The current renewable energy market forces hydraulic turbines to operate for longer periods of time at off-design and transient conditions. Their life expectancy is then decreased due to the wear provoked by flow instabilities and stochastic flow excitations. This study presents an experimental investigation into the fatigue damage induced on the runner blades of a Kaplan turbine model when working at speed-no-load (SNL), part load (PL) and during ramps of load. The unit was equipped with on-board sensors on the blades and the shaft as well as with off-board sensors installed on the supporting structure and the draft tube cone. The results reveal that operation at SNL induces more fatigue damage on the runner blades than at PL. The damage is then mainly induced by stochastic flow excitations at SNL and by the rotating mode of the rotating vortex rope (RVR) at PL. The ramps of load, when crossing each operating condition, cause levels of damage similar to those found in stationary operation. Finally, it was proved that the blade fatigue damage can be estimated from on-board shaft measurements at any condition. However, the blade fatigue damage can only be estimated using off-board measurements when the RVR is fully developed at PL.
GaudardLRomerioF. The future of hydropower in Europe: interconnecting climate, markets, and policies. Environ Sci Policy2014; 37: 172–181.
2.
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) Secretariat. Hydropower: Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series, Volume 1: Power Sector, Issue 3/5. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IRENA, 2012.
3.
TrivediC. Investigations of transient pressure loading on a high head Francis turbine. Doctoral Thesis, Luleå Tekniska Universitet, Luleå, 2015.
4.
TrivediCCervantesMJGandhiBK, et al. Pressure measurements on a high-head Francis turbine during load acceptance and rejection. J Hydraul Res2014; 52: 283–297.
5.
TrivediCGandhiBKCervantesMJ. Effect of transients on Francis turbine runner life: a review. J Hydraul Res2013; 51: 121–32.
6.
ButcherCJReddyBV. Second law analysis of a waste heat recovery based power generation system. Int J Heat Mass Transf2007; 50: 2355–2363.
7.
GoyalRGandhiBKCervantesMJ. PIV measurements in Francis turbine: a review and application to transient operations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 81: 2976–2991.
8.
BakkenBHBjorkvollT. Hydropower unit start-up costs. In: IEEE power engineering society summer meeting 2002, Chicago, IL, USA, 21–25 July 2002. New York, NY: IEEE.
9.
NilssonOSjelvgrenD. Hydro unit start-up costs and their impact on the short term scheduling strategies of Swedish power producers. IEEE Trans Power Syst1997; 12: 38–44.
10.
HuangXChamberland-LauzonJOramC, et al. Fatigue analyses of the prototype Francis runners based on site measurements and simulations. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2014; 22: 012014.
11.
AmiriKMuluBRaiseeM, et al. Unsteady pressure measurements on the runner of a Kaplan turbine during load acceptance and load rejection. J Hydraul Res2015; 54: 56–73.
12.
GoyalRCervantesMJGandhiBK. Vortex rope formation in a high head model Francis turbine. J Fluids Eng2017; 139(4): 041102.
13.
FavrelAMüllerALandryC, et al. Study of the vortex induced pressure excitation source in a Francis turbine draft tube by particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluid2015; 56: 215.
14.
CiocanGDIliescuMSVuTC. Experimental study and numerical simulation of the FLINDT draft tube rotating vortex. J Fluids Eng2007; 129(2): 146–158.
15.
GoyalRGandhiBKCervantesMJ. Experimental study of mitigation of a spiral vortex breakdown at high Reynolds number under an adverse pressure gradient. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 104104.
16.
KumarSKhullarSGoyalR, et al. Experimental investigation of a draft tube flow field in a Francis turbine during part load operation. In: Proceedings of the 7th international and 45th national fluid mechanics and fluid power conference (FMFP), IIT Bombay, 2018, Mumbai, India, 10–12 December 2018, p.348.
17.
TrivediCGogstadPJDahlhaugOG. Investigation of the unsteady pressure pulsation in the prototype Francis turbines—Part 1: Steady state operating conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 108: 188–202.
18.
NishiMKubotaTMatsunagaS. Study on swirl flow and surge in an elbow type draft tube. In: Proceedings of the 10th IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and cavitation, Tokyo, Japan, 1980.
19.
ShiQ. Experimental investigation of frequency characteristics of draft tube pressure pulsations for Francis turbines. In: Proceedings of the XVIII IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and cavitation, Valencia, Spain, 1996, vol. 1, pp.935–944.
20.
CoutuAMonetteCNennemannB, et al. Specific speed effect on Francis runner reliability under various operating conditions. In: Proceedings of the XXXVII Iberian Latin American Congress on computational methods in engineering, Brasilia, Brazil, 2016.
21.
SeidelUMendeCHübnerB, et al. Dynamic loads in Francis runners and their impact on fatigue life. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2014; 22: 032054.
