The stiffness and strength properties of freshly poured concrete develop over time as the concrete hardens due to curing. The monitoring of such properties therefore enables timely construction decisions such as formwork removal. Traditional point-in-time destructive tests can be cumbersome, while continuous non-destructive testing is desirable. Piezoelectric-based electromechanical impedance (EMI) and wave propagation (WP) techniques fall into the latter, and they have been verified for monitoring concrete properties during curing in the laboratory. This paper reports the first field application of the EMI and WP techniques for monitoring concrete curing, where smart aggregate (SA) sensors are embedded into concrete pour strips of a multi-storey residential building during construction. For comparison and verification purposes, destructive compression and non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests were conducted. Results obtained from both EMI and WP techniques were consistent and repeatable. They were also comparable to the UPV result, and they showed a close correlation to the compressive strength tests. The current study has also revealed that the electrical signatures acquired from the EMI and WP techniques have a linear relationship. EMI-based and WP-based semi-analytical models (and their derivations) that can quantify the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of concrete at various curing durations are also presented. This reported study ultimately demonstrates the applicability and practical application of the EMI and WP techniques for real-time measurements, bridging the gap between laboratory-based studies and field applications.
LewHFattalSShaverJ, et al. Investigation of Construction Failure of Reinforced Concrete Cooling Tower at Willow Island, West Virginia (NBS IR 78–1578), NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1979, p. 148. https://doi.org/10.6028/NBS.IR.78-1578
2.
LimYYTangZSSmithST. Piezoelectric-based monitoring of the curing of structural adhesives: a novel experimental study. Smart Mater Structures2019; 28: 015016. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aaeea4.
3.
TangZSLimYYSmithST, et al. Development of analytical and numerical models for predicting the mechanical properties of structural adhesives under curing using the PZT-based wave propagation technique. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 128: 172–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.030.
4.
TangZSLimYYSmithST, et al. Modelling of the electromechanical impedance technique for prediction of elastic modulus of structural adhesives. Struct Health Monit2020; 0: 1475921720916924. DOI: 10.1177/1475921720916924.
SongFHuangGKimJ, et al. On the study of surface wave propagation in concrete structures using a piezoelectric actuator/sensor system. Smart Materials Structures2008; 17: 055024. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/5/055024.
7.
SohCKBhallaS. Calibration of piezo-impedance transducers for strength prediction and damage assessment of concrete. Smart Materials Structures2005; 14: 671. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/026.
8.
ZhangCPandaGPYanQ, et al. Monitoring early-age hydration and setting of portland cement paste by piezoelectric transducers via electromechanical impedance method. Construction Building Mater2020; 258: 120348. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120348.
9.
TawieRLeeH. Monitoring the strength development in concrete by EMI sensing technique. Construction Building Mater2010; 24: 1746–1753. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.014.
10.
TawieRLeeH. Piezoelectric-based non-destructive monitoring of hydration of reinforced concrete as an indicator of bond development at the steel-concrete interface. Cement Concrete Res2010; 40: 1697–1703. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.08.011.
11.
AnnamdasVGMSohCK. Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: review and future issues. J Intell Material Systems Structures2010; 21: 41–59. DOI: 10.1177/1045389x09352816.
12.
DivsholiBSYangY. Combined embedded and surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers for monitoring of concrete structures. NDT E Int2014; 65: 28–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.03.009.
13.
LimYYSmithSTPadillaRV, et al. Monitoring of concrete curing using the electromechanical impedance technique: review and path forward. Struct Health Monit2021; 20(2): 604–636. DOI: 10.1177/1475921719893069.
14.
LimYYSmithSTSohCK. Wave propagation based monitoring of concrete curing using piezoelectric materials: Review and path forward. NDT E Int2018; 99: 50–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.06.002.
15.
BhallaS.A Mechanical Impedance Approach for Structural Identification, Health Monitoring and Non-destructive Evaluation Using Piezo-Impedance Transducers. PhD Thesis. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, 2004.
16.
