A high-fidelity simulation of two in-line counter-rotating propellers in hover, and in forward flight conditions are performed. Near field flow and acoustic properties were resolved using Hybrid LES-Unsteady RANS. Far-field sound predictions were performed using Ffowcs-Williams-Hawkings formulation. The two-propeller results in hovering are compared with that of the single propeller. This enabled us to identify the aerodynamic changes resulting from the proximity of the two propellers to each other and to understand the mechanisms causing the changes in the radiated sound. We then considered the forward flight case and compared it with the corresponding hovering case. This enabled us to identify the aerodynamic changes resulting from the incoming stream. By examining the near acoustic field, the far-field spectra, the Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, and by conducting periodic averaging, we were able to identify the sources of the changes to the observed tonal and broadband noise.
ZawodnyNSBoydDDBurleyCL. Acoustic characterization and prediction of representative, small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft system components2016. 72nd American Helicopter Society.
3.
MankbadiRRAfariSOGolubevVV. High-fidelity simulations of noise generation in a propeller-driven unmanned aerial vehicle. AIAA Journal2021; 59: 1020–1039. DOI: 10.2514/1.J059117
4.
ZhouTFattahR. Tonal noise acoustic interaction characteristics of multi-rotor vehicles. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2017. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-4054
FeightJAJacobJDGaetaRJ. Acoustic characterization of a multi-rotor UAS as a first step towards noise reduction. In: AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, 2017. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1174
7.
LeeHLeeDJ. Rotor interactional effects on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of a small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Physics of Fluids2020; 32: 047107. DOI: 10.1063/5.0003992
8.
ZawodnyNSPettingillNA. Acoustic wind tunnel measurements of a quadcopter in hover and forward flight conditions. NASA, 2018.
9.
IntaratepNAlexanderWNDevenportWJ, et al.Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Reston, VA, 2016. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-2873
10.
WangHZangBCelikA, et al.An experimental investigation of propeller noise in forward flow. In: Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 2019. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2620
11.
AlexanderNWhelchelJ. Flyover Noise of Multi-Rotor sUAS. In: Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 2019. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, pp. 2548–2558.
12.
StephensDBEnviaE. Acoustic shielding for a model scale counter-rotation open rotor. In: Proceedings of the 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2011 (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Portland, Oregon, 2011. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-2940.
13.
TruongAPapamoschouD. Aeroacoustic testing of open rotors at very small scale. In: Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and Aerospace exposition, Texas, 2013. DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-217
CadieuxFBaradMJensenJ, et al.Predicting quad copter drone noise. NASA, 2019.
16.
AlvarezEJNingA. Modeling multirotor aerodynamic interactions through the vortex particle method. In: AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 2019. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2827
17.
NguygenCKellyJ. A users guide for the NASA ANOPP propeller analysis system. NASA, 1997. NASA CR-4768.
18.
RizziSAZawodnyNSPettingillNA. On the use of Acoustic Wind Tunnel Data for the Simulation of sUAS Flyover Noise. In: Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Reston, Virginia, 2019. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2630
19.
MankbadiRRAfariSGolubevV v. Towards high-fidelity analysis of noise radiation and control of propeller-driven UAV. In: Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Reston, VA, 2019. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2632
20.
MankbadiRRAfariSGolubevV v. Simulations of Broadband Noise of a Small UAV Propeller. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Reston, VA, 2020. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1493
21.
Ffowcs WilliamsJEHawkingsDL. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences1969; 264: 0031. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1969.0031
SPALARTPALLMARASS. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: Proceedings of the 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA, 1992. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. DOI: 10.2514/6.1992-439
ShurMLStreletsMKTravinAK, et al.Turbulence modeling in rotating and curved channels: assessing the spalart-shur correction. AIAA Journal2000; 38: 784–792.
BrentnerKS. Modeling aerodynamically generated sound: Recent advances in rotor noise prediction. In: Proceedings of the 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2000. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-345
32.
ZhouWNingZLiH, et al.An experimental investigation on rotor-to-rotor interactions of small UAV. In: Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado, 2017, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3744
33.
YoonSLeeHCPulliamTH. Computational analysis of multi-rotor flows. In: Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, 2016. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0812
34.
MajumdarSJPeakeN. Noise generation by the interaction between ingested turbulence and a rotating fan. J Fluid Mech1998; 359: 181–216.
35.
RobisonRAVPeakeN. Noise generation by turbulence–propeller interaction in asymmetric flow. J Fluid Mech2014; 758: 121–149.
36.
PascioniKARizziSASchillerNH. Noise reduction potential of phase control for distributed propulsion vehicles. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, San Diego, CA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-1069
37.
TowneASchmidtOTColoniusT. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. J Fluid Mech2018; 847: 821–867.
38.
LopesL vBoydDDNarkDM, et al.Identification of spurious signals from permeable Ffowcs williams and Hawkings surfaces. In: Presented at 73rd American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 2017.
39.
EpikhinAEvdokimovIKraposhinM, et al.Development of a dynamic library for computational aeroacoustics applications using the OpenFOAM open source package. Procedia Comput Sci2015; 66: 150–157.
40.
SreeD. A novel signal processing technique for separating tonal and broadband noise components from counter-rotating open-rotor acoustic dataInt. J. Aeroacoustics2013; 12: 169–188. DOI: 10.1260/1475-472X.12.1-2.169.
41.
ManiR. The radiation of sound from a propeller at angle of attack. Royal Society, 1990.
42.
GhorbaniaslGSiozos-RousoulisLLacorC. A time-domain Kirchhoff formula for the convective acoustic wave equation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences2016; 472: 20150689.
MccluerMS. Helicopter blade-vortex interaction noise with comparisons to CFD calculations. NASA, 1996.
45.
BrooksTFStuartDMarcoliniMA. NASA reference publication 1218 airfoil self-noise and prediction. NASA, 1989.
46.
NguyenLGolubevVMankbadiR, et al.Numerical investigation of tonal trailing-edge noise radiated by low reynolds number airfoils. Applied Sciences2021; 11: 2257.
