Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The output-only vibration-based structural health monitoring problem is addressed as the task of detecting damages modeled as changes in the eigenstructure of a linear dynamic system. The proposed damage detection algorithm is based on a residual generated from a subspace-based covariance-driven identification method and on the statistical local approach to the design of detection algorithms. This algorithm computes a global test, which performs a sensitivity analysis of the residuals to the damages, relative to uncertainties and noises. Numerical results are reported, which show the efficiency of the proposed method. They have been obtained on a geometrically simple test article designed, assembled and tested dynamically under impact and random shaker excitation. The method allows detecting damage in an early stage, and it does not require the extraction of the modal parameters from each newly collected data set. This characteristic is very well suited for monitoring purposes: it does not need continuous user interaction and it can easily be made automatic.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Doebling, S. W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D. W. (1996). Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Report LANL-13070-MS.

2. Natke, H.G. and Cempel, C. (1997). Model-aided diagnosis of mechanical systems: fundamentals, detection, localization, assessment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .

3. Basseville, M., Benveniste, A., Goursat, M., Hermans, L., Mevel, L. and Van der Auweraer, H. (2001). Output-only subspace-based structural identification: from theory to industrial practice . ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, Special Issue on Identification of Mechanical Systems, 123(4), 668-676 .

4. Basseville, M. (1998). On-board component fault detection and isolation using the statistical local approach . Automatica, 34(11), 1391-1416 .

5. Hermans, L. and Van der Auweraer, H. (1999). Modal testing and analysis of structures under operational conditions: industrial applications . Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(2), 193-216 .

6. Basseville, M., Abdelghani, M. and Benveniste, A. (2000). Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring . Automatica, 36(1), 101-109 .

7. Zhang, Q., Basseville, M. and Benveniste, A. (1994). Early warning of slight changes in systems and plants, application to condition based maintenance . Automatica, 30(1), 95-114 .

8. Vecchio, A., Van der Auweraer, H., Ferraro, G., Garesci, F. and Petrone, F. (2002). An experimental validation of a model-based approach in damage detection and localization . In: Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Cachan, F., July 10-12, 2002, pp. 245-252 .

9. Basseville, M., Benveniste, A., Moustakides, G. and Rougée, A. (1987). Optimal sensor location for detecting changes in dynamical behavior . IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, AC-32(12), 1067-1075 .

10.

10. Basseville, M. and Mevel, L. (2002). Output-only stochastic subspace-based structural identification and damage detection and localization . In: Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Cachan, F., July 10-12, 2002, pp. 229-236 .

11.

11. Mevel, L., Goursat, M. and Basseville, M. (2003a). Stochastic subspace-based structural identification and damage detection and localization - Application to the Z24 bridge benchmark . Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Special Issue on COST F3 benchmarks, 17(1), 143-151 .

12.

12. Vecchio, A. and Van der Auweraer, H. (2001). An experimental validation of a model-based approach in damage detection and localization . In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA., Sept. 12-14, 2001, pp. 957-966 .

13.

13. Goursat, M., Basseville, M., Benveniste, A. and Mevel, L. (2000). A Scilab toolbox for output only modal analysis and diagnosis . In: Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio, TX, Feb. 7-10.

14.

14. Mevel, L., Goursat, M. and Benveniste, A. (2003). Using subspace on flight data, a practical example . In: Proceedings of the 21th International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee, F1, Feb. 3-6.

15.

15. Mevel, L., Hermans, L. and Van der Auweraer, H. (1999). Application of a subspace-based fault detection method to industrial structures . Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6), 823-838 .

16.

16. Mevel, L., Goursat, M. and Basseville, M. (2003b). Stochastic subspace-based structural identification and damage detection - application to the steel-quake benchmark . Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Special Issue on COST F3 benchmarks, 17(1), 91-101 .

Output-Only Subspace-Based Damage Detection - Application to a Reticular Structure

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References