WangDLiQZhuH, et al. Experimental study on waterproof technology of piezoelectric impedance tranducers in concrete. In Symposium On Piezoelectricity, Acoustic Waves, and Device Applications (SPAWDA 2009), Wuhan, China: IEEE. 17–20 Dec, 2009, pp. 37–37. DOI: 10.1109/spawda.2009.5428965.
17.
FengQLiangYSongG. Real-Time Monitoring of Early-Age Concrete Strength Using Piezoceramic-Based Smart Aggregates. J Aerospace Eng2019; 32: 04018115. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000939.
18.
KongQHouSJiQ, et al. Very early age concrete hydration characterization monitoring using piezoceramic based smart aggregates. Smart Mater Structures2013; 22: 085025. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/085025.
19.
LiWKongQHoSCM, et al. Feasibility study of using smart aggregates as embedded acoustic emission sensors for health monitoring of concrete structures. Smart Mater Structures2016; 25: 115031. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115031.
20.
GuHSongGDhondeH, et al. Concrete early-age strength monitoring using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Materials Structures2006; 15: 1837. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/038.
21.
ShinSWQureshiARLeeJ-Y, et al. Piezoelectric sensor based nondestructive active monitoring of strength gain in concrete. Smart Mater Structures2008; 17: 055002. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/5/055002.
22.
LuXLimYYSohCK. Investigating the performance of “Smart Probe” based indirect EMI technique for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials–Modelling and parametric study. Construction Building Mater2018; 172: 134–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.222.
23.
LuXLimYYIzadgoshasbI, et al. Strength development monitoring and dynamic modulus assessment of cementitious materials using EMI-Miniature Prism based technique. Struct Health Monit2020; 19: 373–389. DOI: 10.1177/1475921719848087.
24.
LuXLimYYSohCK. A novel electromechanical impedance–based model for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials. Struct Health Monit2018; 17: 902–918. DOI: 10.1177/1475921717725028.
25.
WangDSongHZhuH. Embedded 3D electromechanical impedance model for strength monitoring of concrete using a PZT transducer. Smart Mater Structures2014; 23: 115019. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/11/115019.
26.
GiurgiutiuVXuBChaoY, et al. Smart sensors for monitoring crack growth under fatigue loading conditions. Smart Structures Syst2006; 2: 101–113. DOI: 10.12989/sss.2006.2.2.101.
27.
LimYYSohCK. Fatigue life estimation of a 1D aluminum beam under mode-I loading using the electromechanical impedance technique. Smart Mater Structures2011; 20: 125001. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125001.
28.
LiWLiuTZouD, et al. PZT based smart corrosion coupon using electromechanical impedance. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 129: 455–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.049.
29.
ZhuHLuoHAiD, et al. Mechanical impedance-based technique for steel structural corrosion damage detection. Measurement2016; 88: 353–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.041.
30.
LiWFanSHoSCM, et al. Interfacial debonding detection in fiber-reinforced polymer rebar–reinforced concrete using electro-mechanical impedance technique. Struct Health Monit2018; 17: 461–471. DOI: 10.1177/1475921717703053.
31.
SunRSevillanoEPereraR. Debonding detection of FRP strengthened concrete beams by using impedance measurements and an ensemble PSO adaptive spectral model. Compos Structures2015; 125: 374–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.011.
32.
SunRSevillanoEPereraR. Identification of intermediate debonding damage in FRP-strengthened RC beams based on a multi-objective updating approach and PZT sensors. Composites B: Eng2017; 109: 248–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.060.
33.
AiDZhuHLuoH. Sensitivity of embedded active PZT sensor for concrete structural impact damage detection. Construction Building Mater2016; 111: 348–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.094.
34.
AiDZhuHLuoH, et al. Mechanical impedance based embedded piezoelectric transducer for reinforced concrete structural impact damage detection: A comparative study. Construction Building Mater2018; 165: 472–483. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.039.
35.
DumoulinCKaraiskosGCaretteJ, et al. Monitoring of the ultrasonic P-wave velocity in early-age concrete with embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater Structures2012; 21: 047001. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/21/4/047001.
36.
SolimanNAKhayatKHKarrayM, et al. Piezoelectric ring actuator technique to monitor early-age properties of cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Composites2015; 63: 84–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.09.001.
