ChanTThambiratnamDP.Structural health monitoring in Australia. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2011, p.1–229.
2.
NgC-TChanTHT. Special Issue on Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Structures. Structural Health Monitoring2014; 13: 345–346. DOI: 10.1177/1475921714542895.
3.
NguyenTChanTHTThambiratnamDPet al. Development of a cost-effective and flexible vibration DAQ system for long-term continuous structural health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing2015; 64–65: 313–324.
4.
NguyenAKodikaraKATLChanTHTet al. Deterioration assessment of buildings using an improved hybrid model updating approach and long-term health monitoring data. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718799984. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718799984.
5.
JamaliSChanTHTNguyenAet al. Reliability-based load-carrying capacity assessment of bridges using structural health monitoring and nonlinear analysis. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718808462. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718808462.
6.
AlamdariMMDang KhoaNLWangYet al. A multi-way data analysis approachfor structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718790727. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718790727.
7.
NguyenK-DChanTHTThambiratnamDPet al. Damage identification in a complex truss structure using modal characteristics correlation method and sensitivity-weighted search space. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718809471. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718809471.
8.
AyAKhooSWangY.Probability Distribution of Decay Rate: a statistical time-domain damping parameter for structural damage identification. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718817336. DOI: 10.1177/147 5921718817336.
9.
DackermannUSmithWAAlamdariMMet al. Cepstrum-based damage identification in structures with progressive damage. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718804730. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718804730.
10.
PathirageCSNLiJLiLet al. Development and application of a deep learning–based sparse autoencoder framework for structural damage identification. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718800363. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718800363.
11.
YuYDackermannULiJet al. Wavelet packet energy–based damage identification of wood utility poles using support vector machine multi-classifier and evidence theory. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718798622. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718798622.
12.
YuYWangCGuXet al. A novel deep learning-based method for damage identification of smart building structures. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 147592171880 4132. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718804132.
13.
SriramadasuRCLuYBanerjeeS.Identification of incipient pitting corrosion in reinforced concrete structures using guided waves and piezoelectric wafer transducers. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718809 151. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718809151.
14.
GiriPKharkovskySZhuXet al. Characterization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer strengthened concrete and gap detection with a piezoelectric-based sensory technique. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718 803790. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718803790.
15.
GuanRLuYWangKet al. Fatigue crack detection in pipes with multiple mode nonlinear guided waves. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718791134. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718791134.
16.
YangYNgC-TKotousovA.Bolted joint integrity monitoring with second harmonic generated by guided waves. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718 814399. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718814399.
17.
HughesJMVidlerJNgC-Tet al. Comparative evaluation of in situ stress monitoring with Rayleigh waves. Structural Health Monitoring2018: 1475921718798146. DOI: 10.1177/1475921718798146.