22.
CoutuAChamberland-LauzonJ. The impact of flexible operation on Francis runners. Int J Hydropower Dams2015; 22(2).
23.
NennemannBMorissetteJ-FChamberland-LauzonJ, et al. Challenges in dynamic pressure and stress predictions at no-load operation in hydraulic turbines. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2014; 22: 032055.
24.
MelotMMonetteCCoutuA, et al. A new Francis runner design procedure to predict static stresses at speed-no-load operation. Int J Hydropower Dams2014; 21(1).
25.
MorissetteJFNicolleJ. Fluid-structure simulations of the stochastic behaviour of Francis turbine during startup. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2019; 240: 022026.
26.
SeidelUHübnerBLöffladJ, et al. Evaluation of RSI-induced stresses in Francis runners. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2012; 15: 052010.
27.
MorissetteJFChamberland-LauzonJNennemannB, et al. Stress predictions in a Francis turbine at no-load operating regime. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2016; 49(7): 072016.
28.
BouajilaSDe ColombelTLowysP-Y, et al. Hydraulic phenomena frequency signature of Francis turbines operating in part load conditions. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2016; 49(8): 082001.
29.
TrivediCDahlhaugOG. Interaction between trailing edge wake and vortex rings in a Francis turbine at runaway condition: compressible large eddy simulation. Phys Fluids2018; 30: 075101.
30.
TrivediCCervantesMJGandhiBK, et al. Transient pressure measurements on a high head model Francis turbine during emergency shutdown, total load rejection, and runaway. J Fluids Eng2014; 136(12): 121107–121118.
31.
MagnoliMVAncigerDMaiwaldM. Numerical and experimental investigation of the runner channel vortex in Francis turbines regarding its dynamic flow characteristics and its influence on pressure oscillations. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2019; 240(2): 022044.
32.
YamamotoKMüllerAFavrelA, et al. Flow characteristics and influence associated with inter-blade cavitation vortices at deep part load operations of a Francis turbine. J Phys Conf Ser2017; 813: 012029.
33.
YamamotoKMüllerAFavrelA, et al. Experimental evidence of inter-blade cavitation vortex development in Francis turbines at deep part load condition. Exp Fluids2017; 58: 142.
34.
PůlpitelLSkotákAKoutnikJ. Vortices rotating in the vaneless space of a Kaplan turbine operating under off-cam high swirl flow conditions. In: CabreraEEspertVMartínezF (eds.) Hydraulic machinery and cavitation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 1996, pp.925–934.
35.
SkotakA. Modelling of the swirl flow in a Kaplan turbine operating under off-cam conditions. In: Aqua-Media international, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996, pp.197–204.
36.
HoudeSDumasGDeschênesC. Experimental and numerical investigations on the origins of rotating stall in a propeller turbine runner operating in no-load conditions. J Fluids Eng2018; 140(11): 111104.
37.
NennemannBMelotMMonetteC, et al. Shear and vortex instabilities at deep part load of hydraulic turbines and their numerical prediction. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2021; 774: 012114.
38.
TrivediCGogstadPJDahlhaugOG. Investigation of unsteady pressure pulsations in the prototype Francis turbines during load variation and startup. J Renew Sustain Energy2017; 9(6): 064502.
39.
MonetteCMarmontHChamberland-LauzonJ, et al. Cost of enlarged operating zone for an existing Francis runner. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2016; 49: 072018.
40.
LöffladJEissnerMGrafB. Strain gauge measurements of rotating parts with telemetry. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on hydraulic efficiency measurements, Trondheim, Norway, 2012.
41.
DuparchyFBrammerJThibaudM, et al. Mechanical impact of dynamic phenomena in Francis turbines at off design conditions. J Phys Conf Ser2017; 813: 012035.
42.
PhamQHGagnonMAntoniJ, et al. A proposal for the dynamic strain interpolation on a hydroelectric turbine runner. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2021; 774: 012083.
43.
PhamQHGagnonMAntoniJ, et al. Prediction of hydroelectric turbine runner strain signal via cyclostationary decomposition and Kriging interpolation. Renew Energy2022; 182: 998–1011.
44.
DiagneIGagnonMTahanA. Modelling the dynamic behavior of turbine runner blades during transients using indirect measurements. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2016; 49: 072014.
45.
PresasAValentinDZhaoW, et al. Strain prediction in Francis runner by means of stationary sensors. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2021; 774: 012084.
46.
AynetoX. Fatiga de componentes y estructuras. Diseño, desarrollo y diagnosis. 1986, p.256.
RoigRSánchez-BotelloXEscalerX, et al. On the rotating vortex rope and its induced structural response in a Kaplan turbine model. Energies2022; 15: 6311.
