Periodic assessment of steam generator tubes of a sodium-cooled nuclear reactor is very crucial for smooth operation of steam generators. To examine the integrity, an in-bore magnetostrictive transducer capable of launching and receiving longitudinal ultrasonic guided waves (L(0,2) mode) from the inner diameter side of a steam generator tube developed in-house is used. Preliminary tests conducted on defective steam generator tubes with thermal expansion bends (three successive bends) of the mockup steam generator test facility yield a good sensitivity of 20% wall thickness deep flaw (0.46-mm deep and 1-mm wide half-circumferential groove) and the location accuracy of 10 mm. In order to remove high noise, wavelet-based denoising using discrete wavelet transform is used which improves the signal-to-noise ratio by 5–10 dB. In addition, cross-correlation technique is also used to denoise and unambiguously identify the defect echoes amid noise and multiple reflections between the defects. Furthermore, influence of the thermal expansion bend and tubesheet–spigot structure on L(0,2) mode is studied using the finite element analysis. It is observed that in the thermal expansion (multiple) bend, axisymmetric L(0,2) mode becomes non-axisymmetric (maximum and minimum amplitudes at extrados and intrados, respectively) and undergoes mode conversion to a weak flexural mode F(1,3). The results are validated experimentally. In the tubesheet–spigot structure, L(0,2) mode is found to have ∼10% reflection from spigot–tubesheet transitions, and it is seen to mode convert to bulk waves in the tubesheet. In conclusion, thicker tubesheets are found to be better from the perspective of inspection.
MitraTKPaiAKumarP. Challenges in manufacture of PFBR steam generators. Energy Procedia2011; 7: 317–322.
2.
ThirunavukkarasuSRaoBPCSharmaGK, et al. Methodology for nondestructive assessment of integrity of steam generator shell welds. Int J Struct Integr2011; 2: 145–157.
3.
ThirunavukkarasuSRaoBPCJayakumarT, et al. Techniques for processing remote field eddy current signals from bend regions of steam generator tubes of prototype fast breeder reactor. Ann Nucl Energy2011; 38: 817–824.
4.
VaidyanathanSThirunavukkarasuSRaoBPC, et al. Development of remote field eddy current technique for in-service inspection of ferromagnetic steam generator tubes. J Non-destruct Tes Eval2005; 4(1): 26–30.
5.
ASME Article 26 SE-2096: 2010. Standard practice for in-situ examination of ferromagnetic heat-exchanger tubes using remote field testing (ASTM Section V), pp. 556-565.
6.
AlleyneDNPavlakovicBLoweMJS, et al. Rapid, long range inspection of chemical plant pipework using guided waves. Key Eng Mater2004; 270-273: 434–441.
7.
AlleyneDNCawleyP. The excitation of Lamb waves in pipes using dry-coupled piezoelectric transducers. J Non-destruct Eval1995; 15(1): 11–20.
8.
AristeguiCLoweMJSCawelyP. Guided waves in fluid-filled pipes surrounded by different fluids. Ultrasonics2001; 39: 367–375.
9.
LowePSRuth SandersonMNikolaosV, et al. Inspection of cylindrical structures using the first longitudinal guided wave mode in isolation for higher flaw sensitivity. IEEE Sens J2016; 16(3): 706–714.
10.
Jae ShinHJoseph RoseL. Guided wave tuning principles for defect detection in tubing. J Nondestruct Eval1998; 17: 27–36.
11.
VogtTAlleyneDPavlakovicB. Application of guided wave technology to tube inspection. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on NDT (ECNDT), Berlin, September 2006, pp. 1-8. https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=3961
12.
BhadwalNTorabi MilaniMCoyleT, et al. A dry coupling of ultrasonic transducer components for high temperature applications. Sensors2019; 19(24): 53831–53812.
13.
DrinkwaterBDwyer-JoyceRCawleyP. A study of the transmission of ultrasound across solid–rubber interfaces. J Acoust Soc Am1997; 101(2): 970–981.
14.
DrinkwaterBDwyer-JoyceRSCawleyP. A study of the interaction between ultrasound and a partially contacting solid-solid interface. Proc R Soc Lond A1996; 452: 2613–2628.
15.
FateriSShehan LowePBoulgourisB, et al. Investigation of ultrasonic guided waves interacting with piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Sens J2015; 15(8): 4319–4328.
16.
XuJSunYZhouJ. Research on the lift-off effect of receiving longitudinal mode guided waves in pipes based on the Villari effect. Sensors2016; 16(9): 1529; 1–14.
17.
CongMAWuXQianC. A longitudinal mode electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) based on a permanent magnet chain for pipe inspection. Sensors2016; 16(5): 1–18.
18.
HuangSWangSLiW, et al. Electromagnetic ultrasonic guided waves. Singapore: Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology, Springer, 2016.
19.
KwunHAntonioSTellerCM. Non-destructive evaluation of pipes and tubes using magnetostrictive sensors. US5581037 Patent, 1996.
20.
AbramovichH. Intelligent materials structures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.
21.
Frederick CalkinsTAlison FlatauBMarcelo DapinoJ. Overview of magnetostrictive sensor technology. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2007; 18(10): 1057–1066.
22.
KwunHBartelsKA. Magnetostrictive sensor technology and its applications. Ultrasonics1998; 36: 171178.
23.
PuthusseriRBalasubramaniamK. Influence of magnetostrictive strip size in the generation of L(02) and T(01) wave mode using magnetostrictive patch transducer (MPT). AIP Conf Proc2019; 2102: 050023: 1-6.
24.
KimYYKwonYE. Review of magnetostrictive patch transducers and applications in ultrasonic nondestructive testing of waveguides. Ultrasonics2015; 62: 3–19.
