Looseness monitoring of multiple M1 bolt joints using multivariate intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and Lorentz signal-enhanced piezoelectric active sensing
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2022
Looseness monitoring of multiple M1 bolt joints using multivariate intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and Lorentz signal-enhanced piezoelectric active sensing
Bolts are widely used in the fields of mechanical, civil, and aerospace engineering. The condition of bolt joints has a significant impact on the safe and reliable operation of the whole equipment. The failure of bolt joints monitoring leads to severe accidents or even casualties. This paper proposes a novel bolt joints monitoring method using multivariate intrinsic multiscale entropy (MIME) analysis and Lorentz signal-enhanced piezoelectric active sensing. Lorentz signal is used as excitation signal in piezoelectric active sensing to expose nonlinear dynamical characteristics of the bolt joints. Multivariate variational mode decomposition (MVMD) is employed to decompose multiple components of the collected Lorentz signal into multivariate band-limited intrinsic mode functions (BLIMFs). Afterward, improved multiscale sample entropy (IMSE) values of each channel’s BLIMFs are computed to measure its irregularity and complexity. IMSE values are taken as quantitative features, reflecting dynamical characteristics of bolt joints. Further, the constructed 3-layer feature matrices are adopted as the input of the convolutional neural network (CNN) to achieve accurate bolt joint monitoring. The multiple M1 bolt joints are used during the experiment to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed approach. The results demonstrate the proposed novel approach is promising in bolt joints monitoring.
ZhangZ.LiuM.SuZ., et al. Quantitative evaluation of residual torque of a loose bolt based on wave energy dissipation and vibro-acoustic modulation: A comparative study. J Sound Vibration2016; 383: 156–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.001.
2.
YinT.JiangQ. H.YuenK. V.Vibration-based damage detection for structural connections using incomplete modal data by Bayesian approach and model reduction technique. Eng Structures2017; 132: 260–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.035.
3.
NaW. S.Bolt loosening detection using impedance based non-destructive method and probabilistic neural network technique with minimal training data. Eng Structures2021; 226: 111228. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111228.
4.
FanS.LiW.KongQ., et al. Monitoring of pin connection loosening using electromechanical impedance: Numerical simulation with experimental verification. J Intell Mater Syst Structures2018; 29(9): 1964–1973. DOI: 10.1177/1045389x18754354.
5.
WangF.HoS. C. M.SongG.Modeling and analysis of an impact-acoustic method for bolt looseness identification. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 133: 106249. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106249.
6.
ZhangY.LiD.ZhengX.Detection and location of bolt group looseness using ultrasonic guided wave. Smart Structures Syst2019; 24(3): 293–301.
7.
WangF.HoS. C. M.SongG.Monitoring of early looseness of multi-bolt connection: a new entropy-based active sensing method without saturation. Smart Mater Structures2019; 28(10): 10LT01. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/ab3a08.
8.
AmeriniF.MeoM.Structural health monitoring of bolted joints using linear and nonlinear acoustic/ultrasound methods. Struct Health Monit2011; 10(6): 659–672. DOI: 10.1177/1475921710395810.
9.
WangT.SongG.WangZ., et al. Proof-of-concept study of monitoring bolt connection status using a piezoelectric based active sensing method. Smart Mater Structures2013; 22(8): 087001. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/087001.
10.
ZhaoN.HuoL.SongG.A nonlinear ultrasonic method for real-time bolt looseness monitoring using PZT transducer–enabled vibro-acoustic modulation. J Intell Mater Syst Structures2020; 31(3): 364–376. DOI: 10.1177/1045389x19891534.
11.
HuoL.WangF.LiH., et al. A fractal contact theory based model for bolted connection looseness monitoring using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater Structures2017; 26(10): 104010. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aa6e93.
12.
HeiC.LuoM.GongP., et al. Quantitative evaluation of bolt connection using a single piezoceramic transducer and ultrasonic coda wave energy with the consideration of the piezoceramic aging effect. Smart Mater Structures2020; 29(2): 027001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/ab6076.
13.
