 1041–1058.
34.
BaróJCorralÁIllaX, et al. Statistical similarity between the compression of a porous material and earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett2013; 110: 088702.
35.
ColomboISMainIGFordeMC. Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using “b-value” analysis of acoustic emission signals. J Mater Civ Eng2003; 15: 280–286.
36.
KunduTJangHSChaYH, et al. A simple model to predict the effect of volume fraction, diameter, and length of fibres on strength of fibre reinforced brittle matrix composites. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2000; 24: 655–673.
