Separating damage from environmental effects affecting civil structures for near real-time damage detection

Abstract

Analyzing changes in vibration properties (e.g. natural frequencies) of structures as a result of damage has been heavily used by researchers for damage detection of civil structures. These changes, however, are not only caused by damage of the structural components, but they are also affected by the varying environmental conditions the structures are faced with, such as the temperature change, which limits the use of most damage detection methods presented in the literature that did not account for these effects. In this article, a damage detection method capable of distinguishing between the effects of damage and of the changing environmental conditions affecting damage sensitivity features is proposed. This method eliminates the need to form the baseline of the undamaged structure using damage sensitivity features obtained from a wide range of environmental conditions, as conventionally has been done, and utilizes features from two extreme and opposite environmental conditions as baselines. To allow near real-time monitoring, subsequent measurements are added one at a time to the baseline to create new data sets. Principal component analysis is then introduced for processing each data set so that patterns can be extracted and damage can be distinguished from environmental effects. The proposed method is tested using a two-dimensional truss structure and validated using measurements from the Z24 Bridge which was monitored for nearly a year, with damage scenarios applied to it near the end of the monitoring period. The results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method for damage detection under changing environmental conditions. The method also works despite the nonlinear effects produced by environmental conditions on damage sensitivity features. Moreover, since each measurement is allowed to be analyzed one at a time, near real-time monitoring is possible. Damage progression can also be given from the method which makes it advantageous for damage evolution monitoring.

Keywords

Damage detection environmental conditions temperature variation principal component analysis structural health monitoring data normalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sohn

. Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philos T Roy Soc A 2007; 365(1851): 539–560.

Farrar

Doebling

Cornwell

et al . Variability of modal parameters measured on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. In: Proceedings of the 15th international modal analysis conference, Orlanda, FL, 3–6 February 1997, pp. 257–263. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics.

Alampalli

. Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters. In: Proceedings of the 16th international modal analysis conference, Santa Barbara, CA, 2–5 February 1998, pp. 111–116. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics.

Peeters

De Roeck

. One-year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001; 30(2): 149–171.

Rohrmann

Baessler

Said

et al . Structural causes of temperature affected modal data of civil structures obtained by long time monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, TX, 7–10 February 2000, pp. 1–7. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics.

Chak

Wang

et al . Formulation of an uncertainty model relating modal parameters and environmental factors by using long-term monitoring data. In: Proceedings of smart structures and materials 2003: smart systems and nondestructive evaluation for civil infrastructures, San Diego, CA, 2–6 March 2003, pp. 298–307. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

Conte

Fraser

et al . Long-term monitoring of a highway bridge. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international operational modal analysis conference, Portonovo, 4–6 May 2009, pp. 29–36. Red Hook, NY: Curran & Associates Inc.

. Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng Struct 2005; 27(12): 1715–1725.

Zhou

. A summary review of correlations between temperatures and vibration properties of long-span bridges. Math Probl in Eng 2014; 2014: 638209.

10.

Fritzen

Mengelkamp

Guemes

. Elimination of temperature effects on damage detection within a smart structure concept. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, 15–17 September 2003, pp. 1530–1538. DEStech Publications Inc.

11.

Dervilis

Worden

Cross

. On robust regression analysis as a means of exploring environmental and operational conditions for SHM data. J Sound Vib 2015; 347: 279–296.

12.

Worden

Sohn

Farrar

. Novelty detection in a changing environment: regression and interpolation approaches. J Sound Vib 2002; 258(4): 741–761.

13.

Peeters

Maeck

De Roeck

. Dynamic monitoring of the Z24-bridge: separating temperature effects from damage. In: Proceedings of the European COST F3 conference on system identification and structural health monitoring, Madrid, June 2000, pp. 377–386. Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

14.

Fan

Zheng

et al . Automatic modal identification of cable-supported bridges instrumented with a long-term monitoring system. In: Proceedings of the smart structures and materials 2003: smart systems and nondestructive evaluation for civil infrastructures, San Diego, CA, 2–6 March 2003, pp. 329–339. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

15.

Kullaa

. Elimination of environmental influences from damage-sensitive features in a structural health monitoring system. In: Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on structural health monitoring, Paris, 10–12 July 2002, pp. 742–749. DEStech Publications Inc.

16.

Yan

Kerschen

De Boe

et al . Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditionspart I: a linear analysis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2005; 19(4): 847–864.

17.

Kullaa

. Structural health monitoring under variable environmental or operational conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European workshop on structural health monitoring, Munich, 7–9 July 2004, pp. 1262–1269. DEStech Publications Inc.

18.

Deraemaeker

Reynders

De Roeck

et al . Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2008; 22(1): 34–56.

19.

Cross

Worden

Chen

. Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat 2011; 467(2133): 2712–2732.

20.

Manson

. Identifying damage sensitive, environment insensitive features for damage detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on identification in engineering systems, Swansea, 15–17 April 2002, pp. 187–197. University of Swansea.

21.

Yan

Kerschen

De Boe

et al . Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditionspart II: local pca for non-linear cases. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2005; 19(4): 865–880.

22.

Sohn

Worden

Farrar

. Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2002; 13(9): 561–574.

23.

Reynders

Wursten

De Roeck

. Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification. Struct Health Monit 2014; 13(1): 82–93.

24.

Smith

. A tutorial on principal components analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 2002, http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/cosc453/student_tutorials/principal_components.pdf

25.

Sharma

. Applied multivariate techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

26.

Krämer

De Smet

De Roeck

. Z24 bridge damage detection tests. In: Proceedings of the 17th international modal analysis conference, Kissimmee, FL, 8–11 February 1999, pp. 1023–1029. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics.