Several prior empirical studies have documented considerable mistakes, often ongoing, in how research is presented in introductory psychology textbooks. Extending upon these previous analyses, Bartels notes that introductory psychology textbooks also demonstrate a pronounced liberal/progressive bias. Given the pronounced ideological bias among both practitioners and researchers in the field, this should not be a surprise. In this comment, I extend Bartels’ observations by raising the issues with textbooks reflect widespread problems within our field. It is well past time that psychology takes a hard look at how to increase rigor and reduce political biases.
American Psychological Association (2015). Report of the Independent Reviewer and Related Materials. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/independent-review.
American Psychological Association (2021). Apology to People of Color for APA’s Role in Promoting, Perpetuating, and Failing to Challenge Racism, Racial Discrimination, and Human Hierarchy in the U.S. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/policy/racism-apology.
4.
BartelsJ. M. (2015). The Stanford prison experiment in introductory psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 14(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725714568007
5.
FergusonC. J. (2023). One Psychologist’s Reasons for Resigning From the American Psychological Association. In FrisbyC.ReddingR.O’DonohueW.LilienfeldS. (Eds.), Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology: Nature, Scope, and Solutions. Springer.
6.
FergusonC. J.BrownJ. M.TorresA. V. (2018). Education or indoctrination? The accuracy of introductory psychology textbooks in covering controversial topics and urban legends about psychology. Current Psychology, 37(3), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9539-7
7.
O’DonohueW.DyslinC. (1996). Abortion, boxing and Zionism: Politics and the APA. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi-org.stetson.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/0732-118X(95)00025-C
8.
O’DonohueW.WillisB. (2018). Problematic images of science in undergraduate psychology textbooks: How well is science understood and depicted?Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 51–62. https://doi.org.stetson.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/arc0000040.supp https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000040
9.
OswaldF. L.MitchellG.BlantonH.JaccardJ.TetlockP. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192. https://doi.org.stetson.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/a0032734.supp https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734
WarneR. T.AstleM. C.HillJ. C. (2018). What do undergraduates learn about human intelligence? An analysis of introductory psychology textbooks. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 32–50. https://doi.org.stetson.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/arc0000038.supp https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000038
