The goal of this study is vibration-based damage precise localization on three-dimensional structures through the vector version of an advanced Functional Model–Based Method. This version, which constitutes an extension of the original scalar method, is equipped with a Functional Model form that may simultaneously exploit multiple structural responses and incorporate the damage coordinates within its parameters through an appropriate operating parameter vector. Based on this model form, precise estimation of the damage coordinates is achieved within a nonlinear optimization framework with constraints representing the three-dimensional structural topology, and corresponding damage confidence intervals are constructed. The effectiveness of the method is assessed through damage precise localization for numerous damage scenarios in a three-dimensional truss structure, as well as through detailed comparisons with the previous, scalar method, demonstrating significant reduction in the localization error.
FritzenCP. Vibration-based techniques for structural health monitoring. In: BalageasDFritzenCPGüemesA (eds) Structural health monitoring. London: ISTE, 2006, pp. 45–224.
3.
HumarJBagchiAXuH. Performance of vibration-based techniques for the identification of structural damage. Struct Health Monit2006; 5(3): 215–241.
4.
FanWQiaoP. Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit2011; 10(1): 83–111.
5.
RizosDDFassoisSDMarioli-RigaZP. Vibration-based skin damage statistical detection and restoration assessment in a stiffened aircraft panel. Mech Syst Signal Pr2008; 22(2): 315–337.
6.
KopsaftopoulosFPFassoisSD. Scalar and vector time series methods for vibration based damage diagnosis in a scale aircraft skeleton structure. J Theor Appl Mech2011; 49(3): 727–756.
7.
BassevilleMMevelLVecchioA. Output-only subspace-based damage detection—application to a reticular structure. Struct Health Monit2003; 2(2): 161–168.
8.
DöhlerMMevelLHilleF. Subspace-based damage detection under changes in the ambient excitation statistics. Struct Health Monit2014; 45(1): 207–224.
9.
FarrarCRWordenK. Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
10.
FassoisSDSakellariouJS. Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures. Philos T Roy Soc A2007; 365(1851): 411–448.
11.
FassoisSDSakellariouJS. Statistical time series methods for structural health monitoring. In: BollerCChangFKFujinoY (eds) Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2009, pp.443–472.
12.
BrownjohnJMWXiaPQHaoH. Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies. Finite Elem Anal Des2001; 37(10): 761–775.
13.
TeughelsARoeckGD. Damage detection and parameter identification by finite element model updating. Arch Comput Method E2005; 12(2): 123–164.
14.
PereraRRuizA. A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Mech Syst Signal Pr2008; 22(4): 970–991.
15.
ReyndersETeughelsARoeckGD. Finite element model updating and structural damage identification using OMAX data. Mech Syst Signal Pr2010; 24(5): 1306–1323.
16.
LautourORDOmenzetterP. Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition. Mech Syst Signal Pr2010; 24(5): 1556–1569.
17.
DöhlerMMarinLBernalD. Statistical decision making for damage localization with stochastic load vectors. Mech Syst Signal Pr2013; 39(1–2): 426–440.
18.
WordenKMansonGDenoeuxT. An evidence-based approach to damage location on an aircraft structure. Mech Syst Signal Pr2009; 23(6): 1792–1804.
19.
ParkJHKimJTHongDS. Sequential damage detection approaches for beams using time-modal features and artificial neural networks. J Sound Vib2009; 323(1–2): 451–474.
20.
MattsonSGPanditSM. Damage detection and localization based on outlying residuals. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15(6): 1801.
21.
BalmesEBassevilleMMevelL. Statistical model–based damage localization: a combined subspace-based and substructuring approach. Struct Control Hlth2008; 15(6): 857–875.
22.
OkashaNMFrangopolDMSaydamD. Reliability analysis and damage detection in high-speed naval craft based on structural health monitoring data. Struct Health Monit2010; 10(4): 361–379.
23.
MosaviAADickeyDSeracinoR. Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances. Mech Syst Signal Pr2012; 26: 254–267.
24.
FassoisSDKopsaftopoulosFP. Vibration based health monitoring for a lightweight truss structure: experimental assessment of several statistical time series methods. Mech Syst Signal Pr2010; 24(7): 1977–1997.
25.
KopsaftopoulosFPFassoisSD. A functional model based statistical time series method for vibration based damage detection, localization, and magnitude estimation. Mech Syst Signal Pr2013; 39(1–2): 143–161.
26.
SakellariouJSFassoisSD. Vibration based fault detection and identification in an aircraft skeleton structure via a stochastic functional model based method. Mech Syst Signal Pr2008; 22(3): 557–573.
27.
SakarisCSSakellariouJSFassoisSD. Damage detection and precise localization via a vibration based functional model method: application to a 3D truss structure. In: Proceedings of 6th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Dresden, Germany, 3–6 July 2012 (Journal version submitted for publication).
28.
SakarisCSSakellariouJSFassoisSD. Precise vibration-based damage localization in 3D structures consisting of 1D elements: single vs multiple response measurements. In: Proceedings of 7th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Nantes, France, 8–11 July 2014.
29.
HiosJDFassoisSD. Stochastic identification of temperature effects on the dynamics of a smart composite beam: assessment of multi-model and global model approaches. Smart Mater Struct2009; 18(3): 035011.
30.
HiosJDFassoisSD. A global statistical model based approach for vibration response-only damage detection under various temperatures: a proof-of-concept study. Mech Syst Signal Pr2014; 49(1–2): 77–94.
31.
LjungL. System identification: theory for the user. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
32.
FassoisSDLeeJE. On the problem of stochastic experimental modal analysis based on multiple-excitation multiple-response data—part II: the modal analysis approach. J Sound Vib1993; 161(1): 57–87.
33.
LütkepohlH. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
34.
AbramowitzMStegunIA. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. 10th ed.New York: Dover, 1972.
