Recently, damage detection capability has been demonstrated successfully using state-space based algorithms. These methods are advantageous because they rely on data-driven techniques that do not conform to models or assumptions like linearity. State-space-based features traditionally involve comparisons between measurements taken at the same location but at different times to determine if a change has taken place. However, if features such as state-space cross-prediction error and generalized interdependence are formulated such that they instead employ comparisons between simultaneous measurements at different locations, a fuller assessment of structural damage is possible. In addition to the presence of damage, other characteristics such as the extent, location, and type of damage can be revealed from these features. This approach is validated through a multi-degree-of-freedom oscillator and an experimental frame structure.
Doebling, S.W. , Farrar, C.R. and Prime, M.B. (1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock and Vibration Digest, 205, 631-645.
2.
Sampio, R.P. , Maia, N.M.M. and Silva, J.M.M. (1999). Damage detection using the frequency-response-function curvature method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 226, 1029-1042.
3.
Sohn, H. and Law, K.H. (1999). Extraction of Ritz vectors and application to structural damage diagnosis. In: Fifth US National Congress on Computational Mechanics, Boulder, Colorado.
4.
Norris, M.A. and Meirovitch, L. (1989). On the problem of modeling for parameter identification in distributed structures. In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 28, 2451-2463.
5.
Hou, Z., Noori, M. and Amand, R.S. (2000). Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection . Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, 677-683.
6.
Worden, K., Manson, G. and Fieller, N.J. (2000). Damage detection using outlier analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 229, 647-667.
7.
Nichols, J.M. , Seaver, M., Trickey, S.T., Todd, M.D., Olson, C.C. and Overbey, L.A. (2005). Detecting nonlinearity in structural systems using the transfer entropy. Physical Review E, 72, 1-11.
8.
Bishop, C.M. (1995). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Masri, S.F., Smyth, A.W., Chassiakos, A.G. and Hunter, N.F. (2000). Application of neural networks for detection of changes in nonlinear systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics , 126, 666-676.
10.
Tarassenko, L., Nairac, A., Townsend, N., Buxton, I. and Cowley, Z. (2000). Novelty detection for the identification of abnormalities. International Journal of Systems Science, 31, 1427-1439.
11.
Park, G., Kabeya, K., Cudney, H.H. and Inman, D.J. (1999). Impedance-based structural health monitoring for temperature varying applications. JSME International Journal , Series A, 42, 249-258.
12.
Chelidze, D. and Cusumano, J.P. (2004). A dynamical systems approach to failure prognosis. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics , 126, 1-7.
13.
Craig, C., Neilson, R.D. and Penman, J. (2000). The use of correlation dimension in condition monitoring of systems with clearance. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 231, 1-17.
14.
Trendafilova, I. and Van Brussel , H. (2001). Non-linear dynamics tools for the motion analysis and condition monitoring of robot joints. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing , 15, 1141-1164.
15.
Nichols, J.M. , Seaver, M., Trickey, S.T., Todd, M.D., Olson, C.C. and Overbey, L.A. (2005). Detecting nonlinearity in structural systems using the transfer entropy. Physical Review E, 72, 1-11.
16.
Overbey, L.A. , Olson, C.C. and Todd, M.D. (2007). A parametric investigation of state-space-based prediction error methods with stochastic excitation for structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures , 16, 1621-1638.
17.
Todd, M.D., Nichols, J.M., Pecora, L.M. and Virgin, L.N. (2001). Vibration-based damage assessment utilizing state space geometry changes: local attractor variance ratio. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, 1000-1008.
18.
Nichols, J.M. , Nichols, C.J., Todd, M.D., Seaver, M., Trickey, S.T. and Virgin, L.N. (2004). Use of data driven phase space models in assessing the strength of a bolted connection in a composite beam. Smart Materials and Structures, 13(2), 241-250.
19.
Todd, M.D., Nichols, J.M., Olson, C.C. and Overbey, L.A. (2005). Detecting generalized dynamic inter-relationship in a frame experiment with measures of information flow and interdependence . In: Proc. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials/NDE, Vol. 5768, San Diego, CA, March 2005 .
20.
Todd, M.D., Erickson, K., Chang, L., Lee, K. and Nichols, J.M. (2004). Using chaotic interrogation and attractor nonlinear cross-prediction error to detect fastener preload loss in an aluminum frame . Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 14, 387-399.
21.
Takens, F. (1981). Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand, D. and Young, L.S. (eds), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence: Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 898, pp. 366-381, New York, NY: Springer.
22.
Pecora, L.M., Moniz, L., Nichols, J.M. and Carroll, T.L. (2007). A unified approach to attractor reconstruction . Chaos, 17, 1-9.
23.
Fraser, A.M. and Swinney, H.L. (1986). Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Physical Review, 33, 1134-1140.
24.
Kennel, M.B. and Abarbanel, H.D.I. (1992). Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Physical Review A, 45, 3403-3411.
25.
Schreiber, T. (1997). Detecting and analysing nonstationarity in a time series with nonlinear cross predictions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 843-846.
26.
Overbey, L.A. and Todd, M.D. (2007). Analysis of local state space models for feature extraction in structural health monitoring. International Journal of Structural Health Monitoring, 6, 145-172.
27.
Theiler, J. (1986). Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Physical Review A, 34, 2427.
28.
Arnhold, J. , Grassberger, P., Lehnertz, K. and Elger, C.E. (1999). A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intercranially recorded EEG, Physica D, 134, 419-430.
29.
Sauer, T., Yorke, J.A. and Casdagli, M. (1991). Embedology. Journal of Statistical Physics, 65, 579-616.
30.
Overbey, L.A. and Todd, M.D. (2007). Damage identification through generalized correlations between measurements. In: Proc. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials/ NDE/Health Monitoring, Vol. 6532, 18-22 March.