KwunHSang KimYGlenn LightM. Magnetostrictive sensor technology for long-range guided wave inspection and monitoring of pipe. NDT Tech2011; 10(2): 6–9.
27.
MuthuNVinogradovS. Application of guided wave technology for screening of SeaCure tubing. In: Proceedings of the 6th international EPRI conference on NDE in relation to structural integrity of nuclear and pressurized components, Budapest, October 2007. https://www.ndt.net/article/jrc-nde2007/papers/29_15-17.pdf
28.
Sergey VinogradovA. Tuning of torsional mode guided wave technology for screening of carbon steel heat exchanger tubing. Mater Eval2008; 66(4): 419–424.
29.
VinogradovSAJacobsS. Experimental and theoretical investigation for the use of guided waves to detect and size corrosion/erosion defects in heat exchanger tubes. In: Proceedings of the 7th EPRI balance of plant heat exchanger NDE symposium, Santa Ana Pueblo, New Mexico, 2002, pp. 1-10. https://www.ndt.net/article/ndtnet/2010/vinogradov.pdf
30.
KwunHDynesC. Long-range guided wave inspection of pipe using the magnetostrictive sensor technology – feasibility of defect characterization. SPIE Proc1998; 3398: 28–34.
31.
CheongY-MKimS. Acoustic performance of a magnetostrictive strip sensor for a torsional guided wave. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ANDE 2007, Singapore, 2008, pp. 418-423. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812790194_0070
32.
SunPWuXXuJ, et al. Enhancement of the excitation efficiency of the non-contact magnetostrictive sensor for pipe inspection by adjusting the alternating magnetic field axial length. Sensors2014; 14: 1544–1563.
33.
NarayananMMKumarAThirunavukkarasuS, et al. Development of ultrasonic guided wave inspection methodology for steam generator tubes of prototype fast breeder reactor. Ultrasonics2019; 93: 112–121.
34.
NarayananMMArjunVKumarA, et al. Development of in-bore magnetostrictive transducer for ultrasonic guided wave based-inspection of steam generator tubes of PFBR. Ultrasonics2020; 102: 106148.
35.
HeinleinSCawleyPVogtTK. Reflection of torsional T(0,1) waves from defects in pipe bends. NDT&E Int2018; 93: 57–63.
36.
NiJZhouSZhangP, et al. Effect of pipe bend configuration on guided waves-based defects detection: an experimental study. J Press Vess Technol2015; 138(2): 021203–1-9.
37.
VermaBMishraTKBalasubramaniamK, et al. Interaction of low-frequency axisymmetric ultrasonic guided waves with bends in pipes of arbitrary bend angle and general bend radius. Ultrasonics2014; 54: 801–808.
38.
DemmaACawleyPLoweM, et al. The effect of bends on the propagation of guided waves in pipes. Trans ASME2005; 127: 328–335.
39.
QiMXZhangPGNiJ, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of ultrasonic guided wave propagation in bent tube. Procedia Eng2015; 130: 1603–1611.
40.
HayashiTKawashimaKSunZ, et al. Guided wave propagation mechanics across a pipe elbow. Tran ASME2005; 127: 322–327.
41.
NishinoHMasudaSMizobuchiY, et al. Long-range testing of welded elbow pipe using T(0,1) mode ultrasonic guided wave. Japanese J Appl Phys2010; 49: 116602–1-9.
42.
PredoiMVPetreCC. Guided waves scattering by discontinuities near pipe bends. Proc Meet Acoust2013; 19: 1–9.
43.
ShengLGPingTJLiangW, et al. Defects detection in typical positions of bend tubes using low-frequency ultrasonic guided wave. J Cent South Univ2015; 22: 3860–3867.
SunJSLeeKHLeeHP. Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems. J Mater Proc Technol2000; 105: 110–118.
46.
RoseJL. Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
47.
GiurgiutiuV. Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. New York: Academic Press, 2008.
48.
MatzVSmidRKreidlM, et al. Comparison of de-noising methods used for EMAT signals. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on NDT, Berlin, September 2006, pp. 1-7. https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=3849
49.
MarioliDNarduzziCOffelliC, et al. Digital time-of-flight measurement for ultrasonic sensors. IEEE Tran Instrum Meas1992; 41(1): 93–97.
50.
MallettRMudgePJGanTH, et al. Analysis of cross-correlation and wavelet de-noising for the reduction of the effects of dispersion in long-range ultrasonic testing. Insight2007; 49(6): 350–355.
51.
RioulOVetterliM. Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag1991; 8(4): 14–38.
52.
Ingrid Daubechies. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math1988; 41(7): 909–996.
53.
LazaroJC. Noise reduction in ultrasonic NDT using discrete wavelet transform processing. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Munich, Germany, 8-11 October 2002, pp. 777-780. New York: IEEE.
DrozdzMB. Efficient finite element modelling of ultrasonic waves in elastic media. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, University of London, London, 2008.
KumarA. Correlation of microstructure and mechanical properties with ultrasonic parameters in metallic materials. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, 2005.
58.
SiqueiraMHSGattsCENda SilvaRR, et al. The use of ultrasonic guided waves and wavelets analysis in pipe inspection. Ultrasonics2004; 41: 785–797.
59.
RizzoPCammarataMBartoliI. Francesco Lanza di Scalea, Salvatore Salamone, Stefano Coccia, Robert Phillips, Ultrasonic guided waves-based monitoring of rail head: Laboratory and field tests. Adv Civil Eng2010; 2010: 1-13.
60.
LazaroJCSan EmeterioJLRamosA, et al. Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. Ultrasonics2002; 40: 263–267.
61.
MeyersMA. Dynamic behaviour of materials. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