KongQ.ZhuJ.HoS. C. M., et al. Tapping and listening: A new approach to bolt looseness monitoring. Smart Mater Structures2018; 27(7): 07LT02. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aac962.
14.
WangF.MobinyA.Van NguyenH., et al. If structure can exclaim: a novel robotic-assisted percussion method for spatial bolt-ball joint looseness detection. Struct Health Monit2021; 20(4): 1597–1608.
15.
LiN.WangF.SongG.New entropy-based vibro-acoustic modulation method for metal fatigue crack detection: An exploratory study. Measurement2020; 150: 107075. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107075.
16.
LinT. K.LiangJ. C.Application of multi-scale (cross-) sample entropy for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Structures2015; 24(8): 085003. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/8/085003.
17.
MousaviM.HollowayD.OlivierJ. C., et al. A Shannon entropy approach for structural damage identification based on self-powered sensor data. Eng Structures2019; 200: 109619. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109619.
18.
Makki AlamdariM.SamaliB.LiJ., et al. Structural condition assessment using entropy-based time series analysis. J Intell Mater Syst Structures2017; 28(14): 1941–1956. DOI: 10.1177/1045389x16679288.
19.
YanR.GaoR. X.Approximate entropy as a diagnostic tool for machine health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process2007; 21(2): 824–839. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.02.009.
20.
HanM.PanJ.A fault diagnosis method combined with LMD, sample entropy and energy ratio for roller bearings. Measurement2015; 76: 7–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.019.
21.
HuachunW.JianZ.ChunhuX., et al. Two-dimensional time series sample entropy algorithm: Applications to rotor axis orbit feature identification. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 147: 107123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107123.
22.
NomanK.WangD.PengZ., et al. Oscillation based permutation entropy calculation as a dynamic nonlinear feature for health monitoring of rolling element bearing. Measurement2021; 172: 108891. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108891.
23.
ZhangL.XiongG.LiuH., et al. Bearing fault diagnosis using multi-scale entropy and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37(8): 6077–6085. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.118.
24.
CostaM.GoldbergerA. L.PengC. K.Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys Review Letters2002; 89(6): 068102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.068102.
25.
YuanR.LvY.KongQ., et al. Percussion-based bolt looseness monitoring using intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and BP neural network. Smart Mater Structures2019; 28(12): 125001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/ab3b39.
26.
MahajanR.MorshedB. I.Unsupervised eye blink artifact denoising of EEG data with modified multiscale sample entropy, kurtosis, and wavelet-ICA. IEEE Journal Biomed Health Inform2014; 19(1): 158–165. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2333010.
27.
LabateD.La ForestaF.MorabitoG., et al. Entropic measures of EEG complexity in Alzheimer's disease through a multivariate multiscale approach. IEEE Sensors J2013; 13(9): 3284–3292. DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2013.2271735.
28.
YuanR.LvY.LiH., et al. Robust fault diagnosis of rolling bearings using multivariate intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and neural network under varying operating conditions. IEEE Access2019; 7: 130804–130819. DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2939546.
29.
GaoQ. W.LiuW. Y.TangB. P., et al. A novel wind turbine fault diagnosis method based on intergral extension load mean decomposition multiscale entropy and least squares support vector machine. Renew Energ2018; 116: 169–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.061.
30.
HuangN. E.ShenZ.LongS. R., et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Eng Sci1998; 454: 903–995. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
31.
FlandrinP.RillingG.GoncalvesP.Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process. Lett2004; 11(2): 112–114. DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2003.821662.
32.
RillingG.FlandrinP.GonçalvesP., et al. Bivariate empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Signal Process. Lett2007; 14(12): 936–939. DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2007.904710.
33.
ur RehmanN.MandicD. P.Empirical mode decomposition for trivariate signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process2009; 58(3): 1059–1068.
34.
RehmanN.MandicD. P.Multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci2010; 466(2117): 1291–1302. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0502.
35.
MertA.AkanA.Emotion recognition from EEG signals by using multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Pattern Anal Appl2018; 21(1): 81–89. DOI: 10.1007/s10044-016-0567-6.
36.
