Diagnosis and prognosis are key issues in the application of condition based maintenance. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the condition of a machine. Physics-based models are of great interest as they give the response of a modelled system in different operating conditions. This strategy allows for the generation of synthetic data that can be used in combination with real data acquired by sensors to improve maintenance. The article presents an electromechanical model for a rotating machine, with special emphasis on the modelling of rolling element bearings. The proposed model is validated by comparing the simulation results and the experimental results in different operating conditions and different damaged states. This comparison shows good agreement, obtaining differences of up to 10% for the modelling of the whole rotating machine and less than 0.6% for the model of the bearing.
ISO 13372:2012. Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—Vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
2.
MishraMLeturiondo-ZubizarretaUSalgado-PiconO. Hybrid modelling for failure diagnosis and prognosis in the transport sector. Acquired data and synthetic data. Dyna2015; 90(2): 139–145.
3.
LeturiondoUMishraMGalarD. Synthetic data generation in hybrid modelling of rolling element bearings. Non-Destruct Test2015; 57(7): 395–400.
4.
SinghSHowardCQHansenCH.An extensive review of vibration modelling of rolling element bearings with localised and extended defects. J Sound Vib2015; 357: 300–330.
5.
TandonNChoudhuryA.An analytical model for the prediction of the vibration response of rolling element bearings due to a localized defect. J Sound Vib1997; 205(3): 275–292.
6.
ChangqingBQingyuX.Dynamic model of ball bearings with internal clearance and waviness. J Sound Vib2006; 294(1-2): 23–48.
7.
KoganGKleinRKushnirskyA. Toward a 3D dynamic model of a faulty duplex ball bearing. Mech Syst Signal Pr2015; 54–55: 243–258.
8.
AhmadiAMPetersenDHowardC.A nonlinear dynamic vibration model of defective bearings — The importance of modelling the finite size of rolling elements. Mech Syst Signal Pr2015; 52–53: 309–326.
9.
SassiSBadriBThomasM.A numerical model to predict damaged bearing vibrations. J Vib Control2007; 13(11): 1603–1628.
10.
BehzadMBastamiAMbaD.A new model for estimating vibrations generated in the defective rolling element bearings. J Vib Acoust2011; 133(4): 041011.
11.
RafsanjaniAAbbasionSFarshidianfarA. Nonlinear dynamic modeling of surface defects in rolling element bearing systems. J Sound Vib2009; 319(3-5): 1150–1174.
12.
ArslanHAktürkN.An investigation of rolling element vibrations caused by local defects. J Tribol2008; 130(4): 041101.
13.
KulkarniPSahasrabudheA.A dynamic model of ball bearing for simulating localized defects on outer race using cubic hermite spline. J Mech Sci Technol2014; 28(9): 3433–3442.
14.
WangFJingMYiJ. Dynamic modelling for vibration analysis of a cylindrical roller bearing due to localized defects on raceways. P I Mech Eng K—J Mul2015; 229(1): 39–64.
15.
PetersenDHowardCSawalhiN. Analysis of bearing stiffness variations, contact forces and vibrations in radially loaded double row rolling element bearings with raceway defects. Mech Syst Signal Pr2015; 50–51: 139–160.
16.
ChoudhuryATandonN.Vibration response of rolling element bearings in a rotor bearing system to a local defect under radial load. J Tribol2006; 128(2): 252–261.
17.
KhanamSTandonNDuttJK.Multi-event excitation force model for inner race defect in a rolling element bearing. J Tribol2016; 138(1): 011106.
18.
ZhangYYWangXLZhangXQ. Dynamic analysis of a high-speed rotor-ball bearing system under elastohydrodynamic lubrication. J Vib Acoust2014; 136(6): 061003.
19.
CuiLZhengJ.Nonlinear vibration and stability analysis of a flexible rotor supported on angular contact ball bearings. J Vib Control2014; 20(12): 1767–1782.
20.
SawalhiNRandallRB. Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I. The combined gear bearing dynamic model and the simulation of localised bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Pr2008; 22(8): 1924–1951.
21.
NakhaeinejadM.Fault detection and model-based diagnostics in nonlinear dynamic systems. PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, USA, 2010.
LeturiondoUSalgadoOGalarD. Methodology for the physics-based modelling of multiple rolling element bearing configurations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics2016, August5.
25.
PelchenCSchweigerCOtterM.Modeling and simulating the efficiency of gearboxes and planetary gearboxes. In Proceedings of 2nd International Modelica Conference, Oberpfaffenhofen, 18–19 March 2002, pp.257–266.
26.
KralCHaumerA.Modelica libraries for DC machines, three phase and polyphase machines. In Proceedings of the 4th International Modelica Conference, Hamburg, 7–8 March 2005, pp.549–558.
ZarriLMengoniMTaniA. Control schemes for field weakening of induction machines: A review. In IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD), Torino, 26–27 March 2015, pp.146–155. IEEE.
29.
BojoiRGuglielmiPPellegrinoG. Sensorless stator field-oriented control for low cost induction motor drives with wide field weakening range. In IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS ‘08), Edmonton, 5–9 October 2008, pp.1–7. IEEE.
30.
EstebanESalgadoOIturrospeA. Model-based approach for elevator performance estimation. Mech Syst Signal Pr2016; 68–69: 125–137.
31.
TorreyDASelamogullariUS.Modelica implementation of field-oriented controlled 3-phase induction machine drive. In Proceedings of 2nd International Modelica Conference, Oberpfaffenhofen, 18–19 March 2002, pp.173–181.
32.
OtterMElmqvistHCellierFE.“Relaxing”—A symbolic sparse matrix method exploiting the model structure in generating efficient simulation code. In Keynote address, CESA’96 IMACS Multiconference, Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation, Lille, 9–12 July 1996, pp.1–12.
33.
PetzoldLR.A description of DASSL, a differential–algebraic system solver. Scientif Comput1983; 65–68.
34.
ASME V V 10. Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. ASME, New York, 2006.
35.
RaoA.Gear friction coefficients and forces. Wear1979; 53(1): 87–93.
36.
PetrescuRVPetrescuFIT. Gear solutions color. Books on Demand, Germany, 2013.
37.
SmithWARandallRB.Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study. Mech Syst Signal Pr2015; 64–65: 100–131.