37.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. Non-destructive concrete strength evaluation using smart piezoelectric transducer—A comparative study. Smart Mater Structures2016; 25: 085021. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085021.
38.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. Practical issues related to the application of piezoelectric based wave propagation technique in monitoring of concrete curing. Construction Building Mater2017; 152: 506–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.163.
39.
NgC-TMohseniHLamH-F. Debonding detection in CFRP-retrofitted reinforced concrete structures using nonlinear Rayleigh wave. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 125: 245–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.027.
40.
SikdarSOstachowiczW. Nondestructive analysis of core-junction and joint-debond effects in advanced composite structure. Polym Test2019; 73: 31–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.11.011.
41.
FakihMAMustaphaSMakki AlamdariM, et al. Symbolic dynamics time series analysis for assessment of barely visible indentation damage in composite sandwich structures based on guided waves. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 4129–4143. DOI: 10.1177/0021998317696138.
42.
El NajjarJMustaphaS. Condition assessment of timber utility poles using ultrasonic guided waves. Construction Building Mater2021; 272: 121902. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121902.
43.
KeeSZhuJ. Effects of sensor locations on air-coupled surface wave transmission measurements across a surface-breaking crack. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics, Frequency Control2011; 58: 427–436. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1820.
44.
AhnEKimHParkB, et al. Long-term autogenous healing and re-healing performance in concrete: Evaluation using air-coupled surface-wave method. Construction Building Mater2021; 307: 124939. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124939.
45.
SharmaSMukherjeeA. Monitoring freshly poured concrete using ultrasonic waves guided through reinforcing bars. Cement and Concrete Composites2015; 55: 337–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.011.
46.
SunFPChaudhryZARogersCA, et al. Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. In: Smart Structures and Materials 1995: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 1995. International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, CA: SPIE, pp. 236–248.
47.
YangYLimYYSohCK. Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: I. Experiment. Smart Mater Structures2008; 17: 035008. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035008.
48.
NegiPChakrabortyTKaurN, et al. Investigations on effectiveness of embedded PZT patches at varying orientations for monitoring concrete hydration using EMI technique. Construction Building Mater2018; 169: 489–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.006.
49.
LindroseAM. Ultrasonic wave and moduli changes in a curing epoxy resin. Exp Mech1978; 18: 227–232, journal article. DOI: 10.1007/bf02328418.
50.
ASTM C597-16, Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete. 2016. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
51.
PetroJTKimJ. Detection of delamination in concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity test. Construction Building Mater2012; 26: 574–582. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.060.
52.
KaraiskosGDeraemaekerAAggelisDG, et al. Monitoring of concrete structures using the ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Smart Mater Structures2015; 24: 113001. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/113001.
53.
BS EN 12390-3 . Testing Hardened Concrete. Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. The British Standards Institution, 2019.
54.
SongGGuHMoY-L. Piezoceramic-based Smart Aggregate for Unified Performance Monitoring of Concrete Structures. United States: Patent US20080034884A1, 2011.
55.
RocchettaRBroggiMHuchetQ, et al. On-line Bayesian model updating for structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 103: 174–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.10.015.
56.
ACI 318-02. ACI Manual of Concrete Practice Part 3: Use of Concrete in Buildings – Design, Specifications, and Related Topics. 2002. American Concrete Institute.
57.
AiDLinCLuoH, et al. Temperature effect on electromechanical admittance–based concrete structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit2020; 19: 661–692. DOI: 10.1177/1475921719860397.
58.
HanS-HKimJ-K. Effect of temperature and age on the relationship between dynamic and static elastic modulus of concrete. Cement Concrete Res2004; 34: 1219–1227. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.011.
59.
NausDJ. The Effect of Elevated Temperature on Concrete Materials and Structures - a Literature Review. United States, 2006. DOI: 10.2172/974590.
60.
ZouDDuCLiuT, et al. Effects of temperature on the performance of the piezoelectric-based smart aggregates active monitoring method for concrete structures. Smart Mater Structures2019; 28: 035016. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aafe15.
61.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. Parametric study and modeling of PZT based wave propagation technique related to practical issues in monitoring of concrete curing. Construction Building Mater2018; 176: 519–530. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.074.