LvY.YuanR.SongG.Multivariate empirical mode decomposition and its application to fault diagnosis of rolling bearing. Mech Syst Signal Process2016; 81: 219–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.03.010.
ur RehmanN.AftabH.Multivariate variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process2019; 67(23): 6039–6052. DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2019.2951223.
41.
LiuS.YuK.Successive Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition Based on Instantaneous Linear Mixing Model. Signal Processing, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108311.
42.
LawrenceS.GilesC. L.TsoiA. C., et al. Face recognition: A convolutional neural-network approach. IEEE Trans Neural Networks1997; 8(1): 98–113. DOI: 10.1109/72.554195.
43.
AcharyaU. R.OhS. L.HagiwaraY., et al. A deep convolutional neural network model to classify heartbeats. Comput Biol Med2017; 89: 389–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.022.
44.
LinK. W. E.BalamuraliB. T.KohE., et al. Singing voice separation using a deep convolutional neural network trained by ideal binary mask and cross entropy. Neural Comput Appl2020; 32(4): 1037–1050. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3933-z.
45.
YuanW.DongB.WangS., et al. Evolving multi-resolution pooling CNN for monaural singing voice separation. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process2021; 29: 807–822. DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2021.3051331.
46.
ZhongS. S.FuS.LinL.A novel gas turbine fault diagnosis method based on transfer learning with CNN. Measurement2019; 137: 435–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.022.
47.
ZhaoB.ZhangX.LiH., et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearings based on normalized CNN considering data imbalance and variable working conditions. Knowledge-Based Syst2020; 199: 105971. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105971.
48.
YuanC.ChenW.HaoH., et al. Near real‐time bolt‐loosening detection using mask and region‐based convolutional neural network. Struct Control Health Monit2021; 28(7): e2741. DOI: 10.1002/stc.2741.
49.
LvY.YuanR.WangT., et al. Health degradation monitoring and early fault diagnosis of a rolling bearing based on CEEMDAN and improved MMSE. Materials2018; 11(6): 1009. DOI: 10.3390/ma11061009.
50.
WenL.LiX.GaoL., et al. A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 65(7): 5990–5998.
51.
ZhangW.LiC.PengG., et al. A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 100: 439–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022.
52.
BoutayebM.DarouachM.RafaralahyH.Generalized state-space observers for chaotic synchronization and secure communication. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Fundam Theor Appl2002; 49(3): 345–349. DOI: 10.1109/81.989169.
53.
GottwaldG. A.MelbourneI.Testing for chaos in deterministic systems with noise. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena2005; 212(1–2): 100–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2005.09.011.
54.
ZhangA.XuZ.Chaotic time series prediction using phase space reconstruction based conceptor network. Cogn Neurodynamics2020; 14(6): 849–857. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-020-09612-7.
55.
ZhangX.MiaoQ.ZhangH., et al. A parameter-adaptive VMD method based on grasshopper optimization algorithm to analyze vibration signals from rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 108: 58–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.029.
56.
WangT.SongG.WangZ., et al. Proof-of-concept study of monitoring bolt connection status using a piezoelectric based active sensing method. Smart Mater Structures2013; 22(8): 087001. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/087001.
57.
WangF.ChenZ.SongG.Smart crawfish: A concept of underwater multi-bolt looseness identification using entropy-enhanced active sensing and ensemble learning. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 149: 107186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107186.
58.
WangF.SongG.Monitoring of multi-bolt connection looseness using a novel vibro-acoustic method. Nonlinear Dyn2020: 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-020-05508-7.
59.
WangF.ChenZ.SongG.Monitoring of multi-bolt connection looseness using entropy-based active sensing and genetic algorithm-based least square support vector machine. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 136: 106507. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106507.
60.
WangZ.DingK.RenH., et al. Quantitative acoustic emission investigation on the crack evolution in concrete prisms by frequency analysis based on wavelet packet transform. Struct Health Monit2021; 14759217211018871. DOI: 10.1177/14759217211018871.
61.
LeiJ.LiuC.JiangD.Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on Long Short-term memory networks. Renew Energy2019; 133: 422–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.031.
