In this contribution, first, the results in the development of a structural health monitoring approach for the foundations of an offshore wind turbine based on its resonance frequencies will be presented. Key problems are the operational and environmental variability of the resonance frequencies of the turbine that potentially conceal any structural change. This article uses a (non-)linear regression model to compensate for the environmental variations. An operational case-by-case monitoring strategy is suggested to cope with the dynamic variability between different operational cases of the turbine. Real-life data obtained from an offshore turbine on a monopile foundation are used to validate the presented strategy and to demonstrate the performance of the presented approach. First, the results indicate an overall stiffening of the investigated structure.
ZaaijerMVan der TempelJ. Scour protection: a necessity or a waste of money. In: Proceedings of the 43rd international energy agency (IEA) topical expert meeting, Dublin, Ireland, 9–10 November 2004, pp. 43–51.
2.
De SitterGWeijtjensWEl-KafafyM. Monitoring changes in the soil and foundation characteristics of an offshore wind turbine using automated operational modal analysis. In: BasuB (ed.) Damage assessment of structures X, pts 1 and 2. Pfaffikon: Trans Tech Publications, Inc., 2013, pp. 652–659.
3.
SeidelM. Substructures for offshore wind turbines—current trends and developments. Festschrift Peter Schaumann 2014. doi:10.2314/GBV:77999762X
4.
SørensenSPHIbsenLB. Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour. Ocean Eng2013; 63: 17–25.
5.
Van der TempelJ. Design of support structures for offshore wind turbines. Delft: TU Delft, 2006.
6.
DevriendtCMagalhãesFWeijtjensW. Automatic identification of the modal parameters of an offshore wind turbine using state-of-the-art operational modal analysis techniques. In: Proceedings of the 5th international operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC 2013), Guimaraes, Portugal, 13–15 May 2013.
7.
DevriendtCMagalhãesFWeijtjensW. Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines using automated operational modal analysis. Struct Health Monit2014; 13: 644–659.
8.
WeijtjensWShirzadehRDe SitterG. Classifying resonant frequencies and damping values of an offshore wind turbine on a monopile foundation. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy association (EWEA), Barcelona, 10–13 March 2014.
9.
IVA MDK—afdeling Kust—Meetnet Vlaamse Banken.
10.
WeijtjensW. Advanced methods for estimating and monitoring the modal parameters of operational systems subjected to non-white excitation. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2014.
11.
TcherniakDChauhanSHansenMH. Applicability limits of operational modal analysis to operational wind turbines. In: ProulxT (ed.) Structural dynamics and renewable energy, vol. 1 (conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol. 10). New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 317–327.
12.
ManzatoSDevriendtCWeijtjensW. Removing the influence of rotor harmonics for improved monitoring of offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC XXXII), Orlando, FL, 3–6 February 2014.
13.
MartinsNCaetanoEDiordS. Dynamic monitoring of a stadium suspension roof: wind and temperature influence on modal parameters and structural response. Eng Struct2014; 59: 80–94.
14.
MagalhãesFCunhaÁCaetanoE. Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: from automated OMA to damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Pr2012; 28: 212–228.
15.
OliveiraGMagalhãesFCunhaÁ. Implementation of a dynamic monitoring system on a wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural dynamics, EURODYN 2014 (eds CunhaACaetanoERibeiroP.), Porto, 30 June–2 July 2014, pp. 3683–3690.
16.
HäckellMWRolfesR. Long-Term monitoring of modal parameters for SHM at a 5 MW offshore wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on structural heath monitoring (IWSHM), Stanford, CA, 10–12 September 2013.
17.
EwinsDJ. Modal testing: theory, practice and application, vol. 2. Baldock: Research Studies Press, 2000.
18.
VerbovenPParlooEGuillaumeP. Autonomous structural health monitoring—part I: modal parameter estimation and tracking. Mech Syst Signal Pr2002; 16(4): 637–657.
19.
FarrarCRWordenK. Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
20.
SohnH. Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philos T Roy Soc A2007; 365(1851): 539–560.
21.
PeetersBDe RoeckG. One year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental influences versus damage events. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC XVIII), a conference on structural dynamics, San Antonio, TX, 7–10 February 2000.
22.
SohnHDzwonczykMStraserEG. An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. Earthq Eng Struct D1999; 28(8): 879–897.
23.
LeBlancCHoulsbyGTByrneBW. Response of stiff piles in sand to long-term cyclic lateral loading. Geotechnique2009; 60(2): 79–90.
24.
BhattacharyaSCoxJALombardiD. Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng2012; 166(2): 159–169.
25.
DamgaardMBayatMAndersenLV. Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of saturated soil subjected to cyclic loading from offshore monopile wind turbine foundations. Comput Geotech2014; 61(0): 116–126.
26.
OhCKSohnH. Damage diagnosis under environmental and operational variations using unsupervised support vector machine. J Sound Vib2009; 325(1): 224–239.
27.
SohnHWordenKFarrarCR. Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. J Intel Mat Syst Str2002; 13(9): 561–574.
28.
ReyndersEWurstenGDe RoeckG. Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of non-linear system identification. Struct Health Monit2014; 13(1): 82–93.
29.
WeijtjensWDe SitterGDevriendtC. Operational modal parameter estimation of MIMO systems using transmissibility functions. Automatica2014; 50(2): 559–564.
30.
RandallRBPeetersBAntoniJ. New cepstral methods of signal pre-processing for operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on modal analysis (ISMA), Leuven, Belgium, 17–19 September 2012, pp. 755–764.
